Introduction
International trade agreements are formal accords under international law involving two or more countries. Multilateral trade agreements are negotiated by the members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and set out rules and regulations for the conduct of international trade among the majority (164) of sovereign nation states (about 164). All WTO members must agree to the negotiated trade provisions and are required to define specific commitments in national legislation to insure consistency with the rules. Similar procedures are followed for regional and bilateral – also known as “preferential” – trade agreements. If a party to an international trade agreement violates any of the commitments it has made, other parties may seek redress through the organization governing the agreement. To handle these situations, trade agreements include procedures for dispute settlement that usually involve...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bown, C. P., & Hoekman, B. M. (2005). WTO dispute settlement and the missing developing country cases: Engaging the private sector. Journal of International Economic Law, 8(4), 861–890.
Calle, Maria-Alejandra. (n.d.). Environmental concerns and trade disputes: An overview from the GATT and the WTO dispute settlement system,” Cork Online Law Review at: http://www.corkonlinelawreview.com/editions/2012/EnvironmentalConcernsAndTradeDisputesAnOverviewFromTheGATTAndTheWTODisputeSettlementSystem.MariaAlejandraCalle.pdf. Accessed 6 Nov 2012.
Chan, Sewell. (2010). U.S. and Brazil Reach agreement on cotton dispute, New York Times, 6 Apr.
Guernsey, Paul. (2010). The disturbing facts about Dolphin-Safe Tuna, All About Wildlife, at: http://www.allaboutwildlife.com/dolphins-whales/the-disturbing-facts-about-dolphin-safe-tuna/4298. Accessed on 5 Nov 2012.
Hobbs, J. (2014). Canada, US-EU beef hormone dispute. In P. B. Thompson & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of food and agricultural ethics. Dordrecht: Springer Publishers.
Marceau, G. (2002). WTO dispute settlement and human rights. European Journal of International Law, 13(4), 753–914.
Matteotti, Sofya, & Olga Nartova. (2011). Process and production methods: Implementation and monitoring, NCRR Trade Working Paper Number 2011/19, June, available at: http://ebookbrowse.com/nccr-ppms-pdf-d221613569. Accessed 15 Nov 2012.
Milanovic, B. (2011). The haves and the have-nots: A brief and idiosyncratic history of global inequality. New York: Basic Books.
Mosoti, V. (2006). Africa in the first decade of dispute settlement. Journal of International Economic Law, 9(2), 427–453.
Perrin, W. F., Wursig, B., & Thewissen, J. G. M. (2002). The tuna-dolphin issue. In W. F. Perrin, B. Wursig, & J. G. M. Thewissen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of marine mammals (pp. 1269–1273). San Diego: Academic Press.
Peterson, E. Wesley F. (2009). A billion dollars a day: The economics and politics of agricultural subsidies. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Peterson, E. Wesley F. (2014). Food and agricultural trade and national sovereignty. In P. B. Thompson & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of food and agricultural ethics. Dordrecht: Springer Publishers.
Sen, A. K. (1970). The impossibility of a paretian liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78(1), 152–157.
Singer, P. (2004). One world (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Trujillo, Elizabeth. (2012). The Tuna-Dolphin encore– WTO rules on environmental labeling, ASIL Insights, 16(7). http://www.asil.org/insights120307.cfm.
USDA (2014). United States and Brazil Reach agreement to end WTO cotton dispute, United States Department of Agriculture News Release No. 0219.14, 1 Oct 2014, Washington, DC.
WTO (2012a). Understanding the WTO: Settling disputes, World Trade Organization, Geneva, available at: http://www.wto.prg/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/disp1_e.htm. Accessed 8 Nov 2012.
WTO (2012b). Current status of the disputes,” World Trade Organization, Geneva, at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_current_status_e.htm. Accessed 13 Nov 2012.
WTO (2012c). Mexico etc. versus US: Tuna-Dolphin, World Trade Organization, Geneva, available at: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/edis04_3.htm. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
WTO (2012d). United States – measures concerning the importation, marketing, and sale of Tuna and Tuna Products, World Trade Organization, Geneva, available at: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds381_e.htm. Asccessed 15 Nov 2012.
WTO (2012e). India etc. versus US: Shrimp-turtle, World Trade Organization, Geneva, available at: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/edis08_e.htm. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
WTO (2014). United States– subsidies on upland cotton, World Trade Organization, Geneva at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dspu_e/cases_e/ds267_e.htm. Asccessed 21 Jan 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Peterson, E.W.F. (2016). WTO Dispute Settlement and Food and Agricultural Trade. In: Thompson, P., Kaplan, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_423-6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_423-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
WTO Dispute Settlement and Food and Agricultural Trade- Published:
- 26 December 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_423-6
-
Original
WTO Dispute Settlement and Food and Agricultural Trade- Published:
- 10 April 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_423-5