Skip to main content

Reductionism and Reduction in Logic and in Mathematics

  • Chapter
The Problem of Reductionism in Science

Part of the book series: Episteme ((EPIS,volume 18))

  • 140 Accesses

Abstract

The paper is divided into three parts. First I shall talk about reduc-tionism and reduction in general. In the second chapter a historical example of reductionism will be analyzed: the principles of rationalism of the 17th century. In the third chapter different kinds of reductionisms and reductions in modern logic and mathematics will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernays, P. (MEW) “Mathematische Existenz und Widerspruchsfreiheit”, in: Bernays, P.: Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik. Darmstadt 1976, pp. 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigler J./-Reichel H.-C.: Topologie. Eine Grundvorlesung. BI Hochschultaschenbücher, Bd. 121. Mannheim-Wien-Zürich 21987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleave (AEB): “An Accont of Entailment Based on Classical Semantics”, Analysis 34, pp. 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes (RD): Rules for the Direction of the Mind Indianapolis 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (GGA): Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Bd. I Jena 1893 (Darmstadt 1962), Bd. II Jena 1903 (Darmstadt 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (RML): “Russell’s Mathematical Logic”, in: Russell, B.: The Philosophy of Bertrand Russel, ed. A. Schilpp, New York 1944, pp. 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, H. (ILG): “Ideen von Leibniz zur Grundlagenforschung: Die ars inveniendi und die ars iudicandi”, in: Studia Leibniziana Supplementa, Vol. 15–4, K. Müller, H. Schepers, and W. Totok (eds.), Wiesbaden 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillbert (GEZ): “Die Grundlegung der elementaren Zahlenlehre”, in: Mathem. Annalen 104 (1931), pp. 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillbert (GSA): Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Berlin 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (KRV): Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Riga 1781 (1787).

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, S. (CTh): Conceptual Thinking New York 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisel, G. (ACM): “On Analogies in Contemporary Mathematics”, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisel, G. (HPG): “Hilbert’s Programme”, in: Benecerraf, P. and Putnam, H. (eds.): Philosophy of Mathematics. Englewood Cliffs 1964, pp. 157–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz (GP): Grundgesetze der Philosophie. Frankfurt 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz (NE): Nouveau Essais sur l’entendement humain. Frankfurt 1961. Leibniz (OF): Opuscules et fragmetns inédits de Leibniz. Paris 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, J. (ASy): Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. London 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. Jr. (LLA): “Lukasiewicz, Leibniz and the Arithmetization of the Syllogism”, in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18(1977), pp. 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (OUN): The Open Universe. Totowa 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (LIP): Leibniz. An Introduction to His Philosophy. Oxford 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (IMP): Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London 1919 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (PM):The Principles of Mathematics. London 1937 (1903).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. (DRS): “Das deduktive Relevanzkriterium von Stephan Körner und seine wissenschaftstheoretischen Anwendungen”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 20 (1983), pp. 149–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. (RDS): “Relevant Deduction. From Solving Paradoxes Towards a General Theory”, Erkenntnis 35,1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G., Weingartner, P. (VDR): “Verisimilitude Defined by Relevant Consequence Elements. A New Reconstruction of Popper’s Original Idea”, in: Kuipers, Th. (ed.): What is Closer-to-the-Truth Amsterdam 1987, pp. 47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolem, T. (NCZ): “Über die Nicht-Charakterisierbarkeit der Zahlenreihe mittels endlich oder abzahlbar unendlich vieler Aussagen mit ausschließlich Zahlenvariablen”, in: Fund. Math. 23 (1934), pp. 150–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolem, T. (UVC): “Über die Unmöglichkeit einer Charakterisierung der Zahlenreihe mittels eines endlichen Axiomensystems”, in: Skolem, T.: Selected Works in Logic (ed. J.E. Fenstad), Oslo 1970, pp. 345–354. (Originally published in 1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (FMP): “The Formalization of Mathematics”, Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (1954), pp. 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. (APS): “Antinomies and Paradoxes and their Solutions”, in: Studies in Soviet Thought 39 (1990), pp. 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. (CEM): “On the Characterization of Entities by Means of Individuals and Properties”, Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (1974), pp. 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. (DLM): “On the Demarcation between Logic and Mathematics”, The Monist 65 (1982), pp. 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. (IMS): “The Ideal of Mathematization of All Sciences and of ’More Geometrico’ in Descartes and Leibniz”, in: Shea, W. R. (ed.): Nature Mathematized Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of History and Philosophy of Science (Montreal 1980). Dordrecht 1983, pp. 151–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. (PDS): “A Proposal to Define a Special Type of Proposition”, in: Weingartner,, P./Schurz, G. (eds.): Philosophy of the Natural Sciences. Proceedings of the 13th International Wittgenstein-Symposium, Kirchberg/Wechsel, Austria 1988. Wien 1989, pp. 348–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. (RCT): “Remarks on the Consequence-Class of Theories”, in: Scheibe, E. (ed.): The Role of Experience in Science. Proceedings of the 1986 Conference of the Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Science (Bruxelles) Held at the University of Heidelberg. Berlin 1988, pp. 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P., Schurz, G. (PSS): “Paradoxes Solved by Two Simple Relevance Criteria”, in: Logique et Analyse 3 (1986), pp. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weingartner, P. (1991). Reductionism and Reduction in Logic and in Mathematics. In: Agazzi, E. (eds) The Problem of Reductionism in Science. Episteme, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3492-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3492-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5544-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3492-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics