Skip to main content
Log in

The phonological awareness relation to early reading in English for three groups of simultaneous bilingual children

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phonological awareness is critical for early reading acquisition across alphabetic as well as non-alphabetic languages. The grain size of phonological awareness varies with oral language structure and written orthography across languages. Phonological awareness’ grain size and contribution to reading for simultaneous biliterate children is currently unknown. In this study, we examine syllable, rime and phoneme level awareness for bilingual children with differences in structure of their known languages in order to investigate any potential cross-language effects of their ethnic language on English reading. For 612 Chinese and English, Malay and English, and Tamil and English speakers in kindergarten, different patterns emerged across the language groups with regard to the grain size of phonological awareness over a 2-year period. The patterns of phonological awareness levels in predicting early English reading skills also differed amongst these bilingual language groups. The role of vocabulary in the relation between phonological awareness and reading was not consistent, showing small moderating and mediating effects only in some instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CE, ME and TE notations are used rather than the hyphenated conventions because L1 and L2 languages are not categorically delineated in the context of the multilingual society of Singapore.

  2. Aksara encodes CV, CCV, CCVV, CVV, CCVV, and CCCVV as well as V and VV, where VV stands for a long vowel or a diphthong (Padakannaya & Mohanty, 2004, p. 9).

  3. The term ‘mother tongue’ is used in various curriculum and policy documents (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2011, 2013), and children are assigned to participate in classes in one of the three official languages, usually based on their ethnicity (hence, our use of the term ‘ethnic language’). This does not always reflect their dominant or home language (Cavallaro & Serwe, 2010).

  4. For example, /dru/ in ‘ondru’ combines the vowel for /u/ and the vowel for /r/, and could be considered a VV syllable glyph, but the other aksharas in this word represent single ‘phonemes’ for the vowel ‘n’ and the vowel ‘o’.

References

  • Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuvaneshwari, B., & Padakannaya, P. (2014). Reading in Tamil: A more alphabetic and less syllabic akshara-based orthography. In H. Winksel & P. Padakannaya (Eds.), South and southeast asian psycholinguisitics (pp. 192–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildiren, A. (2017). Reliability and validity study for the coloured progressive matrices test between the ages of 3–9 for determining gifted children in the pre-school period. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsong, D. (2015). Dominance in bilingualism: Foundations of measurement, with insights from the study of handedness. In C. Silva-Corvalán & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 66–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branum-Martin, L., Tao, S., & Garnaat, S. (2015). Bilingual phonological awareness: Reexamining the evidence for relations within and across languages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branum-Martin, L., Tao, S., Garnaat, S., Bunta, F., & Francis, D. J. (2012). Meta-analysis of bilingual phonological awareness: Language, age, and psycholinguistic grain size. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 932–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. R., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: Evidence from a preschool sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70(2), 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M. (2006). Refining the psycholinguistic grain size theory: Effects of phonotactics and word formation on the availability of phonemes to preliterate children. Developmental Science, 9(5), 445–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M., & Bruck, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children′s phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro, F., & Serwe, S. K. (2010). Language use and language shift among the Malays in Singapore. In W. Li (Ed.), Applied linguistics review (pp. 129–170). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, H., & Chen, H. (2004). Early orthographic experience modifies both phonological awareness and on-line speech processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, H., Chen, H.-C., Lai, C. Y., Wong, O. C., & Hills, M. (2001). The development of phonological awareness: Effects of spoken language experience and orthography. Cognition, 81(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Katz, L. E., & Tola, G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. T., & Share, D. L. (2018). Writing system variation and its consequences for reading and dyslexia. Scientific Studies Of Reading, 22(1), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015). Illiterate to literate: Behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E., & Poe, M. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, L. (2010). The importance of phonological awareness for the development of early English reading skills among bilingual Singaporean kindergartners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(6), 723–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, L. (2011). Singaporean kindergartners’ phonological awareness and English writing skills. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. G., Castro, S. L., Defior, S., Seymour, P. H. K., et al. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127(3), 398–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu, A. Y., & Oney, B. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: Towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia, 6(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2005). Synthetic phonics and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21(4), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottardo, A., Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., & Ramirez, G. (2015). The impact of language on the relationships between phonological awareness and word reading in different orthographies: A test of the psycholinguistic grain size theory in bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1083–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, J., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(2), 338–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., Wang, Q., & Anderson, R. C. (2005). Chinese children’s use of subcharacter information about pronunciation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 572–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. S. H., & Bryant, P. (1997). Development of phonological awareness of Chinese children in Hong Kong. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, C. F., & Catts, H. W. (1998). The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(1), 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. M. (2014). Literacy in Kannada, an alphasyllabic orthography. In H. Winksel & P. Padakannaya (Eds.), South and southeast asian psycholinguistics (pp. 184–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, J., Shum, K., Ho, C., & Au, T. (2015). Phonological representations and early literacy in Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(2), 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2007). Phonological awareness and literacy skills in Korean: An examination of the unique role of body-coda units. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(1), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolinsky, R., Monteiro-Plantin, R. S., Mengarda, E. J., Grimm-Cabral, L., Scliar-Cabral, L., & Morais, J. (2014). How formal education and literacy impact on the content and structure of semantic categories. Trends In Neuroscience And Education, 3(3–4), 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lallier, M., & Carreiras, M. (2018). Cross-linguistic transfer in bilinguals reading in two alphabetic orthographies: The grain size accommodation hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 386–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. W., & Low, H. M. (2011). Developing an online Malay language word corpus for primary schools. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 7(3), 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. W., & Wheldall, K. (2011). Acquisition of Malay word recognition skills: Lessons from low-progress early readers. Dyslexia, 17(1), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K., Cheng, P. W., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The role of sensitivity to rhymes, phonemes and tones in reading English and Chinese pseudowords. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Rao, N., & Tse, S. (2012). Adapting Western pedagogies for Chinese literacy instruction: Case studies of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Singapore preschools. Early Education & Development, 23(4), 603–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Yeung, S. S. (under review). Vocabulary mediates the effects of phonological awareness, letter knowledge and syntactic awareness on word reading.

  • Lonigan, C. J. (2007). Vocabulary development and the development of phonological awareness skills in preschool children. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 15–31). London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C., Burgess, S., & Anthony, J. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36(5), 596–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, S. C. (1989). Frequency dictionary of Chinese characters, words and phrases used in Singapore primary school textbooks. Singapore: Center of Research for Chinese, National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., & Høien, T. (1990). Patterns of information processing skills and word recognition strategies in developmental dyslexia. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 34(3), 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K. Y., & Li, Y. (2004). Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C. S. H. (2000). Developmental issues in Chinese children’s character acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, D., McGuinness, C., & Donohue, J. (1995). Phonological training and the alphabet principle: Evidence for reciprocal causality. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2011). Cross-linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2011). Review of mother tongue languages report. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2013). Nurturing early learners: A curriculum for kindergartens in Singapore—A framework for mother tongue languages. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Cary, L., & Alegria, J. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24(1–2), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nag, S. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag, S., Caravolas, M., & Snowling, M. (2011). Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(6), 615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, P. R., Koda, K., & Joshi, R. M. (2014). Biliteracy acquisition in Kannada and English: A developmental study. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E. H., Tardif, T., Huang, J., & Shu, H. (2011). Phonemes matter: The role of phoneme-level awareness in emergent Chinese readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G. P., & Haley, A. (2013). One complicated extended family: The influence of alphabetic knowledge and vocabulary on phonemic awarenesss. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padakannaya, P., & Mohanty, A. K. (2004). Indian orthography and teaching how to read: A psycholinguistic framework. Psychological Studies, 49, 262–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., Fiez, J., Bolger, D. J., & Tan, L. H. (2007). Reading in two writing systems: Accommodation and assimilation of the brain’s reading network. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1999). The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In J. Wang, A. Inhoff, & H.-S. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115–134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pua, E. P. K., Lee, M. L. C., & Richard-Liow, S. J. (2017). Screening bilingual preschoolers for language difficulties: Utility of teacher and parent reports. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 950–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2008). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 3: The standard progressive matrices. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, P., & Koda, K. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard-Liow, S. J. (2014). Diversity in bilingual children’s spelling skill development: The case of Singapore. In H. Winksel & P. Padakannaya (Eds.), South and southeast asian psycholinguisitics (pp. 212–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickard-Liow, S. J., & Lau, L. H. S. (2006). The development of bilingual children’s early spelling in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 868–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard-Liow, S. J., & Lee, L. C. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children’s spelling errors in Malay. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1–2), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard-Liow, S. J., & Poon, K. K. L. (1998). Phonological awareness in multilingual Chinese children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(3), 339–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard-Liow, S. J., & Sze, W. P. (2008). Bilingual language assessment battery (BLAB). In D. o. P. Singapore: Psycholinguistics Lab (Ed.). Singapore: National University of Singapore.

  • Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3), 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K. (2006). Theoretical framework for beginning reading in different orthographies. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 441–462). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, H., Peng, H., & McBride-Chang, C. (2008). Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Developmental Science, 11(1), 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siok, W. T., & Fletcher, P. (2001). The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37(6), 886–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S., & Murray, B. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 934–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (2002). Phonological awareness in Chinese reading. In W. Li, J. S. Gaffney, & J. L. Packard (Eds.), Chinese children’s reading acquisition: Theoretical and pedagogical issues (pp. 39–58). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Preventing early reading failure and its devastating downward spiral. American Educator, 4, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1992). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 67–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C., Hecht, S., Barker, T., Burgess, S., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C., & Pearson, N. A. (2013). Comprehensive test of phonological processing, second edition (CTOPP-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, A. C., Metsala, J. L., & Garlock, V. M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing, 16(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test 4 (WRAT4). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap, M. J., Rickard-Liow, S. J., Jalil, S. B., & Faizal, S. S. B. (2010). The Malay lexicon project: A database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 992–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeong, S., & Rickard-Liow, S. (2012). Development of phonological awareness in English–Mandarin bilinguals: A comparison of English–L1 and Mandarin–L1 kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, S. S., & Chan, C. K. K. (2013). Phonological awareness and oral language proficiency in learning to read English among Chinese kindergarten children in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 550–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Education Research Funding Programme, National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Project No. OER 09/14RB. The views expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of NIE. The authors would like to thank the participating children, parents and schools.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth A. O’Brien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Brien, B.A., Mohamed, M.B.H., Yussof, N.T. et al. The phonological awareness relation to early reading in English for three groups of simultaneous bilingual children. Read Writ 32, 909–937 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9890-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9890-1

Keywords

Navigation