Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regimewandel und Demokratie durch Transitional Justice

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbuch Transitional Justice

Part of the book series: Springer NachschlageWissen ((SRS))

  • 235 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Transitional Justice (TJ) kann den Regimewechsel und –wandel politischer Systeme langfristig beeinflussen, sowohl demokratischen Wandel als auch autoritären. Bei TJ handelt es sich um einen langfristigen Prozess und eine Vielzahl von Instrumenten, Mechanismen und Verfahren – den Maßnahmen – die von unterschiedlichen Akteuren zum Regimewandel aber auch zum Regimeerhalt genutzt werden. Diese Akteure setzen gezielt TJ Maßnahmen für ihre jeweiligen politischen Ziele ein. In diesem Beitrag wird der Zusammenhang zwischen TJ und dem demokratischen als auch dem autokratisch-diktatorischer Wandel aufgezeigt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aiken, Nevin T. 2013. Identity, reconciliation and transitional justice, overcoming intractability in divided societies. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrieu, Kora. 2011. An unfinished business: Transitional justice and democratization in post-soviet Russia. International Journal of Transitional Justice 5:198–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backer, David. 2003. Civil society and transitional justice: Possibilities, patterns and prospects. Journal of Human Rights 3:297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddiss, Michael. 1995. Victors’ justice? The Nuremberg tribunal. History Today 45(5): 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brems, Eva. 2011. Transitional justice in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Transitional Justice 5:282–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Laura. 2010. The European Union and transitional justice. In Initiative for peacebuilding. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Greiff, Pablo. 2012. Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation, and guarantees of non-recurrence (A/HRC/21/46). Geneva: Human Rights Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vlaming, Frederick. 2012. No luxury to set an Agenda: The Yugoslavia tribunal’s prosecutorial policy towards transitional justice. In Transitional justice: Between criminal justice, Atonement and democracy, SIM Special, Hrsg. A. Mihr, Bd. 37, 53–82. Utrecht: Netherlands Institute of Human Rights/Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry, und Leonardo Morlino. 2005. Assessing the quality of democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the books: Transitional justice in historical perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Encarnación, Omar G. 2008. Reconciliation after democratization: Coping with the past in Spain. Political Science Quarterly 123(3): 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frei, Norbert, Brunner, José, und Goschler, Constantin, Hrsg. 2009. Die Praxis der Wiedergutmachung, Geschichte, Erfahrung und Wirkung in Deutschland und Israel. Göttingen: Wallenstein Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaby Ore, Aguilar und Gomez Isa, Felipa, Hrsg. 2011. Rethinking transitions, equality and social justice in societies from conflict. Antwerp: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James L. 2006. The contribution of truth to reconciliation, lessons from South Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50:409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gready, Paul. 2009. Telling truth? The methodological challenges of truth commissions. In Methods of Human Rights Research, Hrsg. Fons Coomans, Fred Grünfeld, und Menno T. Kamminga, 159–185. Antwerp: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, Pierre. 2006. Measuring the impact of punishment and forgiveness: A framework for evaluating transitional justice. International Review of the Red Cross. 88:19–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herf, Jeffrey. 1997. Divided memory: The Nazi Past in the two Germanys. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, Csilla. 2006. The misuses of manipulation: The failure of transitional justice in post-communist Hungary. Europe-Asia Studies 58(6): 925–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneuer, Marianne. 2007. Demokratisierung durch die EU, Süd- und Ostmitteleuropa im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansdottir, Edda, André Nollkaemper, und Cedric Rygnart, Hrsg. 2012. International law in domestic courts: Rule of law reform in post conflict states. Antwerp: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauth, Hans-Joachim, und Ulrike Liebert. 1999. Im Schatten demokratischer Legitimität. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Sozialwissenschaftlicher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, John Paul. 1998. Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington DC: United States Institute for Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies, patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J., und Alfred Stepan, Hrsg. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Martin Seymour. 1959. Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53:69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Rieckh, Akexander, und Pablo de Greiff, Hrsg. 2007. Justice as prevention: Vetting public employees in transitional societies, Advancing Transitional Justice Series. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, James A., Hrsg. 1997. Transitional justice and the rule of law in new democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2008. Systemtransformation. Wiesbaden: VS Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihr, Anja. 2012. Transitional justice and the quality of democracy – From democratic institution building to reconciliation. In Transitional justice: Between criminal justice, atonement and democracy, Hrsg. A. Mihr, 11–52. Utrecht: SIM – Netherlands Institute of Human Rights-Utrecht University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihr, Anja. 2013. Transitional justice and the quality of democracy. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 7(2): 298–313. Bielefeldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, Leonardo. 2011. Authoritarian legacies, politics of the past and the quality of democracy in Southern Europe: Open conclusions’. In Dealing with the legacy of authoritarianism, The „Politics of the Past“ in Southern European democracies, Hrsg. Antonio Costa Pino und Leonardo Morlino. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, Gerado, und Jay Verkuilen. 2002. Conceptualizing and measuring democracy. In Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34. Sage Publication.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, Gunnar. 1957. Rich lands and poor, World perspectives, Bd. 16. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus. 2003. Herausforderungen der Demokratie, Zur Integrations- und Leistungsfähigkeit politischer Institutionen. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, T.D., L.A. Payne, und A.G. Reiter. 2010. Transitional justice in balance, Comparing processes, Weighing efficacy. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peskin, Victor. 2005. Beyond victor’s justice? The challenge of prosecuting the winners at the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Journal of Human Rights 4(2): 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priban, Jiri, Pauline Roberts, und James Young, Hrsg. 2003. System of justice in transition, Central European experience since 1989. Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Joanna R. 2009. Haiti’s failed truth commission: Lessons in transitional justice. Journal of Human Rights 8(3): 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, Kollmorgen, Wolfgang Merkel, und Hans-Joachim Wagner, Hrsg. 2014. Handbuch Transformationsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, Andrew. 2000. Amnesty and Amnesia in Spain. Peace Review 12(1): 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig, Terence. 2009. Executive leadership and the continuing quest for justice in Argentina. Human Rights Quarterly 31(3): 721–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 1998. Truth commissions and Amnesties in Latin America: The second generation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 92:313–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Marc Howard. 2004. Ritual and the politics of reconciliation. In From conflict resolution to reconciliation, Hrsg. Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov, 197–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rustow, Dankwart A. 1970. Transition to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics 2(3): 337–363. 344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sancar, Mithat. 2007. Coming to terms with the past in Turkey: Being realistic, asking for the impossible. In From the Burden of the past to societal peace and democracy, Hrsg. Heinrich Böll Foundation, 29–36. Istanbul: Heinrich Böll Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabas, William, und Nadia Bernaz. 2012. Routledge handbook of international criminal law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Siegmar, Gert Pickel, und Pickel Susanne , Hrsg. 2009. Amnesie, Amnestie oder Aufarbeitung? Zum Umgang mit autoritären Vergangenheiten und Menschenrechtsverletzungen. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Carsten Q., und Philippe C. Schmitter. 2004. Liberalisation, Transition and consolidation: Measuring the components of democratisation. In Democratisations, A frank cass journal; Consolidated or defective democracy? Problems of regime change, Special Issue, Hrsg. Aurel Croissant und Wolfgang Merkel. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinner Halev, Jeff. 2012. Enduring injustice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spinner-Halev, Jeff. 2003. Education, reconciliation and nested identities. Theory and Research in Education 1:51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stan, Lavinia, Hrsg. 2008. Transitional justice in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, reckoning with the communist past. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach, Peter. 1998. Vergangenheit als Last und Chance: Vergangenheitsbewältigung in den 50er- Jahren. In Die Bundesrepublik wird souverän 1950–1955, Hrsg. J. Weber, 333–373. München: BLpB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamarit Sumalla, Josep Maria. 2013. Historical memory and criminal justice in Spain‘ 14 series in transitional justice. Antwerp: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Yuki. 2002. Japan’s comfort women: Sexual slavery and prostitution during World War II and the US occupation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, Ruti. 2004. How are the new democracies of the Southern Cone Dealing with the legacy of past Human Rights Abuses?’. In Transitional justice. How emerging democracies reckon with former regimes, Hrsg. Neil Kritz, Bd. 1, 146–153. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, Ruti. 2014. Globalizing transitional justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, Oskar N. T., Ron, James, und Paris, Roland. 2010. State-level effects of transitional justice: What do we know? In 4 The International Journal of Transitional Justice, Special Issue: Transitional justice on trial – Evaluating its impact, 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, Van der Merwe, Baxter, Victoria, und Chapman, Audrey R., Hrsg. 2009. Assessing the impact of transitional justice: Challenges for empirical research. Washington, DC: USIP Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollnhals, Clemens. 1991. Entnazifierung. Politische Säuberung und Rehabilitierung in den vier Besatzungszonen 1945–1949. München: DTV Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizäcker, Richard. 2001. Drei Mal Stunde Null? 1949, 1969, 1989. Deutschland europäische Zukunft. Berlin: Siedler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiffen, Brigitte. 2011. Der vergessene Faktor – Zum Einfluss von Transitional Justice auf die Entwicklung von Rechtsstaatlichkeit in Demokratisierungsprozessen. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 5:51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, Christian. 2002. Effective democracy, mass culture, and the quality of elites: The human development perspective. International Journal of Cultural Studies 43:317–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebelhaus-Brahm, Eric. 2010. Truth commissions and transitional justice: The impact on human rights and democracy. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirsching, Andreas, Zarusky Jürgen, Tschubarjan Alexander, und Viktor Ischtschenko, Hrsg. 2015. Erinnerung an Diktatur und Krieg: Brennpunkte des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. Göttingern: Walter de Gruyter Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrum, Edgar. 2007. Die geglückte Demokratie, Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von ihren Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Bonn: Klett Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

UN Dokumente

  • UN-General Assembly, International Year of Reconciliation, 2009. Addendum, 61st session, UN Doc A/61/L.22/Add.1, 20 Nov 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA Governance Platform, Center on Governance through Human Rights, Pariser Platz 6, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland

    Anja Mihr

Authors
  1. Anja Mihr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Mihr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Utrecht University, Netherlands Institute of Human Rights Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Anja Mihr

  2. Universität Leipzig Theologische Fakultät, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany

    Gert Pickel

  3. Univ. Duisburg-Essen Inst. f. Politikwissenschaft, Duisburg, Germany

    Susanne Pickel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mihr, A. (2016). Regimewandel und Demokratie durch Transitional Justice. In: Mihr, A., Pickel, G., Pickel, S. (eds) Handbuch Transitional Justice. Springer NachschlageWissen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02994-4_14-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02994-4_14-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02994-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Regimewandel und Demokratie durch Transitional Justice
    Published:
    27 February 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02994-4_14-2

  2. Original

    Regimewandel und Demokratie durch Transitional Justice
    Published:
    13 August 2015

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02994-4_14-1

Search

Navigation