Correction to: Smoking Policy Change Within Permanent Supportive Housing

  • Anne Berit Petersen
  • Holly C. Stewart
  • Jon Walters
  • Maya Vijayaraghavan
Correction
  • 64 Downloads

Correction to: J Community Health (2018) 43:312–320  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0423-7

The original version of this article unfortunately contains mistakes.
  1. 1.

    On page 315, in the last sentence under the “Tobacco Use” subheading, the percentage should read “59.3%” rather than “55.6%”.

     
  2. 2.

    On page 315, in the last sentence under the “Secondhand Smoke Exposure” subheading, the percentage “28.2%” should read “28.6%”.

     
  3. 3.

    The presentation of “Post-policy” and “Pre-policy” terms in the Figs. 1 and 3 were incorrect.

    It should be read as:

    Figure 1: Pre-policy (n = 27); Post-policy (n = 16).

    Figure 3: Pre-policy (n = 55); Post-policy (n = 42).

    The corrected Figs. 1 and 3 are given below.

     
Fig. 1

Current smokers anticipated and reported responses to “proposed” and “current” smoke-free policy. Percent change (95% CI) (a) − 11.0% (− 40.3, 18.3); (b) − 14.9% (− 47.1, 17.3); (c) − 1.5% (− 28.1, 25.0); (d) 13.8% (− 13.8, 41.5)

Fig. 3

Attitudes towards “proposed” and “current” smoke-free policy in pre- and post-implementation samples. Percent change (95% CI): (a) 7.5% (− 12.0, 27.0); (b) 10.3 (− 9.3, 29.8); (c) 18.7% (0.1, 36.7)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Berit Petersen
    • 1
  • Holly C. Stewart
    • 2
  • Jon Walters
    • 3
  • Maya Vijayaraghavan
    • 4
  1. 1.School of NursingLoma Linda UniversityLoma LindaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Housing Innovation PartnersSan DiegoUSA
  4. 4.Division of General Internal Medicine/Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, School of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations