Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 264, Issue 1–2, pp 213–234 | Cite as

A directional semi-oriented radial DEA measure: an application on financial stability and the efficiency of banks

  • Sepideh Kaffash
  • Reza Kazemi Matin
  • Mohammad Tajik
Original Research
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a widely used non-parametric technique for measuring the relative efficiencies of decision-making units with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. The main caveat of traditional DEA models is that they are applicable to positive inputs and outputs, while negative data are commonly present in most real applications. To accommodate variables that can take both negative and positive values, Emrouznejad et al. (Eur J Oper Res 200(1):297–304, 2010a) introduced the Semi-Oriented Radial Measure (SORM) model, which was later modified by Kazemi Matin et al. (Measurement 54:152–158, 2014). The present study proposes a new version of the modified SORM model, using directional distance function and choosing a relevant direction to efficiently deal with variables with both positive and negative values. Our Directional SORM (DSORM) model is superior to its predecessors from both computational and target settings perspectives while it allows for the dual formulation of linear programming. To illustrate our proposed model, we employ two widely used selections of inputs and outputs to estimate the efficiency scores for a sample of banks operating in Persian Gulf Council Countries (GCC) over the period of 2002–2011. The estimated efficiency scores are then used to study the impact of financial system stability on technical efficiency of individual banks.

Keywords

Negative data in data envelopment analysis Modified SORM, Directional SORM model GCC banks Financial stability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For the second author, the research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (GACR) within the project 17-23495S

References

  1. Agee, M. D., Atkinson, S. E., & Crocker, T. D. (2012). Child maturation, time-invariant, and time-varying inputs: Their interaction in the production of child human capital. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, A. I., & Seiford, L. M. (1990). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research Letters, 9(6), 403–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allahyar, M., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2015). Negative data in data envelopment analysis: Efficiency analysis and estimating returns to scale. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 82, 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anouze, A. L., & Emrouznejad, A. (2009). Efficiency analysis of Islamic banks: A case of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). In 23rd European conference on operational research (pp. 76–77).Google Scholar
  5. Avkiran, N. K. (1999). The evidence on efficiency gains: The role of mergers and the benefits to the public. Journal of Banking and Finance, 23(7), 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avkiran, N. K. (2000). Rising productivity of Australian trading banks under deregulation 1986–1995. Journal of Economics and Finance, 24(2), 122–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Avkiran, N. K. (2009). Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: An illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data. Omega, 37(3), 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avkiran, N. K. (2011). Association of DEA super-efficiency estimates with financial ratios: Investigating the case for Chinese banks. Omega, 39(3), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Avkiran, N. K., & Thoraneenitiyan, N. (2010). Purging data before productivity analysis. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barros, C. P., Barroso, N., & Borges, M. R. (2005). Evaluating the efficiency and productivity of insurance companies with a Malmquist Index: A case study for Portugal. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 30(2), 244–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(2), 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belanès, A., Ftiti, Z., & Regaïeg, R. (2015). What can we learn about Islamic banks efficiency under the subprime crisis? Evidence from GCC region. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 33, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(7), 895–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C. K., & Sahay, P. (1997). The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 332–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bradley, S., Johnes, J., & Little, A. (2010). Measurement and determinants of efficiency and productivity in the further education sector in England. Bulletin of Economic Research, 62(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Branda, M. (2016). Mean-value at risk portfolio efficiency: approaches based on data envelopment analysis models with negative data and their empirical behaviour. 4OR, 14(1), 77–99.Google Scholar
  17. Brockett, P. L., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z. M., & Sun, D. B. (1997). Data transformations in DEA cone ratio envelopment approaches for monitoring bank performances. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 250–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70(2), 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng, G., Zervopoulos, P., & Qian, Z. (2013). A variant of radial measure capable of dealing with negative inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chortareas, G. E., Girardone, C., & Ventouri, A. (2012). Bank supervision, regulation, and efficiency: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of Financial Stability, 8(4), 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Čihák, M., & Hesse, H. (2008). Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis. In IMF Working Papers (pp. 1–29)Google Scholar
  23. El Moussawi, C., & Obeid, H. (2011). Evaluating the productive efficiency of Islamic banking in GCC: A non-parametric approach. International Management Review, 7(1), 10.Google Scholar
  24. Eling, M., & Luhnen, M. (2010). Efficiency in the international insurance industry: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(7), 1497–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Emrouznejad, A., Amin, G. R., Thanassoulis, E., & Anouze, A. L. (2010b). On the boundedness of the SORM DEA models with negative data. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(1), 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Emrouznejad, A., Anouze, A. L., & Thanassoulis, E. (2010a). A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. (2017). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 1–5.Google Scholar
  28. Gadanecz, B., & Jayaram, K. (2008). Measures of financial stability–A review. Irving Fisher Committee Bulletin, 31, 365–383.Google Scholar
  29. Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hassan, T., Mohamad, S., Khaled, I., & Bader, M. (2009). Efficiency of conventional versus Islamic banks: Evidence from the middle east. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 2(1), 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Izadikhah, M., & Saen, R. F. (2016). Evaluating sustainability of supply chains by two-stage range directional measure in the presence of negative data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 49, 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnes, J., Izzeldin, M., & Pappas, V. (2009). Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banks: A comparison based on financial ratios and data envelopment analysis. In Economics working paper series. The Economics Department, Lancaster UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnes, J., Izzeldin, M., & Pappas, V. (2014). A comparison of performance of Islamic and conventional banks 2004–2009. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 103, S93–S107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaffash, S., & Marra, M. (2017). Data envelopment analysis in financial services: A citations network analysis of banks, insurance companies and money market funds. Annals of Operations Research, 253(1), 307–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaffash, S., Moscone F., & Aktas, E. (2014). Oil price and bank performance in the Middle Eastern oil exporting countries, Ph.D. Thesis, Brunel UniversityGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaffash, S., & Torshizi, M. (2017). Data envelopment analysis development in banking sector. Handbook of Research on Emergent Applications of Optimization Algorithms, p. 462.Google Scholar
  37. Kazemi Matin, R., Amin, G. R., & Emrouznejad, A. (2014). A modified semi-oriented radial measure for target setting with negative data. Measurement, 54, 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kazemi Matin, R., & Azizi, R. (2011). A two-phase approach for setting targets in DEA with negative data. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(12), 5794–5803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kerstens, K., & Van de Woestyne, I. (2011). Negative data in DEA: A simple proportional distance function approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1413–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Konishi, M., & Yasuda, Y. (2004). Factors affecting bank risk taking: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(1), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leightner, J. E., & Lovell, C. K. (1998). The impact of financial liberalization on the performance of Thai banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 50(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leleu, H. (2013). Shadow pricing of undesirable outputs in nonparametric analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 231(2), 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W., & Lin, B. J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lovell, C. K. (1995). Measuring the macroeconomic performance of the Taiwanese economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 39(1), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lovell, C. K., & Pastor, J. T. (1995). Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Operations Research Letters, 18(3), 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller, S. M., & Noulas, A. G. (1996). The technical efficiency of large bank production. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20(3), 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Olson, D., & Zoubi, T. A. (2008). Using accounting ratios to distinguish between Islamic and conventional banks in the GCC region. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(1), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Olson, D., & Zoubi, T. A. (2012). The impact of the global financial crisis on the profitability of islamic and conventional banks in Asia and the Middle East. IX KIMEP International Research Conference (KIRC-2012). Central Asia: Regionalization vs. Globalization April 19–21, 2012Google Scholar
  49. Pastor, J. T. (1996). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: A generalization. Annals of Operations Research, 66(2), 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Portela, M. C., & Thanassoulis, E. (2010). Malmquist-type indices in the presence of negative data: An application to bank branches. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(7), 1472–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Portela, M., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1111–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosman, R., Wahab, N. A., & Zainol, Z. (2014). Efficiency of Islamic banks during the financial crisis: An analysis of Middle Eastern and Asian countries. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 28, 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sahoo, B. K., Khoveyni, M., Eslami, R., & Chaudhury, P. (2016). Returns to scale and most productive scale size in DEA with negative data. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(2), 545–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharp, J. A., Meng, W., & Liu, W. (2007). A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with ‘natural’ negative outputs and inputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(12), 1672–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Srairi, S. A. (2010). Cost and profit efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks in GCC countries. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the answer? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sturm, J., & Williams, B. (2004). Foreign bank entry, deregulation and bank efficiency: Lessons from the Australian experience. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(7), 1775–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sufian, F. (2009). Determinants of bank efficiency during unstable macroeconomic environment: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Research in International Business and Finance, 23(1), 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sufian, F., & Habibullah, M. S. (2011). Opening the black box on bank efficiency in China: Does economic freedom matter? Global Economic Review, 40(3), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Toloo, M., Zandi, A., & Emrouznejad, A. (2015). Evaluation efficiency of large-scale data set with negative data: An artificial neural network approach. The Journal of Supercomputing, 71(7), 2397–2411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vardanyan, M., & Noh, D. (2006). Approximating pollution abatement costs via alternative specifications of a multi-output production technology: A case of the US electric utility industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 80(2), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang, K., Xian, Y., Lee, C., Wei, Y., & Huang, Z. (2017). On selecting directions for directional distance functions in a non-parametric framework: A review. Annals of Operations Research, 1–34  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2423-5
  65. Widiarto, I., & Emrouznejad, A. (2015). Social and financial efficiency of Islamic microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis application. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 50, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sepideh Kaffash
    • 1
  • Reza Kazemi Matin
    • 2
  • Mohammad Tajik
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information System and Operation ManagementSuffolk UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Karaj BranchIslamic Azad UniversityKarajIran
  3. 3.Department of Economics and FinanceBrunel UniversityUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations