Skip to main content

The Protection of Children in Armed Conflicts

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
International Human Rights of Children

Part of the book series: International Human Rights ((IHR))

  • 189 Accesses

Abstract

Today, with around 250 million children living in situations of armed conflict, protecting children in conflicts is a major challenge for international children’s law and its implementation. This chapter examines the international legal provisions that protect children during armed conflict found in two separate but complementary legal regimes: international human rights law and international humanitarian law. It reviews the general legal protections given to children during conflict, notably their access to supplies vital for their physical and mental well-being (such as medical care, food, and clothing) and their access to activities essential for their development, particularly education. It also examines how international law protects children from participating in armed conflicts: it analyzes the prohibition of their recruitment and use in hostilities and also reviews how children arrested or detained must be treated. The chapter concludes with a brief overview of how the protection of children in armed conflict has become a major international issue over the last decades, notably within the UN system.

The views expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, the United Nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some 17 million were displaced by violence and conflict within their own countries (UNICEF 2016c: 7, 18). This chapter does not deal with displacement and refugees issues as they are substantially covered elsewhere in this publication.

  2. 2.

    In its previous decisions, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) stated that protections offered by human rights conventions do not cease in times of war, except by operation of the Article 4 provisions on derogations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICJ 1996: 239–240 paras. 24–25, 2004: 178 para. 106). The applicability of IHRL in situations in armed conflicts was also confirmed by the ICJ in the Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (ICJ 2005: 239–245 paras. 205–221). However, no derogations are allowed under IHL, except for a few exceptions (The Fourth Geneva Convention (1949), Article 5). See also Heintze (2004); Murray (2016: 82 para. 4.09).

  3. 3.

    Some are of the view that, during armed conflicts, international humanitarian law is the applicable lex specialis, displacing international human rights law. However, a more generally held view is that international human rights law continues to apply during armed conflict, subject to applicable derogations: see footnote 2

  4. 4.

    See also footnote 2.

  5. 5.

    International armed conflicts are conflicts that involve at least two States (ICRC 2003: p. 1). They are subject to a wide range of rules, including those set out in the four Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I. While the precise definition of a non-international armed conflict is debated; the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia provides this definition, qualifying it as “protracted armed violence between governmental authorities and organized armed groups or between such groups within a State” (ICTY 1995: para. 70). A more limited range of rules apply to internal armed conflicts and are laid down in Article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions as well as in Additional Protocol II (ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, p. 1).

  6. 6.

    Like IHRL, IHL generally prohibits the imposition of the death penalty on children who were under 18 years of age at the time of the offence (Geneva Convention IV Article 68; AP II Article 6(4)). Additional Protocol I prohibits the execution of the death penalty for an offense related to the armed conflict on persons who had not attained the age of 18 at the time of the offense (AP I: Art. 77(5)).

  7. 7.

    For example, the explicit requirements of Article 37(b) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child that require States to detain children only as a last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time are not contained in IHL

  8. 8.

    Pejic (2005: 377): “Even though internment in international armed conflicts is regulated by the Fourth Geneva Convention and Additional Protocol I, these treaties do not sufficiently elaborate on the procedural rights of internees, nor do they specify the details of the legal framework that a detaining authority must implement. In non-international armed conflicts there is even less clarity as to how administrative detention is to be organized.”

  9. 9.

    See also Henckaerts and Doswald-Beck ICRC (2005): Rule 120: “Children who are deprived of their liberty must be held in quarters separate from those of adults, except where families are accommodated as family units.”

  10. 10.

    Protections during non-international armed conflicts are usually less elaborated than those applicable during international armed conflicts because States have unusually been more reluctant to develop an international legal framework which could curb their capacity to deal with what they perceive to be internal matters (Sassòli et al. 2011: Part I, Chapter 12, p. 1).

  11. 11.

    The right to education, enshrined in Art. 26(1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is also found in key international human rights treaties, including Art. 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and in Article 28 of the CRC. The Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols also contain several provisions protecting children’s right to education during armed conflict, including for certain particularly vulnerable children, namely, those orphaned or separated from their families (Art. 94 GCIV), interned children and young people (Art. 78(2) AP), and evacuated children (Art. 78(2) AP I). These IHL treaties also provide for an occupying power’s obligation to facilitate the proper functioning of educational institutions during military occupation (Art. 78(2) AP I). Education is also guaranteed during non-international armed conflicts, as parties must ensure that children receive the care and aid they require, including education (Art. 4(3) (a) AP II).

  12. 12.

    Article 56 of the Hague Regulations of 1899 and 1907 also prohibits “all seizure of, and destruction, or intentional damage done to” certain institutions including those dedicated to education.

  13. 13.

    AP I is exclusively applicable in situations of international armed conflicts, which are characterized by an armed conflict between two and more States Parties or by a situation of occupation (Common Art. 2 GC) or by an armed conflict in which peoples are fighting against colonial domination, alien occupation, or racist regimes in the exercise of their right of self-determination (Article 1(4) AP I).

  14. 14.

    Since 1998, Child Soldiers International (formerly known as the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers), a coalition that includes both human rights and humanitarian organizations, has been working to establish 18 as the minimum age for military recruitment in all countries worldwide as a part of their “Straight 18” campaign (Becker 2014: 598; Child Soldiers International). The Special Representative for the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict launched a “Zero Under Eighteen” campaign in 2012 to promote universal ratification of OPAC (Coomaraswamy 2010).

  15. 15.

    See Aptel (2014). In 2007, SCSL convicted former leaders of the Sierra Leonean Armed Forces Revolutionary Council and a leader of the Civil Defense Forces for conscripting children under 15 into armed groups and forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities (the conviction of the Civil Defense Forces’ leader was later overturned on appeal) (Judgment, Brima, Kamara, and Kanu (AFRC) (SCSL-04–16-T), Trial Chamber II (June 20, 2007); Judgment, Fofana and Kondewa (CDF) (SCSL-04–14-T), Trial Chamber I (Aug. 2, 2007); Judgment, Brima, Kamara, and Kanu (AFRC) (SCSL-2004–16-A), Appeals Chamber (Feb. 22, 2008); Judgment, Fofana and Kondewa (CDF) (SCSL-04–14-A), Appeals Chamber (May 28, 2008), paras. 139–146). In 2009, two prominent Revolutionary United Front leaders were also convicted for the crime (affirmed on appeal) (Judgment, Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao (RUF) (SCSL-04–15-T), Trial Chamber I (Feb. 25, 2009), paras. 2223–2234; Judgment, Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao (RUF) (SCSL-04–15-A), Appeals Chamber (Oct. 26, 2009)). In 2012, the SCSL convicted Charles Taylor, the former Liberian president, for the same crime (affirmed on appeal) (Judgment, Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao (RUF) (SCSL-04–15-T), Trial Chamber I (Feb. 25, 2009). paras. 2223–2234; Judgment, Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao (RUF) (SCSL-04–15-A), Appeals Chamber (Oct. 26, 2009)).

  16. 16.

    The Chamber stated that the term “does not have to be given the same interpretation as the terms active or direct participation in the context of the principle of distinction between combatants and civilians, as set out, in particular, in Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions” (ICC 2014: para. 324). In the earlier decision by the Trial Chamber, the majority similarly stated that the expression “to participate actively in hostilities,” as opposed to the expression “direct participation” used in the Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, was intended to include a wide range of activities (ICC 2012a: para. 627). The Judgment stated that “those who participate actively in hostilities include a wide range of individuals, from those on the front line (who participate directly) through to the boys or girls who are involved in a myriad of roles that support the combatants” (ICC 2012a: para. 628). However, although the Trial Chamber concluded that “girls under the age of 15 were used for domestic work, in addition to the other tasks they carried out as UPC/FPLC soldiers,” it did not equal to use to participate actively in hostilities (ICC 2012a: paras 878–882, 915).

  17. 17.

    The existence of such a link, according to the Appeals Chamber, shall be made on a case-by-case basis, along with the guidance of the lists of activities set out in the ICRC commentary on the Additional Protocols and in the Preparatory Committee’s Draft Statute (ICC 2014: para 335).

  18. 18.

    “UNAMI/OHCHR has received numerous reports alleging that ISIL and some associated armed groups are actively recruiting children as young as 13 as fighters” (UNAMI and OHCHR 2014: 17–18).

  19. 19.

    The annexes were originally mandated by the Res. 1379 (2001), para. 16. The Working Group’s mandate also includes reviewing progress in the development and implementation of action plans. The mandate also includes making recommendations to the Council on possible measures to promote the protection of children affected by armed conflict and addressing requests to other bodies within the United Nations system for action to support implementation of Resolution 1612 (2005) within their respective mandates. (United Nations Security Council Subsidiary Organs, Working Group on Children in Armed Conflict https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/en/subsidiary/wgcaac. See UN Security Council 2004: para. 5(a), 2005a: paras. 7 and 8.). The Working Group comprises all 15 members of the Security Council and makes its decisions by consensus (https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/en/subsidiary/wgcaac).

References

  • Aptel C (2010a) International criminal justice and child protection. In: Parmar S, Roseman MJ, Siegrist S, Sowa T (eds) Children and transitional justice: truth-telling, accountability and reconciliation. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence/Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, pp 67–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Aptel C (2010b) Children and accountability for international crimes: the contribution of International Criminal Courts. Innocenti working paper no. 2010–20. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Aptel C (2012) Lubanga decision roundtable: the participation of children in hostilities. Opinio juris blog. Available at http://opiniojuris.org/2012/03/18/lubanga-decision-roundtable-the-participation-of-children-in-hostilities/

  • Aptel C (2014) Unpunished crimes: The Special Court for Sierra Leone and Children. In: Jalloh CC (ed) The Sierra Leone Special Court and its legacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 340–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Aptel C, Ladisch V (2011) Through a new lens: a child sensitive approach to transitional justice. International Center for Transitional Justice, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J (2014) From opponent to ally: the United States and efforts to end the use of child soldiers. Mich State Int Law Rev 22(2):596–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha J (2014) Child migration and human rights in a global age. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Child Soldiers International. Available at https://www.child-soldiers.org/our-strategy-1

  • Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 Aug 1949 (Geneva Convention IV)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomaraswamy R (2010) The optional protocol to the convention on the rights of the child on the involvement of children in armed conflict – towards universal ratification. Int J Child Rights 18(4):535–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drumbl M (2012) Reimagining child soldiers in international law and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (1996) Study on the impact of armed conflicts on the nutritional situation of children. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/w2357e/W2357E00.htm

  • Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (2017a) Safe schools declaration endorsements. Available at http://www.protectingeducation.org/guidelines/support

  • Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (2017b) Safe schools declaration. Available at http://protectingeducation.org/sites/default/files/documents/safe_schools_declaration-final.pdf

  • Hamilton C, Anderson K, Barnes R, Dorling K (2011) Discussion paper: administrative detention of children: a global report. UNICEF, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintze H-J (2004) On the relationship between human rights law protection and international humanitarian law. Int Rev Red Cross 86(856):789–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henckaerts J-M, Doswald-Beck L (ICRC) (2005) Study on customary international humanitarian law: volume I, rules. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2007) Children in the ranks: the Maoists’ use of child soldiers in Nepal. Human Rights Watch, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2016) Extreme measures: abuses against children detained as national security threats. Human Rights Watch, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson A, Waterhouse P, March-MacDonald J, Neal S, Ingham R (2016) Understanding early marriage and transactional sex in the context of armed conflict: protection at a price. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 42(1):45–44. https://doi.org/10.1363/42e0416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (2003) Legal protection of children in armed conflict. Legal factsheet. Available at https://www.icrc.org/en/document/legal-protection-children-armed-conflict-factsheet

  • International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (2007) 30th international conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, study on customary international humanitarian law, 30IC/07/8.3 Available at https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/30ic_8-3_customaryihl_report_final_eng.pdf

  • International Court of Justice (ICJ) (1996) Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons, advisory opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, pp 226–267

    Google Scholar 

  • International Court of Justice (ICJ) (2004) Legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territory, advisory opinion, I.C.J. Reports, pp 136–203

    Google Scholar 

  • International Court of Justice (ICJ) (2005) Armed activities on the territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), judgment, I.C.J. Reports, pp 168–283

    Google Scholar 

  • International Criminal Court (ICC) (2007) Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC-01/04-01/06), Pre-Trial Chamber I, Decision on the confirmation of charges

    Google Scholar 

  • International Criminal Court (ICC) (2011) Rome statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998. Available at https://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/ADD16852-AEE9-4757-ABE7-9CDC7CF02886/283503/RomeStatutEng1.pdf

  • International Criminal Court (ICC) (2012a) Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC-01/04-01/06) trial chamber I, judgment pursuant to article 74 of the Statute

    Google Scholar 

  • International Criminal Court (ICC) (2012b) Separate and dissenting opinion of judge Odio Benito, Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC-01/04-01/06) judgment pursuant to article 74 of the Statute

    Google Scholar 

  • International Criminal Court (ICC) (2014) Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC-01/04-01/06 A 5), appeals chamber, judgment on the appeal of Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against his conviction

    Google Scholar 

  • International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) (1995) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic aka “Dule” (Decision on the Defence motion for interlocutory appeal on jurisdiction)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organisation (ILO) (1999) Convention concerning the prohibition and immediate action for the elimination of the worst forms of child labour. International Labour Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Interpeace. http://www.interpeace.org/

  • Kuper J (1997) International law concerning child civilians in armed conflict. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefaard T (2016) Child soldiers: towards a rights-based imagery. In: Brants C, Hol A, Siegel D (eds) Transitional justice. Images and memories. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 161–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Machel G (1996) Promotion and protection of the rights of children: Impact of armed conflict on children, report of the expert of the secretary general, United Nations General Assembly A/51/306

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine A, Hossain M, Zimmerman C (2016) Sex trafficking and sexual exploitation in settings affected by armed conflicts in Africa, Asia and the Middle East: systematic review. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 16:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-016-0107-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray D (2016) Practitioners’ guide to human rights law in armed conflict. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict (Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict) (2013) Working paper no. 1: the six grave violations against children during armed conflict: the legal foundation. United Nations, New York. Available at https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/publications/WorkingPaper-1_SixGraveViolationsLegalFoundation.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict (Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict) Six Grave Violations. Available at https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/effects-of-conflict/six-grave-violations/

  • Paris Principles and Guidelines on Children Associated with Armed Forces or Armed Groups (Paris Principles) (2007) Available at https://www.unicef.org/emerg/files/ParisPrinciples310107English.pdf

  • Pejic J (2005) Procedural principles and safeguards for internment/administrative detention in armed conflict and other situations of violence. Int Rev Red Cross 87:375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pobjoy JM (2017) The child in international refugee law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949a, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (AP I), of 8 June 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949b, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (AP II), of 8 June 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassòli M, Bouvier AA, Quintin A (2011) How does law protect in war? Cases, documents and teaching materials on contemporary practice in international humanitarian law. International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Second Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict (OPAC), adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly Resolution 54/263 of 25 May 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict (2017) Presentation of the report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict to the Human Rights Council 7 Mar 2017. Available at https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/statement/report-human-rights-council/

  • Tamashiro T (2010) Impact of conflict on children’s health and disability, paper commissioned for the EFA global monitoring report 2011, The hidden crisis: armed conflict and education

    Google Scholar 

  • The Paris Commitments to Protect Children from Unlawful Recruitment or Use by Armed Forces or Armed Groups (Paris Commitments) (2007) Available at https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/pariscommitments_en.pdf

  • UNICEF (1997) Cape Town principles and best practices adopted at the symposium on the prevention of recruitment of children into the armed forces and on demobilization and social reintegration of child soldiers in Africa. Available at https://www.unicef.org/emerg/files/Cape_Town_Principles(1).pdf

  • UNICEF (2002) Children affected by armed conflict: UNICEF actions. UNICEF, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2009) Machel study 10-year strategic review: children and conflict in a changing world. UNICEF, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2016a) Nearly a quarter of the world’s children live in conflict or disaster-stricken countries. Available at https://www.unicef.org/media/media_93863.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2017

  • UNICEF (2016b) The state of the world’s children 2016: a fair chance for every child. UNICEF, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2016c) Uprooted: the growing crisis for refugees and migrant children. UNICEF, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2016d) One in four children in conflict zones are out of school. Available at https://www.unicef.org/media/media_89782.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2017

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (1998) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/1998/18

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (1999) Resolution 1261 S/RES/1261

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2000) Resolution 1314 S/RES/1314

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2001) Resolution 1379 S/RES/1379

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2002a) Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2002b) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2002/12

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2003) Resolution 1460 S/RES/1460

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2004) Resolution 1539 S/RES/1539

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2005a) Resolution 1612 S/RES/1612

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2005b) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2005/8

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2006a) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2006/48

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2006b) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2006/33

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2008a) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2008/28

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2008b) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2008/6

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2009a) Resolution 1882 S/RES/1882

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2009b) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2009/9

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2010) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2010/10

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2011) Resolution 1998 S/RES/1998

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2012) Resolution 2068 S/RES/2068

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2013) Statement by the president of the security council S/PRST/2013/8

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2014a) Resolution 2143 S/RES/2143

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2014b) Report of the secretary-general on children and armed conflict in the democratic republic of the Congo S/2014/453

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2014c) Children and armed conflict: report of the Secretary-General S/2014/339

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council (2015) Resolution 2225 S/RES/2225

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Security Council Subsidiary Organs, Working Group on Children in Armed Conflict. Available at https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/en/subsidiary/wgcaac

  • United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq & Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNAMI and OHCHR) (2014) Report on the protection of civilians in armed conflict in Iraq: 6 July–10 Sept 2014. Available at http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/IQ/UNAMI_OHCHR_POC_Report_FINAL_6July_10September2014.pdf

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (1992) Day of general discussion on children in armed conflict (CRC DGD 1992) CRC/C/10, 19 Oct 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2001) General comment no. 1 on the aims of education CRC/GC/2001/1

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2003a) General comment no. 4 on adolescent health and development in the context of the convention on the Rights of the Child CRC/GC/2003/4

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2003b) General comment no. 3 on HIV/AIDS and the rights of the child CRC/GC/2003/3

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2005) General comment no. 6 in the treatment of unaccompanied and separated children outside their country of origin CRC/GC/2005/6

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2007a) General comment no. 10 on children’s rights in juvenile justice CRC/C/GC/10

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2007b) General comment no. 9 on the rights of children with disabilities CRC/C/GC/9

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2009a) General comment no. 12 on the right of the child to be heard CRC/C/GC/12

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2009b) General comment no. 11 on indigenous children and their rights under the convention CRC/C/GC/11

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2011) General comment no. 13 on the right of the child to freedom from all forms of violence CRC/C/GC/13

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2013a) General comment no. 17 on the right of the child to rest, leisure, play, recreational activities, cultural life and the arts (art. 31) CRC/C/GC/17

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2013b) General comment no. 16 on state obligations regarding the impact of the business sector on children’s rights CRC/C/GC/16

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women and Committee on the Rights of the Child (2014) Joint general recommendation No. 31 of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women/General comment no. 18 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child on harmful practices, CEDAW/C/GC/31/CRC/C/GC/18

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2016) General comment no. 20 on the implementation of the rights of the child during adolescence, CRC/C/GC/20

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (1989) United Nations General Assembly Resolution 44/25

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic and Social Council (UNESC) (1986) Report of the working group on a draft convention on the rights of the child E/CN.4/1986/39

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (1997) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [on the report of the Third Committee (A/51/615)] 51/77. The rights of the child. A/RES/51/77

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2016) Annual report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General for Children and Armed Conflict A/HRC/34/44

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2017) Implementation of the resolution establishing the international, impartial and independent mechanism to assist in the investigation and prosecution of persons responsible for the most serious crimes under international law committed in the Syrian Arab Republic since March 2011 A/71/755

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (Beijing Rules) General Assembly Resolution 40/33 of 29 Nov 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Treaty Collection, Convention of the Rights of the Child, Declarations and Reservations (Andorra, Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Netherlands, Spain, Uruguay). Available at https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&lang=en

  • Watch List on Children and Armed Conflict (2016) 2015 annual report

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) World development report: conflict, security, and development. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cécile Aptel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aptel, C. (2018). The Protection of Children in Armed Conflicts. In: Kilkelly, U., Liefaard, T. (eds) International Human Rights of Children. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3182-3_17-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3182-3_17-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3182-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3182-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    The Protection of Children in Armed Conflicts
    Published:
    27 July 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3182-3_17-2

  2. Original

    The Protection of Children in Armed Conflicts
    Published:
    18 April 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3182-3_17-1