Abstract
The implementation of nanotechnology in drinking water treatment is a very promising field for applied research. A major part of this effort focuses on the reduction of the dimensionality of the conventional cost-effective adsorbents that have been successfully used for decades. The development of engineered nanoparticles has the potential to provide improved uptake efficiencies and sustainability if issues related to cost, technical incorporation and environmental safety are overcome. In this study, we review: (1) the technical and economic conditions for potential implementation of inorganic nanoparticles as alternative adsorbents of heavy metals from drinking water, (2) the reported studies referring to the capture of heavy metals ionic forms by inorganic nanoparticles giving emphasis to those succeeding residual concentrations below the regulation limit and (3) the indirect health and environmental risk related to the application of nanosized materials in a water treatment line. A part of the review is devoted to the identification of an optimum nanoparticle profile that complies with the unique characteristics for each and every heavy metal with respect to the chemical affinity, charge interactions, aqueous speciation, redox reactions and ion-exchange processes. Importantly, in order to bridge fundamental research with the requirements of the technical and commercial sector dealing with water treatment plants, we introduce an evaluation path for the preliminary qualification of candidate nanoparticulate materials, based on a universal index which is derived by adsorption isotherms recorded under realistic conditions of application.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeleye AS, Conway JR, Garner K et al (2016) Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: costs, benefits, and applicability. Chem Eng J 286:640–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.105
Afkhami A, Norooz-Asl R (2009) Removal, preconcentration and determination of Mo(VI) from water and wastewater samples using maghemite nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 346:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.05.024
Anjum NA, Gill SS, Duarte AC et al (2013) Silver nanoparticles in soil-plant systems. J Nanoparticle Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1896-7
Batley GE, Kirby JK, McLaughlin MJ (2013) Fate and risks of nanomaterials in aquatic and terrestrial environments. Acc Chem Res 46:854–862. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar2003368
Ben-Moshe T, Frenk S, Dror I et al (2013) Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles on soil properties. Chemosphere 90:640–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.018
Bernhardt ES, Colman BP, Hochella MF et al (2010) An ecological perspective on nanomaterial impacts in the environment. J Environ Qual 39:1954–1965. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0479
Boparai HK, Joseph M, O’Carroll DM (2011) Kinetics and thermodynamics of cadmium ion removal by adsorption onto nano zerovalent iron particles. J Hazard Mater 186:458–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.029
California Office of Administrative Law (1985) California code of regulations. California waste extraction test, 22 CA ADC Appendix II.
Camtakan Z, Erenturk SA, Yusan SD (2012) Magnesium oxide nanoparticles: preparation, characterization, and uranium sorption properties. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 31:536–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10575
Cornell RM, Schwertmann U (2003) The iron oxides: structure, properties, reactions, occurrences, and uses. Wiley, New York
Cui H, Su Y, Li Q et al (2013) Exceptional arsenic (III, V) removal performance of highly porous, nanostructured ZrO2 spheres for fixed bed reactors and the full-scale system modeling. Water Res 47:6258–6268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.040
Dai Y, Hu Y, Jiang B et al (2016) Carbothermal synthesis of ordered mesoporous carbon-supported nano zero-valent iron with enhanced stability and activity for hexavalent chromium reduction. J Hazard Mater 309:249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.013
Dey A, Singh R, Purkait MK (2014) Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles aggregated schwertmannite: a novel adsorbent for the efficient removal of arsenic. J Water Process Eng 3:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.07.002
Dimiropoulos V, Katsoyiannis IA, Zouboulis AI et al (2015) Enhanced U(VI) removal from drinking water by nanostructured binary Fe/Mn oxy-hydroxides. J Water Process Eng 7:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.06.014
Du W, Tan W, Peralta-Videa JR et al (2016) Interaction of metal oxide nanoparticles with higher terrestrial plants: physiological and biochemical aspects. Plant Physiol Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.024
Engates KE, Shipley HJ (2011) Adsorption of Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, and Ni to titanium dioxide nanoparticles: effect of particle size, solid concentration, and exhaustion. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:386–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0382-3
European Standard EN 12457-4 (2002) Characterization of waste-leaching-compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludge-part 1: one stage batch test at a liquid to solid ratio of 10 L/kg for materials with high solid content and with particle size below 10 mm. (without or with size reduction)
Fu Y, Wang J, Liu Q, Zeng H (2014) Water-dispersible magnetic nanoparticle–graphene oxide composites for selenium removal. Carbon N Y 77:710–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.076
Fu R, Zhang X, Xu Z et al (2017) Fast and highly efficient removal of chromium (VI) using humus-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron: influencing factors, kinetics and mechanism. Sep Purif Technol 174:362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.058
Garcia S, Sardar S, Maldonado S et al (2014) Study of As(III) and As(V) oxoanion adsorption onto single and mixed ferrite and hausmannite nanomaterials. Microchem J 117:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2014.06.008
Ge Y, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2011) Evidence for negative effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environ Sci Technol 45:1659–1664. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103040t
Goldberg S, Forster HS, Godfrey CL (1996) Molybdenum adsorption on oxides, clay minerals, and soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:425–432. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000020013x
Gómez-Pastora J, Bringas E, Ortiz I (2014) Recent progress and future challenges on the use of high performance magnetic nano-adsorbents in environmental applications. Chem Eng J 256:187–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.119
Gómez-Pastora J, Dominguez S, Bringas E et al (2017) Review and perspectives on the use of magnetic nanophotocatalysts (MNPCs) in water treatment. Chem Eng J 310:407–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.140
Gupta A, Yunus M, Sankararamakrishnan N (2012) Zerovalent iron encapsulated chitosan nanospheres—a novel adsorbent for the removal of total inorganic arsenic from aqueous systems. Chemosphere 86:150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.10.003
Gusain D, Singh PK, Sharma YC (2016) Kinetic and equilibrium modelling of adsorption of cadmium on nano crystalline zirconia using response surface methodology. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 6:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2016.07.002
Hakami O, Zhang Y, Banks CJ (2012) Thiol-functionalised mesoporous silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles for high efficiency removal and recovery of Hg from water. Water Res 46:3913–3922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.032
Hang C, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2012) As(III) and As(V) adsorption by hydrous zirconium oxide nanoparticles synthesized by a hydrothermal process followed with heat treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:353–361. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie202260g
Hossain Z, Mustafa G, Komatsu S (2015) Plant responses to nanoparticle stress. Int J Mol Sci 16:26644–26653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161125980
Jing C, Meng X, Calvache E, Jiang G (2009) Remediation of organic and inorganic arsenic contaminated groundwater using a nanocrystalline TiO2-based adsorbent. Environ Pollut 157:2514–2519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.03.011
Kanel SR, Manning B, Charlet L, Choi H (2005) Removal of arsenic(III) from groundwater by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol 39:1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048991u
Kanel SR, Greneche JM, Choi H (2006) Arsenic(V) removal from groundwater using nano scale zero-valent iron as a colloidal reactive barrier material. Environ Sci Technol 40:2045–2050. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0520924
Kaprara E, Kazakis N, Simeonidis K et al (2015) Occurrence of Cr(VI) in drinking water of Greece and relation to the geological background. J Hazard Mater 281:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.084
Kaprara E, Simeonidis K, Zouboulis A, Mitrakas M (2016) Rapid small-scale column tests for Cr(VI) removal by granular magnetite. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 16:525–532. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2015.164
Kaprara E, Tziarou N, Kalaitzidou K et al (2017) The use of Sn(II) oxy-hydroxides for the effective removal of Cr(VI) from water: optimization of synthesis parameters. Sci Total Environ 605:190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.199
Kazakis N, Kantiranis N, Voudouris KS et al (2015) Geogenic Cr oxidation on the surface of mafic minerals and the hydrogeological conditions influencing hexavalent chromium concentrations in groundwater. Sci Total Environ 514:224–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.080
Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE et al (2008) Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1825–1851. https://doi.org/10.1897/08-090.1
Kokkinos E, Simeonidis K, Pinakidou F et al (2017) Optimization of tetravalent manganese feroxyhyte’s negative charge density: a high-performing mercury adsorbent from drinking water. Sci Total Environ 574:482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.068
Kokkinos E, Soukakos K, Kostoglou M, Mitrakas M (2018) Cadmium, mercury, and nickel adsorption by tetravalent manganese feroxyhyte: selectivity, kinetic modeling, and thermodynamic study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:12263–12273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9738-2
Lata S, Samadder SR (2016) Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: a review. J Environ Manag 166:387–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.039
Li R, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2012) Exceptional arsenic adsorption performance of hydrous cerium oxide nanoparticles: part A. Adsorption capacity and mechanism. Chem Eng J 185–186:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.061
Li Z-J, Wang L, Yuan L-Y et al (2015) Efficient removal of uranium from aqueous solution by zero-valent iron nanoparticle and its graphene composite. J Hazard Mater 290:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.028
Liddell HG, Scott R, Jones HS, McKenzie R (1996) A Greek–English lexicon. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Ling L, Pan B, Zhang W (2015) Removal of selenium from water with nanoscale zero-valent iron: mechanisms of intraparticle reduction of Se(IV). Water Res 71:274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.002
Litter MI (2015) Mechanisms of removal of heavy metals and arsenic from water by TiO2-heterogeneous photocatalysis. Pure Appl Chem 87:557–567. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-0710
Lo S-I, Chen P-C, Huang C-C, Chang H-T (2012) Gold nanoparticle–aluminum oxide adsorbent for efficient removal of mercury species from natural waters. Environ Sci Technol 46:2724–2730. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203678v
Lunge S, Singh S, Sinha A (2014) Magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles from tea waste for arsenic removal. J Magn Magn Mater 356:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.12.008
Matranga V, Corsi I (2012) Toxic effects of engineered nanoparticles in the marine environment: model organisms and molecular approaches. Mar Environ Res 76:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.01.006
Mayo JT, Yavuz C, Yean S et al (2007) The effect of nanocrystalline magnetite size on arsenic removal. Sci Technol Adv Mater 8:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2006.10.005
Mitchell K, Couture R-M, Johnson TM et al (2013) Selenium sorption and isotope fractionation: iron(III) oxides versus iron(II) sulfides. Chem Geol 342:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.01.017
Nishad PA, Bhaskarapillai A, Velmurugan S (2014) Nano-titania-crosslinked chitosan composite as a superior sorbent for antimony (III) and (V). Carbohydr Polym 108:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.091
Olegario JT, Yee N, Miller M et al (2010) Reduction of Se(VI) to Se(-II) by zerovalent iron nanoparticle suspensions. J Nanoparticle Res 12:2057–2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9764-1
Pan B, Xing B (2012) Applications and implications of manufactured nanoparticles in soils: a review. Eur J Soil Sci 63:437–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01475.x
Park H, Myung NV, Jung H, Choi H (2009) As(V) remediation using electrochemically synthesized maghemite nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res 11:1981–1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9558-x
Phu ND, Phong PC, Chau N et al (2009) Arsenic removal from water by magnetic Fe1−xCoxFe2O4 and Fe1−yNiyFe2O4 nanoparticles. J Exp Nanosci 4:253–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080802590474
Pinakidou F, Katsikini M, Simeonidis K et al (2015) An X-ray absorption study of synthesis- and As adsorption-induced microstructural modifications in Fe oxy-hydroxides. J Hazard Mater 298:203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.037
Pinakidou F, Kaprara E, Katsikini M et al (2016a) Sn(II) oxy-hydroxides as potential adsorbents for Cr(VI)-uptake from drinking water: an X-ray absorption study. Sci Total Environ 551–552:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.208
Pinakidou F, Katsikini M, Paloura EC et al (2016b) Monitoring the role of Mn and Fe in the As-removal efficiency of tetravalent manganese feroxyhyte nanoparticles from drinking water: an X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. J Colloid Interface Sci 477:148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.041
Pinakidou F, Katsikini M, Simeonidis K et al (2016c) On the passivation mechanism of Fe3O4 nanoparticles during Cr(VI) removal from water: a XAFS study. Appl Surf Sci 360:1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.063
Ray PZ, Shipley HJ (2015) Inorganic nano-adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals and arsenic: a review. RSC Adv 5:29885–29907. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA02714D
Rivera-Gil P, Jimenez De Aberasturi D, Wulf V et al (2013) The challenge to relate the physicochemical properties of colloidal nanoparticles to their cytotoxicity. Acc Chem Res 46:743–749. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar300039j
Sánchez A, Recillas S, Font X et al (2011) Ecotoxicity of, and remediation with, engineered inorganic nanoparticles in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2010.11.011
Santhosh C, Velmurugan V, Jacob G et al (2016) Role of nanomaterials in water treatment applications: a review. Chem Eng J 306:1116–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.053
Shan C, Ma Z, Tong M (2014) Efficient removal of trace antimony(III) through adsorption by hematite modified magnetic nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 268:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.020
Sheela T, Nayaka YA, Viswanatha R et al (2012) Kinetics and thermodynamics studies on the adsorption of Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) from aqueous solution using zinc oxide nanoparticles. Powder Technol 217:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.023
Shipley HJ, Engates KE, Grover VA (2013) Removal of Pb(II), Cd(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) by hematite nanoparticles: effect of sorbent concentration, pH, temperature, and exhaustion. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0984-z
Siddiqi KS, Husen A (2017) Plant response to engineered metal oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-1861-y
Simeonidis K, Tziomaki M, Angelakeris M et al (2013) Development of iron-based nanoparticles for Cr(VI) removal from drinking water. EPJ Web Conf 40:08007. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20134008007
Simeonidis K, Kaprara E, Samaras T et al (2015) Optimizing magnetic nanoparticles for drinking water technology: the case of Cr(VI). Sci Total Environ 535:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.033
Simeonidis K, Mourdikoudis S, Kaprara E et al (2016) Inorganic engineered nanoparticles in drinking water treatment: a critical review. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 2:43–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EW00152H
Simeonidis K, Martinez-Boubeta C, Rivera-Gil P et al (2017a) Regeneration of arsenic spent adsorbents by Fe/MgO nanoparticles. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5187
Simeonidis K, Papadopoulou V, Tresintsi S et al (2017b) Efficiency of iron-based oxy-hydroxides in removing antimony from groundwater to levels below the drinking water regulation limits. Sustain 9:238. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU9020238
Simeonidis K, Martinez-Boubeta C, Zamora-Perez P et al (2018) Nanoparticles for heavy metal removal from drinking water. Springer, Cham, pp 75–124
Srivastava V, Weng CH, Singh VK, Sharma YC (2011) Adsorption of nickel ions from aqueous solutions by nano alumina: kinetic, mass transfer, and equilibrium studies. J Chem Eng Data 56:1414–1422. https://doi.org/10.1021/je101152b
Stancl HO, Hristovski K, Westerhoff P (2015) Hexavalent chromium removal using UV-TiO2/ceramic membrane reactor. Environ Eng Sci 32:676–683. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2014.0507
Sun H, Zhang X, Niu Q et al (2007) Enhanced accumulation of arsenate in carp in the presence of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Water Air Soil Pollut 178:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9194-y
Sun W, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2012) Exceptional arsenic adsorption performance of hydrous cerium oxide nanoparticles: part B. Integration with silica monoliths and dynamic treatment. Chem Eng J 185–186:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.060
Sun X, Yan Y, Li J et al (2014) SBA-15-incorporated nanoscale zero-valent iron particles for chromium(VI) removal from groundwater: mechanism, effect of pH, humic acid and sustained reactivity. J Hazard Mater 266:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.001
Tang SCN, Lo IMC (2013) Magnetic nanoparticles: essential factors for sustainable environmental applications. Water Res 47:2613–2632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.039
Tang W, Su Y, Li Q et al (2013) Superparamagnetic magnesium ferrite nanoadsorbent for effective arsenic (III, V) removal and easy magnetic separation. Water Res 47:3624–3634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.023
Tourinho PS, van Gestel CAM, Lofts S et al (2012) Metal-based nanoparticles in soil: fate, behavior, and effects on soil invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1679–1692. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.1880
Tresintsi S, Simeonidis K, Vourlias G et al (2012) Kilogram-scale synthesis of iron oxy-hydroxides with improved arsenic removal capacity: study of Fe(II) oxidation–precipitation parameters. Water Res 46:5255–5267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.049
Tresintsi S, Simeonidis K, Estradé S et al (2013) Tetravalent manganese feroxyhyte: a novel nanoadsorbent equally selective for As(III) and As(V) removal from drinking water. Environ Sci Technol 47:9699–9705. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4009932
Tresintsi S, Simeonidis K, Mitrakas M (2014) Mn-feroxyhyte: the role of synthesis conditions on As(III) and As(V) removal capacity. Chem Eng J 251:192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.033
Tu Y-J, You C-F, Chang C-K et al (2014) XANES evidence of molybdenum adsorption onto novel fabricated nano-magnetic CuFe2O4. Chem Eng J 244:343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.084
Tu Y-J, Chan T-S, Tu H-W et al (2016) Rapid and efficient removal/recovery of molybdenum onto ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles. Chemosphere 148:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.054
U.S. EPA (1986) Test methods for evaluating solid wastes, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), Method 1311 SW-846, 3rd edn. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Wang Z, Zhang L, Zhao J, Xing B (2016) Environmental processes and toxicity of metallic nanoparticles in aquatic systems as affected by natural organic matter. Environ Sci Nano 3:240–255. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EN00230C
Westerhoff P, Alvarez P, Li Q et al (2016) Overcoming implementation barriers for nanotechnology in drinking water treatment. Environ Sci Nano 3:1241–1253. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EN00183A
Xu W, Wang J, Wang L et al (2013) Enhanced arsenic removal from water by hierarchically porous CeO2–ZrO2 nanospheres: role of surface- and structure-dependent properties. J Hazard Mater 260:498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.010
Yavuz CT, Mayo JT, Yu WW et al (2006) Low-field magnetic separation of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanocrystals. Science 314:964–967. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131475
Yu L, Peng X, Ni F et al (2013) Arsenite removal from aqueous solutions by α-Fe2O3–TiO2 magnetic nanoparticles through simultaneous photocatalytic oxidation and adsorption. J Hazard Mater 246–247:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.12.007
Zhang P, Ma Y, Zhang Z et al (2012) Biotransformation of ceria nanoparticles in cucumber plants. ACS Nano 6:9943–9950. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn303543n
Zhu H, Jia Y, Wu X, Wang H (2009) Removal of arsenic from water by supported nano zero-valent iron on activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 172:1591–1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.031
Acknowledgements
This scientific work was implemented within the frame of the action “Supporting Postdoctoral Researchers” of the Operational Program “Development of Human Resources, Education and Lifelong Learning 2014–2020” of IKY State Scholarships Foundation and is co-financed by the European Social Fund and the Greek State. P.Z.P. acknowledges projects BES-2015-075020 and MDM-2014-0370-04, and P.R.G. projects RYC-2012-10059, AEI-SAF2015-73052-EXP, MAT2016-75362-C3-2-R(AEI/FEDER/UE) and MDM-2014-0370-04, all funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness (MINECO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simeonidis, K., Martinez-Boubeta, C., Zamora-Pérez, P. et al. Implementing nanoparticles for competitive drinking water purification. Environ Chem Lett 17, 705–719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-00821-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-00821-5