Abstract
Under the lens of construal level theory (CLT), this paper offers a new perspective on lifestyle advertising practiced by luxury brands clarifying both its value and its limitations. We find that under conditions of high brand familiarity (BF) lifestyle advertising is inconsistent with high-level construals, diminishing consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the advertised brand. Using a measure of language-induced abstractness, we show that lifestyle advertising is detrimental to WTP when consumers are familiar with the brand (condition involving saliency of low-level construals), but not when they are new to the brand (n = 180). In a follow-up study, we find support for a moderated mediation model in which abstractness mediates the effect of advertising type on WTP, whereas BF moderates the mediation, depressing abstractness when familiarity is high and enhancing it when low. In conclusion, our evidence suggests to managers in the luxury industry that low construal levels are key to using price as a tactical tool in positioning their brands. We conclude with a discussion of implications of these results for luxury brands research and management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker, D.A., and E. Joachimsthaler. 2000. Brand leadership: The next level of the brand revolution. New York: Free Press.
Bar-Anan, Y., N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2006. The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(4): 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609.
Belk, R.W. 1989. Extended self and extending paradigmatic perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 16(1): 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1086/209202.
Berger, J., and C. Heath. 2007. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research 34(2): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/519142.
Carnaghi, A., A. Maass, S. Gresta, M. Bianchi, M. Cadinu, and L. Arcuri. 2008. Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94(5): 839–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.839.
Chernev, A., R. Hamilton, and D. Gal. 2011. Competing for consumer identity: Limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. Journal of Marketing 75(3): 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.3.66.
Cian, L., A. Krishna, and N. Schwarz. 2015. Positioning rationality and emotion: Rationality is up and emotion is down. Journal of Consumer Research 42(4): 632–651. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv046.
Cohen, R.J. 2014. Brand personification: Introduction and overview. Psychology & Marketing 31(1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20671.
Cooper, H., S. Schembri, and D. Miller. 2010. Brand-self identity narratives in the James Bond movies. Psychology & Marketing 27(6): 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20344.
Dawar, N., and J. Lei. 2009. Brand crises: The roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. Journal of Business Research 62(4): 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.02.001.
Dichter, E. 1986. Whose lifestyle is it anyway? Psychology & Marketing 3(3): 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220030304.
Escalas, J.E., and J.R. Bettman. 2005. Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research 32(3): 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/497549.
Fournier, S. 1998. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 24(4): 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1086/209515.
Freire, N.A. 2014. When luxury advertising adds the identitary values of luxury: A semiotic analysis. Journal of Business Research 67(12): 2666–2675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.004.
Fujita, K., M.D. Henderson, J. Eng, Y. Trope, and N. Liberman. 2006. Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science 17(4): 278–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01698.x.
Greenwald, A.G., D.E. McGhee, and J.L. Schwartz. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
Gutman, J. 1982. A mean-end chain model on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing 46(2): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/3203341.
Hansen, J., and M. Wänke. 2011. The abstractness of luxury. Journal of Economic Psychology 32(5): 789–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.005.
Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Hennigs, N., K.P. Wiedmann, S. Behrens, and C. Klarmann. 2013. Unleashing the power of luxury: Antecedents of luxury brand perception and effects on luxury brand strength. Journal of Brand Management 20(8): 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2013.11.
Hustvedt, G., and J.C. Bernard. 2010. Effects of social responsibility labelling and brand on willingness to pay for apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies 34(6): 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00870.x.
Kapferer, J.-N. 2012. The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
Kapferer, J.-N.M., and P. Valette-Florence. 2018a. The impact of increased brand penetration on luxury desirability: A dual effect. Journal of Brand Management. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0091-7.
Kapferer, J.-N., and P. Valette-Florence. 2018b. The impact of brand penetration and awareness on luxury brand desirability: A cross country analysis of the relevance of the rarity principle. Journal of Business Research 83(1): 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.025.
Kardes, F.R., M.L. Cronley, and J. Kim. 2006. Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16(2): 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1602_4.
Keel, A., and R. Nataraajan. 2012. Celebrity endorsements and beyond: New avenues for celebrity branding. Psychology & Marketing 29(9): 690–703. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20555.
Kim, H., and D.R. John. 2008. Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology 18(2): 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2008.01.006.
Kim, J.E., S. Lloyd, and M.C. Cervellon. 2016. Narrative-transportation storylines in luxury brand advertising: Motivating consumer engagement. Journal of Business Research 69(1): 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.002.
Kim, K., M. Zhang, and X. Li. 2008. Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 35(4): 706–713. https://doi.org/10.1086/592131.
König, J.C., K.P. Wiedmann, N. Hennigs, and J. Haase. 2016. The legends of tomorrow: A semiotic approach towards a brand myth of luxury heritage. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 26(2): 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2016.1143155.
Koschate-Fischer, N., A. Diamantopoulos, and K. Oldenkotte. 2012. Are consumers really willing to pay more for a favorable country image? A study of country-of-origin effects on willingness to pay. Journal of International Marketing 20(1): 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.10.0140.
Li, G., G. Li, and Z. Kambele. 2012. Luxury fashion brand consumers in China: Perceived value, fashion lifestyle, and willingness to pay. Journal of Business Research 65(10): 1516–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.019.
Liberman, N., and Y. Trope. 1998. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5.
Massara, F., and F. Severino. 2013. Psychological distance in the heritage experience. Annals of Tourism Research 42: 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.01.005.
Mitra, A., and J. Lynch. 1995. Toward a reconciliation of market power and information theories of advertising effects on price elasticity. Journal of Consumer Research 21(4): 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1086/209425.
Netemeyer, R.G., B. Krishnan, C. Pullig, G. Wang, M. Yagci, D. Dean, J. Ricks, and F. Wirth. 2004. Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity. Journal of Business Research 57(2): 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00303-4.
O’Connor, C. 2013. Apple’s hire of Burberry’s Angela Ahrendts shows its future is in lifestyle, not tech. Forbes, October 15. http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2013/10/15/apples-hire-of-burberrys-angela-ahrendts-shows-its-future-is-in-lifestyle-not-tech/. Last access 21 June 2017.
Quinn, K.A., M.F. Mason, and C.N. Macrae. 2009. Familiarity and person construal: Individuating knowledge moderates the automaticity of category activation. European Journal of Social Psychology 39(5): 852–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.596.
Rao, A.R., and K.B. Monroe. 1988. The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 15(2): 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/209162.
Semin, G.R., and K. Fiedler. 1988. The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing person: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(4): 558–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558.
Simonson, I., and A. Drolet. 2004. Anchoring effects on consumers’ willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept. Journal of Consumer Research 31(3): 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1086/425103.
Spencer, S.J., M.P. Zanna, and G.T. Fong. 2005. Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(6): 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845.
Trope, Y., N. Liberman, and C. Wakslak. 2007. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17(2): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X.
van Doorn, J., and P.C. Verhoef. 2011. Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing 28(3): 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.02.005.
Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance 16(1): 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x.
Weil, J. 2015. Johnny Depp to front Dior scent. WWD, June 3. http://wwd.com/beauty-industry-news/fragrance/johnny-depp-dior-fragrance-10139875/. Last access 21 June 2017.
Wertenbroch, K., and B. Skiera. 2002. Measuring consumers’ willingness to pay at the point of purchase. Journal of Marketing Research 39(2): 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.2.228.19086.
Wu, M.-S.S., C.-H.S. Chen, and B. Nguyen. 2015. Luxury brand purchases and the extended self. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration 73(3): 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2015-0046.
Zeithaml, V. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52(3): 2–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Study 1
See Table 4.
Lifestyle advertising prime: luxury brand travel bag
Abstractness index
Adjective-to-nouns ratio about 1/3 (9 adjectives, 16 verbs, 29 nouns in the manipulated text)
The product that you see depicted is a “Luxury Brand” travel bag. This productis generally appealing to all (both male and female) and has been designed to strictly adhere to the precisestyle of the person who uses it which is inspired by traveling and which enhances the absolutemeaning and importance of the trip. In accordance with the Luxury Brand style, unmistakable and recognized throughout the world, life itself is a journey, a wonderfulprocess of self-discovery. Today, Luxury Brandis considered to be among the most exclusiveluxury brands in the world; all the productsfollow the uniquestyle of the house, a distinctivestyle that can give the productsexceptionalvalue.
Attribute-based branding prime: luxury brand travel bag
Abstractness index
Adjective-to-nouns ratio about 1/10 (3 adjectives, 13 verbs, 36 nouns in the manipulated text).
The product that you see depicted is a “Luxury Brand” travel bag. This productis generally appealing to all (both male and female) and has been designed to strictly adhere to the style of the housebased on the idea of Luxury Brand Founder, who began his career as a baggage packer for Napoleon III’s wife Eugenie de Montijo, the Empress of France. His jobwas to give a meaning to travels and trips. Today, all Luxury Brand products, from clothing to accessories (handbags, suitcases) arehandmade by artisans of the fashion house who use the finestmaterials to createproducts of exceptionalvalue.
Study 2
See Table 5.
Equalized lifestyle advertising prime: luxury brand travel bag
Abstractness index
Adjective-to-nouns ratio about 1/6 (4 adjectives, 16 verbs, 26 nouns in the manipulated text)
The product that you see depicted is a “Luxury Brand” travel bag. This productis generally appealing to all (both male and female) and has been designed to strictly adhere to the style of the person who uses it, which is inspired by traveling and which enhances the meaning of the trip. In accordance with the Luxury Brand style, unmistakable and recognized throughout the world, life itself is a journey. Today, Luxury Brandis considered to be among the most exclusiveluxury brands in the world; all the productsfollow the style of the house, a distinctivestyle that can give the productsexceptionalvalue.
Equalized attribute-based advertising prime: luxury brand travel bag
Abstractness index
Adjective-to-nouns ratio about 1/6 (4 adjectives, 12 verbs, 28 nouns in the manipulated text).
The product that you see depicted is a “Luxury Brand” travel bag. This productis generally appealing to all (both male and female) and has been designed to strictly adhere to the style of the housebased on the idea of ParisianLuxury Brand Founder, who began his career as a baggage packer at the court of France. His jobwas to give a specialmeaning to travels. Today, all Luxury Brand products, from clothing to accessoriesare handmade by artisans of the fashion house who use the finestmaterials to createproducts of exceptionalvalue.
Note Picture shown in Study 2 same as in Study 1.
Appendix 2
Implicit association test (IAT)
The categories proposed were the two pairs Lifestyle/Attribute and Abstract/Concrete. For each category, five elements had to be classified correctly into the category.
Categories | Elements |
---|---|
Abstract | General, imaginary, intangible, figurative, universal |
Concrete | Specific, detailed, definite, real, local |
Lifestyle | Charm, dream, self-expression, freedom, style |
Attribute | Materials, finishes, craftsmanship, tradition, warranty |
Figure 5 depicts the English translation of a sequence of seven trials.
Appendix 3
Items used to test the manipulation of lifestyle versus attribute branding.
Items associated with lifestyle branding:
-
Our brand is trendy.
-
With our brand, you will feel at ease with the groups you mix with.
-
We help you feel immediately recognized and appreciated.
-
Our lifestyle is a reflection of you.
-
Without our brand, you wouldn’t be able to show the world who you really are.
Features associated with attribute branding:
-
Our high-quality products are handmade and not mass-produced.
-
Our products are synonymous with high quality because artisans make them.
-
Our products are valuable because artisans make them.
-
The intrinsic quality of our products makes them long-lasting.
-
Both tradition and our past experience are our guarantee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Massara, F., Porcheddu, D. & Melara, R.D. Luxury brands pursuing lifestyle positioning: effects on willingness to pay. J Brand Manag 26, 291–303 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0130-4
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0130-4