Skip to main content

The UN Human Rights Committee

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
International Human Rights Institutions, Tribunals, and Courts

Part of the book series: International Human Rights ((IHR))

  • 225 Accesses

Abstract

The UN Human Rights Committee, which is recognized for its legal expertise in human rights law, belongs to the most prominent institutions for the oversight of international human rights. The Committee was the first universal body with a mandate to examine individual communications. Among the international treaty bodies it continues to receive the highest number of individual petitions. Through the course of its four decades of existence, the Committee has developed a considerable body of jurisprudence affecting the interpretation of human rights by domestic and international institutions, including the International Court of Justice. The present chapter introduces readers to the work of this quasi-judicial expert body from the perspective of a former Committee member. It locates the Committee’s institutional place in the overall structure of the human rights system and describes current challenges and developments. The author offers an in-depth assessment of the Committee’s legacy and makes proposals on how the Committee can refine its procedures and methodology.

The author was a member of the Human Rights Committee from 2013 to 2018. The views expressed in this chapter are solely those of the author and do not claim to represent the position of the Committee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ando N (2007) The development of the Human Rights Committee’s procedure to consider the States Parties’ reports under Article 40 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In: Kohen MG (ed) Promoting justice, human rights and conflict resolution through international law/La promotion de la justice, des droits de l’homme et du réglement des conflits par le droit international: Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflisch. Brill, Leiden, pp 17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Buergenthal T (2001) The U.N. Human Rights Committee. Max Planck Yearb U N Law 5:341–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford J (2000) The UN human rights treaty system: a system in crisis? In: Alston P, Crawford J (eds) The future of UN-human rights treaty monitoring. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Davala M (2012) Conflict of interest in universal human rights bodies. In: Peters A, Handschin L (eds) Conflict of interest in global, public and corporate overnance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • David V (2014) Reparations at the Human Rights Committee. Neth Q Hum Rights 32:8–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Zayas A (2001) The examination of individual complaints by the United Nations Human Rights Committee under the optional protocol to the international covenant on civil and political rights. In: Alfredsson G et al (eds) International human rights monitoring mechanisms. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, pp 67–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox Principi K (2018) United Nations individual complaint procedures – how do states comply? A categorized study based on 268 cases of “satisfactory” implementation under the follow-up procedure, mainly of the UN Human Rights Committee. Hum Rights Law J, 37:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakki MM (2002) The silver anniversary of the Human Rights Committee: anything to celebrate? Int J Hum Rights 6(3):85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway OA (2002) Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law J 11(8):1935–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HRC. Grille Motta v Uruguay. Communication No. 11/1977 (29 July 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • HRC. Bleier v Uruguay. Communication No. 30/1978 (29 March 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • HRC. General Comment No. 26: general comment on issues relating to the continuity of obligations to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (8 December 1997) UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.8/Rev.1

    Google Scholar 

  • HRC. Piandiong et al v. The Philippines. Communication No. 869/1999 (15 June 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • HRC. General Comment No. 31: the nature of the general legal obligation imposed on States Parties to the Covenant (29 March 2004) UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13

    Google Scholar 

  • HRC. General Comment No. 33: the obligations of States Parties under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (5 November 2008) UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/33

    Google Scholar 

  • HRC. The relationship of the Human Rights Committee with non-governmental organizations (4 June 2012) 104th Session, UN Doc CCPR/C/104/3

    Google Scholar 

  • HRC. Working methods of the Human Rights Committee. Available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CCPR/Pages/WorkingMethods.aspx. Accessed 28 Nov 2017

  • HRC (1994) Procedural Decisions of the Human Rights Committee, UN Doc A/48/49, Annex VII (1994). (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Yugoslavia)

    Google Scholar 

  • ILA (2004) International human rights law and practice: final report on the impact of findings of the United Nations human rights treaty bodies. In: Report of the seventy-first conference held in Berlin (16–21 August 2004). International Law Association, London, pp 621–702

    Google Scholar 

  • ILC. Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1997, Volume II, Part Two, UN Doc A/52/10

    Google Scholar 

  • International Court of Justice. Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations (Advisory Opinion) (1989) ICJ Rep 177

    Google Scholar 

  • International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Prosecutor v Anto Furundzija (Judgment in the Trial Chamber) Case No. IT-95-17/1-T (10 December 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v Democratic Republic of the Congo) (Judgment) (2010) ICJ Rep 639

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171 (ICCPR)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller H, Grover L (2012) General comments of the Human Rights Committee and their legitimacy. In: Keller H, Ulfstein G (eds) Human rights treaty bodies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Killander M (2014) Jurisprudential dialogue in supranational human rights litigation in Africa. In: Reinisch A et al (eds) International law and… select proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Volume 5. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein E (2011) Stimmen Zweck und Mittel des internationalen Menschenrechtsschutzes überein? In: Wittinger M et al (eds) Verfassung – Völkerrecht – Kulturgüterschutz. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 541–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein E, Kretzmer D (2015) The UN Human Rights Committee: the general comments – the evolution of an autonomous monitoring instrument. Ger Yearb Int Law 58:189–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma J, Nowak M, Scheinin M (2010) A world court of human rights: consolidated statute and commentary. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Wien/Graz

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmer D (2000) Commentary on complaint processes by Human Rights Committee and Torture Committee Members: the Human Rights Committee. In: Bayefsky A (ed) The UN human rights treaty system in the 21st century. Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London/Boston, pp 163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmer D, Klein E (2015) The UN Human Rights Committee: monitoring states parties reports. Isr Yearb Hum Rights 45:133–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintel I, Rygaert C (2013) The interface between non-governmental organisations and the Human Rights Committee. Int Community Law Rev 15:359–379. https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick D (1994) The Human Rights Committee: its role in the development of the international covenant on civil and political rights. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechlem K (2009) Treaty bodies and the interpretation of human rights. Vanderbilt J Transl Law 42:905–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutzenberg P (2014) Agir pour la mise en oeuvre des droits civils et politiques: L’apport du Comité des droits de l’homme. Editions L’Harmattan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Navanethem P (2012) Strengthening the United Nations human rights system: a report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Available at http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/HRTD/docs/HCReportTBStrengthening.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2017

  • Neuman GL (2018) Giving meaning and effect to human rights: the contributions of Human Rights Committee Members. In: Moeckli D, Keller H (eds) The UN Human Rights Covenants at 50. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M (2005) U.N. Covenant on civil and political rights: CCPR commentary. N.P. Engel Verlag, Kehl

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M (2013) Comments on the High Commissioner’s proposals aimed at strengthening the UN human rights treaty body system. Neth Q Hum Rights 31:133–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171 (Optional Protocol to the ICCPR)

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel E (2013) Global human rights at the crossroads: strengthening or reforming the system. In: Breuer M et al (eds) Der Staat im Recht. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 1289–1306

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieter E (2010) Preventing irreparable harm: provisional measures in international human rights adjudication. Intersentia, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodley N (2013) The role and impact of treaty bodies. In: Shelton D (ed) The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 621–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MG (2011) Follow-up procedures to individual complaints and periodic state reporting mechanisms. In: Alfredsson G et al (eds) International human rights monitoring mechanisms. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, pp 201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert-Fohr A (2004) The potentials of the Vienna convention on the law of treaties with respect to reservations to human rights treaties. In: Ziemele I (ed) Reservations to human rights treaties and the Vienna convention regime: conflict, harmony or reconciliation. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, pp 183–211

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert-Fohr A (2012) The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: moving from coexistence to cooperation and solidarity. In: Hestermeyer H et al (eds) Coexistence, cooperation and solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston, pp 521–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert-Fohr A (2014) Judicial engagment in international human rights comparativism. In: Reinisch A et al (eds) International law and…select proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Volume 5. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp 7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Shany Y (2013) The effectiveness of the Human Rights Committee and the treaty body reform. In: Breuer M et al (eds) Der Staat im Recht. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 1307–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • Shikhelman V (2015) Impartiality, geopolitics and culture in the United Nations Human Rights Committee. Available via SSRN. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2616026. Accessed 28 Nov 2017

  • Shikhelman V (2017) Access to justice in the United Nations Human Rights Committee. Mich J Int Law 3. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2999668. Accessed 28 Nov 2017

  • Simma B (2013) Human rights before the international court of justice: community interest coming to life? In: Tams CJ, Sloan J (eds) The development of international law by the international court of justice. Oxford University Publisher, Oxford, pp 577–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons BA (2011) Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tistounet E (2000) The problem of overlapping among different treaty bodies. In: Alston P, Crawford J (eds) The future of UN-human rights treaty monitoring. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 383–401

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tomuschat C (1995) Making individual communications an effective tool for the protection of human rights. In: Beyerlin U et al (eds) Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 615–634

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tomuschat C (2010) Human Rights Committee. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Available via at http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e813?prd=EPIL. Accessed 28 Nov 2017

  • Tyagi Y (2011) The UN Human Rights Committee. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Economic and Social Council. Comments of Governments on the Draft International Covenant on human rights and measures of implementation, (29 December 1949) UN Doc E/CN.4/353

    Google Scholar 

  • UN International Human Rights Instruments. Compilation of general comments and general recommendations adopted by human rights treaty bodies (29 March 1996) General Comment No. 24: General comment on issues relating to reservations made upon ratification or accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols thereto, or in relation to declarations under article 41 of the Covenant, UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev.2

    Google Scholar 

  • UN International Human Rights Instruments. Harmonized guidelines on reporting under the international human rights treaties, including guidelines on a common core document and treaty specific documents (10 May 2006) UN Doc HRI/MC/2006/3

    Google Scholar 

  • UN International Human Rights Instruments. Twenty-seventh meeting of chairpersons of the human rights treaty bodies: guidelines against Intimidation or Reprisals (“San José Guidelines”) (30 July 2015) UN Doc HRI/MC/2015/6

    Google Scholar 

  • UN International Human Rights Instruments. Compliance by States parties with their reporting obligations to international human rights treaty bodies: Note by the Secretariat, (2 May 2017) 29th Meeting of Chairs, Item 8 of the provisional agenda, UN Doc HRI/MC/2017/2

    Google Scholar 

  • UN International Human Rights Instruments. Twenty-ninth meeting of Chairs of the human rights treaty bodies: compliance by State parties with their reporting obligations to international human rights treaty bodies (2 May 2017) UN Doc HRI/MC/2017/2

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCHR. Focused reports based on replied to lists of issues prior to reporting (LOIPR): implementation of the new optional reporting procedure (LOIPR procedure), (29 September 2010) 99th Session, UN Doc CCPR/C/99/4

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCHR. Rules of procedure of the Human Rights Committee (11 January 2012) UN Doc CCPR/C/3/Rev.10

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCHR. Statistical survey of individual complaints dealt with by the Human Rights Committee under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (March 2016). Available at http://www.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/Documents/HRBodies/CCPR/StatisticalSurvey.xls&action=default&DefaultItemOpen=1. Accessed 28 Nov 2017

  • UNGA. Draft First International Covenant on Human Rights and measures of implementation (1 December 1950), GAOR (V), Agenda item 63, UN Doc A/1576

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Draft First International Covenant on Human Rights: report of the third committee (20 November 1950) GAOR (V), Agenda item 63, UN Doc A/1559

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Draft International Covenants on Human Rights: report of the third committee (10 December 1963) GAOR (XVIII), Agenda item 48, UN Doc A/5655

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Draft International Covenants on Human Rights: report of the third committee (13 December 1966) GAOR (XXI), Agenda item 62, UN Doc A/6546

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its forty-eighth session Volume I (21 September–23 December 1993) GAOR (XLVIII), UN Doc A/48/49

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Resolution 56/272: comprehensive study of the question of honorariums payable to members of organs and subsidiary organs of the United Nations (23 April 2002) GAOR (LVI), Agenda item 122, UN Doc A/Res/56/272

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Resolution 60/149: International Covenants on Human Rights (16 December 2005) Agenda item 71 (a), UN Doc A/Res/60/149

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Implementation of human rights instruments. Note by the Secretary General (2 August 2012) GAOR (LXVII), Agenda item 70 (a) of the provisional agenda, UN Doc A/67/222

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. United Nations reform: measures and proposals. Note by the Secretary General (26 June 2012) GAOR (LXVI), Agenda item 124, UN Doc A/66/860

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Resolution 68/268: strengthening and enhancing the effective functioning of the human rights treaty body system (9 April 2014) GAOR (LXVIII), Agenda item 125, UN Doc A/Res/68/268

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Status of the human rights treaty body system: Report of the Secretary-General (18 July 2016) GAOR (LXXI), Items 69 (a) and 124 of the provisional agenda, UN Doc A/71/118

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Report of the Human Rights Committee: 117th – 119th session (2017) GAOR ( LXXII), UN Doc A/72/40

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (3–21 July 2017) GAOR (L), UN Doc A/72/17

    Google Scholar 

  • Young KA (2002) The law and process of the U.N. Human Rights Committee. Transnational Publishers, Ardsley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Seibert-Fohr, A. (2018). The UN Human Rights Committee. In: Oberleitner, G. (eds) International Human Rights Institutions, Tribunals, and Courts. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4516-5_6-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4516-5_6-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4516-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4516-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    The UN Human Rights Committee
    Published:
    20 June 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4516-5_6-2

  2. Original

    The UN Human Rights Committee
    Published:
    21 March 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4516-5_6-1