Abstract
In this qualitative case study, the researchers explored 3 8th grade teachers’ formative assessment practices as it occurred during their mathematics instruction at socioeconomic status (SES)-different schools in Taiwan. Instructionally embedded formative assessment we refer to as discourse-based assessment practice (DAP). In Taiwan, there is a large mathematics achievement gap among high SES and low SES and minority students in 8th grade. Addressing this issue at the level of classroom practice, we attempt to document teachers’ DAP using a parsimonious, but practical framework for analyzing classroom discourse in 23 lessons. For the purpose of this study, 3 lessons for each teacher are represented. The extended sequence (Mehan, 1979) was the primary unit of analysis, to which we applied our framework for illuminating and differentiating the teachers’ press for student understanding through questions and feedback. The analysis of the teacher’s instruction at the high SES indicated that it was more formative than the others, pressing for mathematical understanding. The 2 teachers at the low SES schools pressed for rote understanding, though there were qualitative differences between them. The findings raise more questions and implications for research and education policy. In Taiwan where there is scant research on classroom practices, DAP as an instructional improvement may be a starting point for educational improvement for all its students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K. & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.
Black, P. J. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Black, P. J. & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage.
Bray, W. S. (2011). A collective case study of the influence of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge on error-handling practices during class discussion of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(1), 2–38.
Cazden, C. B. & Beck, S. W. (2003). Classroom discourse. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher & S. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 165–197). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chang, F. C. (2006).
:以2003
[Using structural equation modeling to test the student’s achievement impacted factors: Taiwan’s grade 8 in TIMSS 2003]. Journal of National Taipei University of Education, 19(2), 163–196.Chang, F. C. (2007). 新移民子女的研究界說 [The review of research on children born to foreign mothers]. In F. C. Chang et al. (Eds.), Education of children born to foreign mothers (pp. 1–24). Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological.
Chen, Y. C. & Liu, T. M. (2008). 教育成就與城鄉差距:空間群聚之分析 [Educational attainment and urban/rural discrepancy: An analysis of spatial cluster]. Journal of Population Studies, 37, 1–43.
Cheng, K. & Hung, C. C. (2006). 誰是台灣頂尖高等教育學府的學生 [Who are the students of the top universities in Taiwan]. Paper presented at the meeting of The Establishment of Database of Higher Education in Taiwan and of Related Issues Regarding the Database. Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Erickson, F. (2007). Some thoughts on “proximal” formative assessment of student learning. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making: 106th yearbook of the national society for the study of education (Vol. 1, pp. 186–216). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Fann, L. J. (2007). 台灣弱勢者教育的現況分析與未來展望 [Education for disadvantaged groups: Lessons learnt, future considerations]. Educational Resources and Research, Special Issue, 77–90.
Fennema, E. & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 147–164). New York: Macmillan.
Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
Haycock, K. (2007). Improving achievement and closing gaps between groups: The role of assessment in helping US move further, faster. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment (pp. 53–82). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
Hoetker, J. & Ahlbrand, W. P. (1969). The persistance of recitation. American Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 145–167.
Hsueh, C. T. (2007). 近十年台灣家庭變遷—新移民與新台灣之子現象 [The change of Taiwanese family structure in the past ten years—the appearance of new immigrants and children born to foreign mothers]. Retrieved from http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/096/SS-B-096-006.htm
Lin, C. Y. & Hwang, Y. J. (2008). 影響臺灣地區學生學業成就的可能機制:結構方程模式的探究 [The possible mechanism influencing junior high school students’ achievement in Taiwan: The exploration of structural equation modeling]. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(1), 45–88.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J. & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O. & Pierre, F. (2009). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
National Center for Education Statistics (2009). The nation’s report card: Mathematics 2009 (NCES 2010–451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Oakes, J. (2008). Keeping track: Structuring equality and inequality in an era of accountability. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 700–712.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
Stigler, J. W. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
Sun, M. I. & Tsai, M. H. (2007). 社經地位和學生學業成就關係之後設分析 [The relationship of socioeconomic status and academic achievement-a meta analysis]. 國教學報, 19, 199–221.
Taiwan Ministry of Education (2003). 教育部九十二年度推動教育優先區計畫 [The project of educational priority area]. Retrieved from http://cyeb.cy.edu.tw/c/Attachment/92_precedence.pdf
Taiwan Ministry of Education (2004). 教育政策白皮書初稿 [The draft of Taiwanese educational white paper]. Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/EDURES/EDU6239001/930401.htm? search
Taiwan Ministry of Education (2007). 教育基本法 [Educational Fundamental Act]. Retrieved from http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/Fnews/FnewsContent.asp?msgid=2855&msgType=en&keyword=undefined
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.
Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Transana™ 2.41 [Computer software] (2009). Madison, WI: The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. Available: http://www.transana.org
Tunstall, P. & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389–404.
Walshaw, M. & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551.
Wang, L. Y. & Chen, H. L. (2007). 台灣偏遠地區教育機會均等政策模式之分析與反省 [Models of equal educational opportunity policies for rural areas in Taiwan: Synthesis and reflections]. 教育資料集刊, 36, 25–46.
Wang, S. Y., Wen, S. M. L., Xie, Y. H., Huang, N. Y., Huang, C. L., Chen, Y. C. & Liao, Y. J. (2006). 我國新移民子女學習成就現況之研究 [The study for learning performance of immigrant children in Taiwan]. Educational Resources and Research, 68, 137–170.
Webb, D. C. (2004). Enriching assessment opportunities through classroom discourse. In T. A. Romberg (Ed.), Standards-based mathematics assessment in middle school (pp. 169–187). New York: Teachers College Press.
Wiliam, D. (2006). Formative assessment: Getting the focus right. Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 283–289.
Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In K. L. Frank Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Wood, T. (1994). Patterns of interaction and the culture of mathematics classrooms. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Cultural perspectives of the mathematics classroom (Vol. 14, pp. 149–168). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Wood, T., Williams, G. & McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222–255.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed., Vol. 5). Los Angeles: Sage.
:以2003
[Using structural equation modeling to test the student’s achievement impacted factors: Taiwan’s grade 8 in TIMSS 2003]. Journal of National Taipei University of Education, 19(2), 163–196.Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Chang-Hua Chen and Michele D. Crockett share first authorship on this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, CH., Crockett, M.D., Namikawa, T. et al. EIGHTH GRADE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT PRACTICES IN SES-DIFFERENT CLASSROOMS: A TAIWAN STUDY. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 10, 553–579 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9299-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9299-7