Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 55–70 | Cite as

Information Exchange as a Means of Collusion: The Case of the Italian Car Insurance Market

  • Paolo Coccorese


This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of competition in the Italian car insurance market, where in 2000 the Antitrust Authority imposed a conspicuous fine on 39 companies for their anti-competitive behavior deriving from an ad hoc information exchange from 1994 onwards. Our set of results shows that during the years 1998–2003 the group of firms whose business in the motor segment exceeds 60% of total gross premiums has earned revenues as if it were under monopoly or collusive oligopoly conditions, and therefore appears to support the decision of the Antitrust Authority.


collusion information sharing insurance market structure 

JEL Classification

G22 L13 L41 



I wish to thank the participants at the 12th Global Finance Conference (Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland) and at a workshop organized by the Department of Economics and Statistics of the University of Salerno, where earlier versions of this paper were presented and discussed. I am also grateful to three anonymous referees for their valuable comments.


  1. AGCM., (2003), Indagine conoscitiva sul settore assicurazione autoveicoli, n. 18, Rome.Google Scholar
  2. ANIA., (2002), Italian insurance in 2001, L’Assicurazione Italiana, September, Rome,
  3. Bain, J.S., Relation of profit-rate to industry concentration: american manufacturing, 1936–1940, Q J Econ, vol. 65, pp. 293–324, 1951. doi: 10.2307/1882217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bajtelsmit, V.L., Bouzouita, R., Market structure and performance in private passenger automobile insurance, J Risk Insur, vol. 65, pp. 503–514, 1998. doi: 10.2307/253662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, A.N., Cummins, J.D., Weiss, M.A., Li, H., Conglomeration versus strategic focus: evidence from the insurance industry, J Financ Intermed, vol. 9, pp. 323–362, 2000. doi: 10.1006/jfin.2000.0295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bikker, J.A., Haaf, K., Competition, concentration and their relationships: an empirical analysis of the banking industry, J Bank Finance, vol. 26, pp. 2191–2214, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00205-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bikker, J.A., Spierdijk, L., Finnie, P., Misspecification of the Panzar-Rosse Model: Assessing Competition in the Banking Industry, DNB Working Paper, n. 114, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Bresnahan, T.F., The oligopoly solution concept is identified, Econ Lett, vol. 10, pp. 87–92, 1982. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(82)90121-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bresnahan, T.F., Empirical studies of industries with market power, in Schmalensee, R., and Willig, R.D., (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organisation vol. 2, North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 1011–1057, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Brozen, Y., Concentration Mergers and Public Policy, MacMillan: New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, A.M., An empirical investigation of the structure and performance of the private workers’ compensation market, J Risk Insur, vol. 60, pp. 185–207, 1993. doi: 10.2307/252904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casu, B., Girardone, C., Bank competition, concentration and efficiency in the single European market, Manch Sch, vol. 74, pp. 441–468, 2006. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00503.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi, B.P., Weiss, M.A., An empirical investigation of market structure, efficiency, and performance in property-liability insurance, J Risk Insur, vol. 72, pp. 635–673, 2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2005.00142.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Claessens, S., Laeven, L., What drives bank competition? Some international evidence, J Money Credit Bank, vol. 36(part 2), pp. 563–584, 2004. doi: 10.1353/mcb.2004.0044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coccorese, P., Banking competition and macroeconomic conditions: a disaggregate analysis, J Int Financ Mark Inst Money, vol. 14, pp. 203–219, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2003.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Bandt, O., Davis, E.P., Competition, contestability and market structure in European banking sectors on the eve of EMU, J Bank Finance, vol. 24, pp. 1045–1066, 2000. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00117-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demsetz, H., Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy, J Law Econ, vol. 16, pp. 1–9, 1973. doi: 10.1086/466752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demsetz, H., Two systems of belief about monopoly, in Goldschmid, H.J., Mann, H.M., and Weston, J.F. (eds.), Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, Little Brown: Boston, pp. 164–184, 1974.Google Scholar
  19. Doyle, M.P., Snyder, C.M., Information sharing and competition in the motor vehicle industry, J Polit Econ, vol. 107, pp. 1326–1364, 1999. doi: 10.1086/250099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gelos, R.G., Roldos, J., Consolidation and market structure in emerging market banking systems, Emerg Mark Rev, vol. 5, pp. 39–59, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2003.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert, R.A., Bank market structure and competition: a survey, J Money Credit Bank, vol. 16, pp. 617–645, 1984. doi: 10.2307/1992096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green, E.J., Porter, R.H., Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information, Econometrica, vol. 52, pp. 87–100, 1984. doi: 10.2307/1911462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grillo, M., Collusion and facilitating practices: a new perspective in antitrust analysis, Eur J Law Econ, vol. 141, vol. 151–169, 2002. doi: 10.1023/A:1016506925486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ISVAP., L’Assicurazione RC Auto in Italia: Analisi e Proposte, Rome. 2000.Google Scholar
  25. Iwata, G., Measurement of conjectural variations in oligopoly, Econometrica, vol. 42, pp. 947–966, 1974. doi: 10.2307/1913800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuhn, K.-U., Fighting collusion: regulation of communication between firms, Econ Policy, vol. 32, pp. 1–37, 2001.Google Scholar
  27. Kuhn, K.U., Vives, X., Information exchanges among firms and their impact on competition, Office for Official Publications of the European Community: Luxemburg, 1995.Google Scholar
  28. Lau, L., On identifying the degree of competitiveness from industry price and output data, Econ Lett, vol. 10, pp. 93–99, 1982. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(82)90122-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mason, E.S., Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise, Am Econ Rev, vol. 29, pp. 61–74, 1939.Google Scholar
  30. Molyneux, P., Lloyd-Williams, D.M., Thornton, J., Competitive conditions in European banking, J Bank Finance, vol. 18, pp. 445–459, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0378-4266(94)90003-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murat, G., Tonkin, R.S., Jüttner, D.J., Competition in the general insurance industry, Z Gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, vol. 91, pp. 453–481, 2002.Google Scholar
  32. Nathan, A., Neave, E.H., Competition and contestability in Canada’s financial system: empirical results, Can J Econ, vol. 22, pp. 576–594, 1989. doi: 10.2307/135541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newey, W., West, K., A simple positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix, Econometrica, vol. 55, pp. 703–708, 1987. doi: 10.2307/1913610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nitsche, R., von Hinten-Reed, N., Competitive impacts on information exchange, Charles River Associates: Brussels, 2004.Google Scholar
  35. Novshek, W., Sonnenschein, H., Fulfilled expectations Cournot duopoly with information acquisition and release, Bell J Econ, vol. 13, pp. 214–218. doi: 10.2307/3003442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pagano, M., Jappelli, T., Information sharing in credit markets, J Finance, vol. 43, pp. 1693–1718, 1993. doi: 10.2307/2329064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Panzar, J.C., Rosse, J.N., Testing for monopoly equilibrium, J Ind Econ, vol. 25, pp. 443–456, 1987. doi: 10.2307/2098582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peltzman, S., The gains and losses from industrial concentration, J Law Econ, vol. 20, pp. 229–263, 1977. doi: 10.1086/466902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porrini, D., Information exchange as collusive behaviour: evidence from an antitrust intervention in the Italian insurance market, Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract, vol. 29, pp. 219–233, 2004. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0440.2004.00283.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosse, J.N., Panzar, J.C., Chamberlin vs. Robinson: an empirical test for monopoly rents, Economics Discussion Paper, n. 90, Bell Laboratories. 1977.Google Scholar
  41. Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.E., Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information, Q J Econ, vol. 90, pp. 629–650, 1976. doi: 10.2307/1885326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scalera, D., Zazzaro, A., The unpleasant effects of price deregulation in the European third-party motor insurance market: a theoretical framework, The B.E. J Econ Anal Policy, 7(1). article 50. 2007.Google Scholar
  43. Shaffer, S., A non-structural test for competition in financial markets, in Bank Structure and Competition, Conference Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago: Chicago, 225–243, 1982.Google Scholar
  44. Shaffer, S., A test of competition in Canadian banking, J Money Credit Bank, vol. 25, pp. 49–61, 1993. doi: 10.2307/2077819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Souma, T., Tsutsui, Y., Recent competition in Japanese life insurance industry Discussion Paper 637, Institute of Social and Economic Research: Osaka University, 2005.Google Scholar
  46. Staikouras, C.K., Koutsomanoli-Fillipaki, A., Competition and concentration in the new European banking landscape, Eur Financ Manag, vol. 12, pp. 443–482, 2006. doi: 10.1111/j.1354-7798.2006.00327.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stigler, G.L., A theory of oligopoly, J Polit Econ, vol. 72, pp. 44–61, 1964. doi: 10.1086/258853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turchetti, G., Daraio, C., How deregulation shapes market structure and industry efficiency: the case of the Italian motor insurance industry, Geneva Pap Risk Insur, vol. 29, pp. 202–218, 2004. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0440.2004.00282.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vesala, J., Testing for competition in banking: behavioural evidence from Finland, Working Paper E:1, Bank of Finland Studies, 1995.Google Scholar
  50. Vives, X., Private information, strategic behaviour and efficiency in Cournot markets, Rand J Econ, vol. 33, pp. 361–376, 2002. doi: 10.2307/3087462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weiss, L.W., The concentration-profits relationship and antitrust, in Goldschmid, H.J., Mann, H.M., and Weston, J.F. (eds.), Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, Little Brown: Chicago, pp. 184–233, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Statistics, CELPE and CSEFUniversity of SalernoSalernoItaly

Personalised recommendations