Correction to: Proc Zool Soc https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-019-00309-2

In the original publication, Fig. 1, corresponding legend and a sentence under the section ‘Results’ were incorrectly published.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Bee visitation rate across the agricultural intensification gradient. The differences in bee visitation rate were only significant in between low and high intensification zones and low and mid-intensification zones. There was no significant difference between mid- and high intensification zones. (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05)

The correct sentence should read as: There was no significant difference between mid- and high intensification zones (Dunn’s test, p > 0.05).

The corrected Fig. 1 and the legend are given below.