Advertisement

USING THE DAST-C TO EXPLORE COLOMBIAN AND BOLIVIAN STUDENTS’ IMAGES OF SCIENTISTS

  • William Medina-Jerez
  • Kyndra V. Middleton
  • Walter Orihuela-Rabaza
Article

Abstract

The way in which students view science and its practitioners, particularly during their late elementary and early secondary grade levels, has been at the core of numerous studies dating back to research by Mead & Metraux (Science 126:384–390, 1957). In this study, we used the Draw-a-Scientist Test Checklist developed by Finson, Beaver & Cramond (Sch Sci Math 95(4):195–205, 1995) to explore and document Colombian and Bolivian students’ perceptions of scientists. Despite the wealth of information from years of study, there is a lack of research on images held by students in Latin American nations. This study involved Colombian and Bolivian students (N = 1,017) in 5th to 11th grades and was aimed at providing an original account of how these students picture scientists and science. Results suggest differences on how students perceive scientists based on nationality, grade and school type. We discuss how features may be associated with educational and socioeconomic status in each school community.

Key words

images Latin America perception school science scientists 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, D. & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barman, C. (1996). How do students really view science and scientists? Science & Children, 34(1), 30–33.Google Scholar
  3. Barman, C. (1997). Students’ views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science & Children, 35(1), 18–23.Google Scholar
  4. Barman, C. R., Ostlund, K. L., Gatto, C. C., & Halferty. M. (1997). Fifth grade students’ perceptions about scientists and how they study and use science. Paper presented at the Association for the Education of Science Teachers 1997 Conference.Google Scholar
  5. Bodzin, A., & Gehringer, M. (2001). Breaking science stereotypes. Science and Children, 38, 36–41Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. R. (1991). The roots of gender inequity in technical areas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlton-Parsons, E. (1997). Black high school females’ images of the scientist: Expression of culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 745–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67, 255–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Contreras, M. E., & Talavera-Simoni, M. L. (2003). The Bolivian education reform 1992–2002: Case studies in large-scale education reform. The World Bank Education reform and management publication series. Vol. II, No. 2. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Farland, D., & McComas, W. (2008). Deconstructing the DAST (Draw-a-Scientist-Test): Considering the validity and reliability of E-DAST (enhanced DAST). Annual meeting of the School Science and Mathematics Association. Missoula, MT.Google Scholar
  11. Farland-Smith, D., Finson, K., Boone, W., & Yale, M. (2010). Investigating the sources of images students hold about scientists through application of Rasch analysis. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual International Conference of the Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE). Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Faye-Neathery, M. (1997). Elementary and secondary students’ perceptions toward science: Correlations with gender, ethnicity, ability, grade, and science achievement. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2(1).Google Scholar
  13. Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. V., & Cramond, V. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finson, K. D., Pedersen, J., & Thomas, J. (2006). Comparing science teaching styles to students’ perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 106(1), 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Human Development Index (2009). Human development reports. Retrieved April 5, 2010, Web site: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/
  16. Jimenez, E. & Lockheed, M. E. (1995). Public and private education in developing countries: A comparative study. World Bank discussion papers. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, R., & Bangert, A. (2006). The CSI effect: Changing the face of science. Science Scope, 30, 38–42.Google Scholar
  18. Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
  19. Koren, P, & Bar. V. (2009). Science and its images—promise and threat: From classic literature to contemporary students’ images of science and the scientist. Interchange, 40(2), 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. La Opinión [The Opinion] (2004). Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.laopinion.com.co.
  21. Long, M., & Steinke, J. (1994). Images of science and scientists on children’s educational science programs. Paper presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  22. Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “draw a scientist test” among young children. International Journal of Science Education. 30(6), 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lunn, M., & Noble, A. (2008). Re-visioning science “love and passion in the scientific imagination.” International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luykx, A. (1999). The citizen factory: Schooling and cultural production in Bolivia. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mason, C. L., Butler-Kahle, J., & Gardner, A. L. (1991). Draw-a-scientist test: Implications. School Science and Mathematics, 91(5), 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matkins, J. J. (1996). Customizing the draw-a-scientist test to analyze the effect that teachers have on their students’ perceptions and attitudes toward science. Paper presented at the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science conference.Google Scholar
  27. McComas, W. F. & Farland, D. (2007). The enhanced DAST: Technical aspects of a new measure of assessing students’ views of scientists. Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans, LA, April.Google Scholar
  28. Mead, M. and Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high-school students: A pilot study, Science, 126, 384–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Medina-Jerez, W., Taylor, C., & Bryant, C. (2009). The implementation of Project Citizen in Bolivian schools: Perspectives from three teacher educators. International Journal of Progressive Education, 5, 6–24.Google Scholar
  30. Monhardt, R. M. (2003). The image of the scientist through the eyes of Navajo children. Journal of American Indian Education, 42(3), 25–39.Google Scholar
  31. Moseley, C., & Norris, D. (1999). Pre-service teachers’ views of scientists. Science and Children, 37, 50–53.Google Scholar
  32. Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología [Colombian Observatory of Science and Technology (OCyT)] (2004). Retrieved April 5, 2010, from http://ocyt.org.co/html/.
  33. Painter, J., Jones, M. G., Tretter, T. R., & Kubasko, D. (2006). Pulling back the curtain: Uncovering and changing students’ perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Picker, S., & Berry, J. S. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pineda, D. (2003). Communication of science in Colombia. Science Editor, 26(3), 91–92.Google Scholar
  36. Quiroga, E. (2007). Políticas a favor de la mujer en la ciencia (Policies supporting women in science). Paper presented at the Workshop on the participation on women in science, technology, engineering, and innovation in South America. Santiago de Chile, Chile.Google Scholar
  37. Quita, I. N. (2003). What is a scientist? Perspectives of teachers of color. Multicultural Education, 11(1), 29–31.Google Scholar
  38. Raty, H., & Snellman, L. (1997). Children’s images of an intelligent person. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 773–784.Google Scholar
  39. Reis, P., & Galvão, C. (2004). Socio-scientific controversies and students’ conceptions about scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1621–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Renoe, S. (2003). The draw an archaeologist test: A good way to get the ball rolling. Science Activities, 40(3), 31–36.Google Scholar
  41. Rodriguez Sala de Gómezgil, M. L. (1975). Mexican adolescents’ image of the scientist. Social Studies of Science, 5, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenthal, D. B. (1993). Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics, 93(4), 212–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubin, E., & Cohen, A. (2003). The images of scientists and science among Hebrew and Arabic-speaking pre-service teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 821–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schibeci, R. A., & Sorenson, I. (1983). Elementary school children’s perception of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83, 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. She, H. (1998) Gender and grade level differences in Taiwan students’ stereotypes of science and scientists, Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skolnick, J., Langbort, C. & Day, L. (1982). How to encourage girls in math and science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Song, J., & Kim, K. (1999). How Korean students see scientists: The images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steinke, J. (1998). Connecting theory and practice: Women scientist in television programming. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42(2), 142–152.Google Scholar
  49. Symington, D., & Spurling, H. (1990). The ‘draw a scientist test’: Interpreting the data. Research in Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 75–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas, J., & Hairston, R., (2003). Adolescent students’ images of an environmental scientist: An opportunity for constructivist teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  51. Thomas, M, D., Henley, T. B., & Snell, C. M. (1996). The draw a scientist test: A different population and a somewhat different story. College Student Journal, 40(1), 140–148.Google Scholar
  52. Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (Eds.). (1987). Exemplary practice in science and mathematics education. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
  53. Türkmen, H. (2008).Turkish primary students’ perceptions about scientist and what factors affecting the image of the scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 55–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Medina-Jerez
    • 1
  • Kyndra V. Middleton
    • 2
  • Walter Orihuela-Rabaza
    • 3
  1. 1.University of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Howard UniversityWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Science Teacher at Juan Lechin Oquendo High SchoolLa PazBolivia

Personalised recommendations