Skip to main content

Nature of an Engineered System: Illustrated from Engineering Artefacts and Complex Systems

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbook of Systems Sciences
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

An engineered system is a system deliberately designed or adapted to interact with the operational environment to achieve an intended purpose while complying with applicable constraints. This chapter describes the nature of engineered systems illustrated with examples ranging from engineered artifacts to complex systems of systems. It makes clear the distinction between physical and conceptual systems and the importance of both in the Systems Engineering required to conceive, realize, deploy, operate, and retire effective engineered systems. It pays particular attention to the issues involved in integration of “hard” and “soft” aspects of engineered systems to create effective and beneficial socio-technical systems, with the goal of providing maximum value while avoiding or minimizing harm and other unintended negative consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adelman S (2017) Geoengineering: rights, risks and ethics. J Human Rights Environ 8:119, Edward Elgar Publishing

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TFH, Starr TB (2017) Hierarchy – perspectives for ecological complexity, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arp R, Smith B, Spear AD (2015) Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bahill AT (2012) Diogenes, a process for identifying unintended consequences. Syst Eng 15(3):287. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahill AT, Szidarovszky F, Botta R, Smith ED (2008) Valid models require defined levels. Int J Gen Syst 37(5):553–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyus JM (2002) Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow paperbacks, pp 254–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy L v (1969) General systems theory. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockley D, Godfrey P (2017) Doing it differently: systems for rethinking infrastructure, 2nd edn. ICE Publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broy M, Cengarle MV, Geisberger E (2012) Cyber-physical systems: imminent challenges. In: Calinescu R, Garlan D (eds) Proceedings of the 17th Monterey workshop, “Large scale complex IT systems – development, operation and management”, Revised selected papers, Oxford, UK, March 2012. Springer, Alemania

    Google Scholar 

  • Bungay S (2001) The most dangerous enemy: a history of the battle of Britain. Aurum Press, London, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert SC, Wageningen-Kessels FLM, Hoogendoorn SP (2018) Capacity drop through reaction times in heterogeneous traffic. J Traffic Transp Eng (Engl Ed) 5(2):96–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter K, Mukhtar A (2008) Partnering heathrow terminal 5. In: Carter K, Kaka A, Ogunlana S (eds) Proceedings of joint international CIB symposium, Dubai, pp 178–179. Longer version at https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB17591.pdf

  • Chaisson E (1994) The Hubble Wars – astrophysics meets astropolitics in the two-billion-dollar struggle over the Hubble Space Telescope. Harper-Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler D (2014) Beyond neoliberalism: resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience 2(1):47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.878544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff D, Northrop L (2012) The global financial markets – an ultra large scale system perspective. In: Calinescu R, Garlan D (eds) Proceedings of the 17th Monterey workshop, “Large scale complex IT systems – development, operation and management”, revised selected papers, Oxford, UK, March 2012. Springer, Alemania

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley E, Cameron B, Selva D (2015) System architecture: strategy and product development for complex systems. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen P (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Change 77:211–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra E (1972) The humble programmer, ACM turing award lecture. Commun ACM 15:859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoD (2010) The DoDAF architecture framework version 2.02, https://dodcio.defense.gov/Library/DoD-Architecture-Framework/, DoD Deputy Chief Information Officer, September 2010

  • Dori D, Sillitto H (2017) What is a system? An ontological framework. Syst Eng 20(3):207, Wiley

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle J, Moran C, Ward-Perkins Z (2017) The econocracy – the perils of leaving economics to the experts. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen Macarthur Foundation (2017). https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy. Accessed 19 July 2018

  • Ellinas C, Allan N, Durugbo C, Johansson A (2015) How robust is your project? From local failures to global catastrophes: a complex networks approach to project systemic risk. PLoS One 10(11):1–21. [e0142469]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142469

  • European Environmental Agency (2016) Protecting, conserving and enhancing natural capital, chapter 3 of SOER 2015 – The European environment – state and outlook 2015 – a comprehensive assessment of the European environment’s state, trends and prospects, in a global context. European Environmental Agency Web Team, 14 Jan 2016. https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer

  • Hall AD III (1989) Metasystems methodology; a new synthesis and unification. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AD, Fagen RE (1956) Definition of system. In: General systems, vol 1l, pp 18–28; Republished in: Buckley W (2008) Systems research for behavioral science: a sourcebook, pp 81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J, Bartlett M (2014) Case study 2 – Heathrow terminal 5 – a new paradigm for major project risk management. Institute of Risk Management. https://www.theirm.org/media/1055871/case_study2.pdf

  • Hitchins D (2007) Systems engineering: a 21st century systems methodology. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hybertson DW (2009) Model-oriented systems engineering science: a unifying framework for traditional and complex systems. Auerbach Publications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • INCOSE (2014) INCOSE SE vision 2025 – a world in motion. International Council On Systems Engineering, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • INCOSE (2015) A complexity primer for systems engineers. International Council On Systems Engineering, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC/IEEE (2015) Systems and software engineering – System life cycle processes ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S (2015) Systems engineering for commercial aircraft, 2nd edn. Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey & Burlington, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Joss S (2011) Eco-cities: the mainstreaming of urban sustainability – key characteristics and driving factors. Int J Sustain Dev Plann 6(3):268–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joss S, Tomozeiu D, Cowley R (2011) Eco-cities – a global survey 2011. University of Westminster, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaitan SK, McCalley JD (2015) Design techniques and applications of cyberphysical systems: a survey. IEEE Syst J 9:350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H (2010) A journey through the systems landscape. College Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Put A (2016) Systems product line engineering handbook. AFIS, Orsay 91893 Paris cedex

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier MW (1998) Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Syst Eng 1(4):267–284, Wiley

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud B (2003) Tails of natural hazards. Phys World 17:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J (2004) The seven Samurai of systems engineering: dealing with the complexity of 7 interrelated systems. INCOSE international symposium, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermid J (2012) The risks of LSCITS: the odds are stacked against us. In: Calinescu R, Garlan D (eds) Proceedings of the 17th Monterey workshop, “Large scale complex IT systems – development, operation and management”, revised selected papers, Oxford, UK, March 2012. Springer, Alemania

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute (2011) Urban world: mapping the economic power of cities. McKinsey, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton RK (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. Am Sociol Rev 1(6):894–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najibi N, Devineni N (2017) Recent trends in frequency and duration of global floods. Earth Syst Dyn 9:757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman D (1998) The design of everyday things. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrop L et al (2006) In: Pollack B (ed) Ultra-large-scale systems: the software challenge of the future. SEI, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzuto I (2013) Predictable and avoidable: repairing economic dislocation and preventing the recurrence of crisis. Gower, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechtin E (1991) Systems architecting – creating and building complex systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechtin E, Maier MW (2009) The art of systems architecting, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen R (1971) The polarity between structure and function. Paper presented at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Nov 22, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen R (1985, 2012) Anticipatory systems: philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations, 1st edn, 1985; 2nd edn, with contributions by Judith Rosen, John J. Kineman and Mihai Nadin, 2012, lx + 472 pp. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg G, Carhart N, Edkins AJ, Ward J (2014) Development of a proposed interdependency planning and management framework, final report, International Centre for Infrastructure Futures, 30th October 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugg G (2013) System optimisation and subsystem optimisation, Hyde and Rugg blog. https://hydeandrugg.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/subsystem-optimisation-and-system-optimisation/

  • Russell AL (2013) OSI: the Internet that wasn’t – how TCP/IP eclipsed the Open Systems Interconnection standards to become the global protocol for computer networking. IEEE Spectrum, 30 July 2013. https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-history/cyberspace/osi-the-internet-that-wasnt

  • Schumacher M, Fernandez E, Hybertson D, Buschmann F (2005) Security patterns: integrating security and systems engineering. Wiley Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto HG (2005) Some really useful principles – some really useful principles: a new look at the scope and boundaries of systems engineering. INCOSE international symposium, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto HG (2010) Design principles for ultra-large scale systems. INCOSE international symposium, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto HG (2014) Architecting systems: concepts, principles and practice. College Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto HG, Dori D, Griego RM, Jackson S, Krob D, Godfrey P, Arnold E, Martin J, McKinney D (2017) Defining “System” – a comprehensive approach. INCOSE international symposium, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto HG, Dori D, Griego RM, Jackson S, Krob D, Godfrey P, Arnold E, Martin J, McKinney D (2018a) A fresh look at systems engineering – what is it, how should it work? INCOSE international symposium, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto HG, Dori D, Griego RM, Jackson S, Krob D, Godfrey P, Arnold E, Martin J, McKinney D (2018b) Envisioning systems engineering as a transdisciplinary venture. INCOSE international symposium, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto HG, Dori D, Griego RM, Jackson S, Krob D, Godfrey P, Arnold E, Martin J, McKinney D (2018c) What do we mean by “system”? – System Beliefs and Worldviews in the INCOSE Community. INCOSE International Symposium, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville C, Calinescu K, Kelly K, McDermid J, Paige R (2012) Large scale complex IT systems. Commun ACM 55(7):71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 348(6240):12–17. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum AS (1996) Computer networks, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Törngren M, Sellgren U (2018) Complexity challenges in development of cyber-physical systems. In: Lohstroh M, Derler P, Sirjani M (eds) Principles of modeling. lecture notes in computer science, vol 10760. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk T (2017) Quarks to culture – how we came to be. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson CS (2011) System phases, modes, and states: solutions to controversial issues. INCOSE international symposium, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver W (1948) Science and complexity. Am Scientist 36(4):536–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock M (ed) (2013) System city: infrastructure and the space of flows. Architectural design, vol 04/2013. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymore W (1998) Subsystem optimization implies system suboptimization: not! http://sysengr.engr.arizona.edu/wymore/optimal.html

  • Zachman JA (2000) Conceptual, logical, physical: it is simple. Zachman International, Co

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hillary Sillitto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sillitto, H. (2021). Nature of an Engineered System: Illustrated from Engineering Artefacts and Complex Systems. In: Metcalf, G.S., Kijima, K., Deguchi, H. (eds) Handbook of Systems Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0370-8_17-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0370-8_17-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0370-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0370-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Nature of an Engineered System: Illustrated from Engineering Artefacts and Complex Systems
    Published:
    11 November 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0370-8_17-2

  2. Original

    Nature of an Engineered Systems: Illustrated from Engineering Artefacts and Complex Systems
    Published:
    02 September 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0370-8_17-1