# Generalized Lazarevic's Inequality and Its Applications—Part II

• Ling Zhu
Open Access
Research Article

## Abstract

A generalized Lazarevic's inequality is established. The applications of this generalized Lazarevic's inequality give some new lower bounds for logarithmic mean.

## Keywords

Lower Bound Concise Proof
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## 1. Introduction

Lazarević [1] (or see Mitrinović [2]) gives us the following result.

Theorem 1.1.

Let . Then

holds if and only if .

Recently, the author of this paper gives a new proof of the inequality (1.1) in [3] and extends the inequality (1.1) to the following result in [4].

Theorem 1.2.

Let , and . Then

holds if and only if .

Moreover, the inequality (1.1) can be extended as follows.

Theorem 1.3.

holds if and only if .

## 2. Three Lemmas

Lemma 2.1 (see [5, 6, 7, 8]).

Let be two continuous functions which are differentiable on . Further, let on . If is increasing (or decreasing) on , then the functions and are also increasing (or decreasing) on .

Lemma 2.2 (see [9, 10, 11]).

Let and be real numbers, and let the power series and be convergent for . If for and if is strictly increasing (or decreasing) for then the function is strictly increasing (or decreasing) on .

Lemma 2.3.

Let and . Then the function strictly increases as increases.

## 3. A Concise Proof of Theorem 1.3

Let , where , and . Then

We compute

where

We obtain results in two cases.
1. (a)

Let , then and . Let for we have that and is decreasing for so is decreasing for and is decreasing on by Lemma 2.2. Hence is decreasing on and is decreasing on by Lemma 2.1. Thus is decreasing on by Lemma 2.1.

2. (b)

Let , then . Let for we have that and is decreasing for so is decreasing for and is decreasing on by Lemma 2.2. Hence is increasing on and is decreasing on by Lemma 2.1. Thus is decreasing on by Lemma 2.1.

Since

the proof of Theorem 1.3 is complete.

## 4. Some New Lower Bounds for Logarithmic Mean

Assuming that and are two different positive numbers, let , , and be the arithmetic, geometric, and logarithmic means, respectively. It is well known that (see [2, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16])

Ostle and Terwilliger [17] (or see Leach and Sholander [18], Zhu [16]) gave bounds for in terms of and as follows:

Without loss of generality, let and , then . Replacing with in (1.3), we obtain the following new results for three classical means.

Theorem 4.1.

Let or , and and be two positive numbers such that . Then

holds if and only if .

Now letting in inequality (4.3) be , and , respectively, by Theorem 4.1 and Lemma 2.3 we have the following inequalities:

## References

1. 1.
Lazarević I: Neke nejednakosti sa hiperbolickim funkcijama. Univerzitet u Beogradu. Publikacije Elektrotehničkog Fakulteta. Serija Matematika i Fizika 1966, 170: 41–48.Google Scholar
2. 2.
Mitrinović DS: Analytic Inequalities. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1970:xii+400.
3. 3.
Zhu L: On Wilker-type inequalities. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications 2007,10(4):727–731.
4. 4.
Zhu L: Generalized Lazarevic's inequality and its applications—part I. submitted submittedGoogle Scholar
5. 5.
Vamanamurthy MK, Vuorinen M: Inequalities for means. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1994,183(1):155–166. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1137
6. 6.
Anderson GD, Qiu S-L, Vamanamurthy MK, Vuorinen M: Generalized elliptic integrals and modular equations. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 2000,192(1):1–37. 10.2140/pjm.2000.192.1
7. 7.
Pinelis I: L'Hospital type results for monotonicity, with applications. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2002,3(1, article 5):1–5.
8. 8.
Pinelis I: On L'Hospital-type rules for monotonicity. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2006,7(2, article 40):1–19.
9. 9.
Biernacki M, Krzyż J: On the monotonity of certain functionals in the theory of analytic functions. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 1955, 9: 135–147.
10. 10.
Ponnusamy S, Vuorinen M: Asymptotic expansions and inequalities for hypergeometric functions. Mathematika 1997,44(2):278–301. 10.1112/S0025579300012602
11. 11.
Alzer H, Qiu S-L: Monotonicity theorems and inequalities for the complete elliptic integrals. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2004,172(2):289–312. 10.1016/j.cam.2004.02.009
12. 12.
Kuang JC: Applied Inequalities. 3rd edition. Shangdong Science and Technology Press, Jinan City, China; 2004.Google Scholar
13. 13.
Sándor J: On the identric and logarithmic means. Aequationes Mathematicae 1990,40(2–3):261–270.
14. 14.
Alzer H: Ungleichungen für Mittelwerte. Archiv der Mathematik 1986,47(5):422–426. 10.1007/BF01189983
15. 15.
Stolarsky KB: The power and generalized logarithmic means. The American Mathematical Monthly 1980,87(7):545–548. 10.2307/2321420
16. 16.
Zhu L: From chains for mean value inequalities to Mitrinovic's problem II. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 2005,36(1):118–125. 10.1080/00207390412331314971
17. 17.
Ostle B, Terwilliger HL: A comparison of two means. Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences 1957, 17: 69–70.Google Scholar
18. 18.
Leach EB, Sholander MC: Extended mean values. II. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1983,92(1):207–223. 10.1016/0022-247X(83)90280-9