Zusammenfassung
Der Beitrag bietet eine problemorientierte Skizze der Sozialpolitik in den USA. Aus einer vergleichenden Perspektive werden dabei sowohl konzeptionelle als auch empirische Besonderheiten des US-amerikanischen Wohlfahrtsregimes diskutiert. Anhand der Bereiche Alterssicherung und Sozialhilfe werden die Kernmerkmale von US-Sozialpolitik herausgearbeitet, die sich insbesondere im Bereich der privaten Absicherung und der staatlichen Subventionierung von Sozialpolitik über das Steuersystem zeigen.
Notes
- 1.
Für eine detaillierte Betrachtung der Thematik siehe auch Grell und Lammert 2013.
Literatur
Albert, Vicky. 2000. Reducing welfare benefits: Consequences for adequacy of and eligibility for benefits. Social Work. Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 45(4): 300–310.
Amenta, Edwin. 1998. Bold relief: Institutional politics and the origins of modern social policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 2019. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/policybasics-foodstamps.pdf. Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.
Center on Budget und Policy Priorities. 2012. The earned income tax credit. Washington, DC: CBPP.
Congressional Research Service. 2019. Social security primer. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42035.pdf. Zugegriffen am 14.08.2019.
Copeland, Craig. 2014. Employment-based retirement plan participation: Geographic differences and trends, 2013. Washington, DC: Employment Benefits Research Institute Issue Brief. https://www.ebri.org/content/employment-based-retirement-plan-participation-geographic-differences-and-trends-2013-5451. Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.
DeNavas, Carmen, Bernadette Proctor, und Cheryl Lee. 2018. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2017. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2018/demo/p60-263.pdf. Zugegriffen am 14.08.2019.
Eslami, Esa, Kai Filion, und Mark Strayer. 2011. Characteristics of supplemental nutrition assistance program households: Fiscal year 2010. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2002. Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Falk, Gene, Karen E. Lynch, und Jessica Tollestrup. 2018. Federal Spending on benefits and Services for People with Low Income: In Brief. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45097.pdf. Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.
Fraser, Nancy, und Linda Gordon. 1997. Abhängigkeit im Sozialstaat. Genealogie eines Schlüsselbegriffs. In Die halbierte Gerechtigkeit, Hrsg. Nancy Fraser, 180–220. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Garfinkel, Irwin, Lee Rainwater, und Timothy Smeeding. 2010. Wealth & welfare states. Is America a laggard or leader? Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Golshan, Tara. 2019. Trump said he wouldn’t cut Medicaid, social security, and medicare. His 2020 budget cuts all 3, Vox News, March 12. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/3/12/18260271/trump-medicaid-social-security-medicare-budget-cuts. Zugegriffen am 14.08.2019.
Grell, Britta, und Christian Lammert. 2013. Sozialpolitik in den USA, Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Howard, Christopher. 1997. The hidden welfare state. Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Leman, Christopher. 1977. Patterns of policy development: Social security in the United States and Canada. Public Policy 25:261–291.
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The submerged state. How invisible government policies undermine American democracy. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Munnell, Alicia, und Laura Quinby. 2009. Pension coverage and retirement security. Chestnut Hill: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
Nichols, John. 2011. The Nation: Obama’s social security dilemma. NPR News. http://www.npr.org/2011/01/25/133207198/the-nation-obamas-social-security-dilemma. Zugegriffen am 11.10.2013.
OECD. 2010. Employment outlook 2010. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. 2019. Social Expenditure Database. https://www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm.
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. The politics of pensions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880–1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Peter, Waltraut. 2005. Der amerikanische earned income tax credit als Beispiel einer „make work pay“-Strategie. In I.W-Trends – Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung. http://www.iwkoeln.de/de/studien/iw-trends/beitrag/53895. Zugegriffen am 11.10.2013.
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:369–404.
Titmuss, Richard M. 1976. Commitment to welfare. London: Harper Collins.
US Department of Labor. 2018. Private pension plan bulletin. Washington, DC: Historical Tables and Graphs.
US House of Representatives. 2012. 2011 Green Book. Chapter TANF. Tables and Figures. Washington, DC: U.S.
Weaver, Kent R. 2000. Ending welfare as we know it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Weir, Margaret, Ann Shola Orloff, und Theda Skocpol. 1988. Understanding American social policy. In The politics of social policy in the United States, Hrsg. Dies, 3–27. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wolch, Jennifer. 1990. The Shadow. State: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.
Wolfe, Alan. 1975. The limits of legitimacy: Political contradictions of contemporary capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lammert, C. (2019). Sozialpolitik. In: Lammert, C., Siewert, M., Vormann, B. (eds) Handbuch Politik USA. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_23-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_23-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04125-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04125-0
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Sozialpolitik- Published:
- 14 June 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_23-3
-
Sozialpolitik
- Published:
- 21 October 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_23-2
-
Original
Sozialpolitik in den USA: Zwischen Markt und Staat- Published:
- 08 October 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_23-1