Skip to main content

The Problem of Reductionism in Science

(Colloquium of the Swiss Society of Logic and Philosophy of Science, Zürich, May 18–19, 1990)

  • Book
  • © 1991

Overview

Part of the book series: Episteme (EPIS, volume 18)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (12 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

The topic to which this book is devoted is reductionism, and not reduction. The difference in the adoption of these two denominations is not, contrary to what might appear at first sight, just a matter of preference between a more abstract (reductionism) or a more concrete (reduction) terminology for indicating the same sUbject matter. In fact, the difference is that between a philosophical doctrine (or, perhaps, simply a philosophical tenet or claim) and a scientific procedure. Of course, this does not mean that these two fields are separated; they are only distinct, and this already means that they are also likely to be interrelated. However it is useful to consider them separately, if at least to better understand how and why they are interconnected. Just to give a first example of difference, we can remark that a philosophical doctrine is something which makes a claim and, as such, invites controversy and should, in a way, be challenged. A scientific procedure, on the other hand, is something which concretely exists, and as such must be first of all described, interpreted, understood, defined precisely and analyzed critically; this work may well lead to uncovering limitations of this procedure, or of certain ways of conceiving or defining it, but it does not lead to really challenging it.

Editors and Affiliations

  • University of Fribourg, Switzerland

    Evandro Agazzi

  • University of Genova, Italy

    Evandro Agazzi

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: The Problem of Reductionism in Science

  • Book Subtitle: (Colloquium of the Swiss Society of Logic and Philosophy of Science, Zürich, May 18–19, 1990)

  • Editors: Evandro Agazzi

  • Series Title: Episteme

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3492-7

  • Publisher: Springer Dordrecht

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

  • Copyright Information: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-7923-1406-6Published: 31 August 1991

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-94-010-5544-4Published: 03 October 2013

  • eBook ISBN: 978-94-011-3492-7Published: 06 December 2012

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XVIII, 217

  • Topics: Philosophy of Science, Logic, Philosophy of Nature, Epistemology

Publish with us