Abstract
Learning anywhere, anytime is becoming ever more a daily routine, due to the increasing and recent growth of information and communication technologies. In the last 5 years, their key characteristic and specifically in the use of mobile equipment and software have been their portability, mobility, and network access. The technological development, including software applications available for the implementation of three-dimensional contents, has been following this trend. Hence, it is important to know whether and how these three-dimensional contents are being integrated in educational situations, namely, regarding augmented reality and mobile learning. Thus, a synthesis of Portuguese and international research works and case studies on the use of three-dimensional augmented reality is chronologically presented along with the evolution of information and communication technologies. The main goal of this knowledge mapping is to contribute to the state of the art in three-dimensional augmented reality technologies in education. In addition, it is aimed at framing the creation and implementation of three-dimensional content in higher education, specifically in the field of mathematics.
References
Azuma, R. 1997. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(4): 355–385.
Billinghurst, M. 2011. The future of augmented reality in our everyday life. In Proceedings of the 19th international display workshops, Nagoya
Billinghurst, M., H. Katob, and I. Poupyrev. 2001. CyberMath – The Magic Book: A transitional AR interface. Computers & Graphics 25: 745–753.
Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536–544. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017
Cardoso, Teresa, Jacinto Antunes Celorico and Isabel Alarcão. 2007. MAECC® – discovering a new model to analyse and explore scientific knowledge. In Proceedings of the international Council for Educational Media/Innovative Learning Environments – ICEM/ILE – 2007 conference, educational media and innovative practices: Challenges and visions. http://www.ua.pt/cidtff%5Clale/ReadObject.aspx?obj=12623
Cardoso, Teresa, Isabel Alarcão, and Jacinto Antunes Celorico. 2010. Revisão da Literatura e Sistematização do Conhecimento. Porto: Porto Editora.
Cardoso, Teresa, Isabel Alarcão, and Jacinto Antunes Celorico. 2013. MAECC®: um caminho para mapear investigação. IndagatioDidactica, 5(2) Tecnologias da Informação em Educação. http://revistas.ua.pt/index.php/ID/article/view/2452/2323. Accessed 29 Dec 2013.
Carmigniani, J., B. Furht, M. Anisetti, P. Ceravolo, E. Damiani, and M. Ivkovic. 2011. Augmented reality technologies systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications 51(1): 341–377.
Di Serio, Á., et al. 2013. Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education 68: 586–596.
Feiner, Steven, B. Macintyre, and D. Selgman. 1993. Knowledge-based augmented reality. Communications of ACM 36(7): 53–62.
Fonseca, D., et al. 2014. Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of augmented reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in Human Behavior 31: 434–445.
Inkpen, K. 1997. Adapting the human-computer interface to support collaborative learning environments for children. Ph.d. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia.
Ismail, I., R. Idrus, and T. Gunasegaran. 2010. Motivation, psychology and language effect on mobile learning in Universiti Sains Malaysia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 4(4): 31–36. doi:10.3991/ijim.v4i4.1408.
Kamarainen, A., et al. 2013. EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education 68: 545–556.
Kancherla A., J. Rolland, D. Wright, and G. Burdea. 1995. A novel virtual reality tool for teaching dynamic 3D anatomy. In Proceedings of CVR med, vol. 95, 163–169. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-49197-2_18
Kaufmann, H., and D. Schmalstieg. 2003. Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics 27: 339–345.
Liarokapis, F., N. Mourkoussis, M. White, J. Darcy, M. Sifniotis, P. Petridis, A. Basu, and P. Lister. 2004. Web3D and augmented reality to support engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 3(1): 11–14.
Lu, S.C.-Y., M. Shpitalni, and R. Gadh. 1999. Virtual and augmented reality technologies for product realization. Annals of the CIRP 48: 471–495.
Maier, P., G. Klinker, and M. Tonnis. 2009. Augmented reality for teaching spatial relations. In Proceedings from the conference of the International Journal of Arts & Sciences, Toronto, May 25–28, 2009
Martin-Gutierrez, J., et al. 2012. Improving strategy of self-learning in engineering: Laboratories with augmented reality. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 5: 832–839.
Milgram, P. 2006. Some human factors considerations for designing mixed reality interfaces. Virtual media for military applications. In Meeting proceedings RTO-MP-HFM-136, Keynote 1, Neuilly-sur-Seine. http://www.rto.nato.int/abstracts.asp. Accessed 29 Dec 2013.
Milgram, P., H. Takemura, A. Utsumi, and F. Kishino. 1994. Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. SPIE, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies 2351: 282–292.
Nagler, E. 1994. Two-dimensional reality courtesy of camera and computer: No headset, no mouse, no keyboard even – Videoplace does it all. ProQuest Historical Newspapers. New York Times (1857-Current File). Document ID: 116374743.
Nee, A., et al. 2012. Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 61: 657–679.
New Media Consortium. 2005. The horizon report. National learning infrastructure initiative. Stanford: McGraw Hill.
Quirós, M., I. Carda, and E. Camahort. 2008. Collaborative augmented reality for inorganic chemistry education. In: Proceedings of the5th WSEAS/IASME international conference on Engineering Education (EE’08), Heraklion, 2008, 271–277
Salinas, P., E. González-Mendívil, E. Quintero, H. Ríos, H. Ramírez, and S. Morales. 2013. The development of a didactic prototype for the learning of mathematics through augmented reality. 2013 international conference on virtual and augmented reality in education. Procedia Computer Science 25:62–70.
Schmalstieg, D., T. Langlotz, and M. Billinghurst. 2011. Augmented reality 2.0. Vienna: Springer.
Structure sensor. 2014. http://youtu.be/39v5OoBJFDk. Accessed 21 Dec 2014.
Sturman, D.J., and D. Zeltzer. 1994. A survey of glove-based input. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 14(1): 30–39.
Sutherland, Ivan E. 1968. A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the AFIPS ‘68, fall joint computer conference, part I, 757–764. doi: 10.1145/1476589.1476686. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1476686
Thomas, Bruce, B. Close, J. Donoghue, J. Squires, P.D. Bondi, and W. Piekarski. 2002. First person indoor/outdoor augmented reality application: ARQuake. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6(1): 75–86.
Vaughan-Nichols, S.J. 2009. Augmented reality: No longer a novelty? Computer 42(12): 19–22.
Weidenbach, M., C. Wick, S. Pieper, K.J. Quast, T. Fox, G. Grunst, and D.A. Redel. 2000. Reality simulator for training in two-dimensional echocardiography. Computers and Biomedical Research 33: 11–22.
Wojciechowski, R., and W. Cellary. 2013. Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education 68: 570–585.
Wu, H., et al. 2013. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education 62: 41–49.
Zhao, Q. 2009. A survey on virtual reality. Science in China Series F: Information Sciences 52(3): 348–400.
Acknowledgments
AMCUBED, LDA.
LANSYS, LDA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cardoso, T., Coimbra, T., Mateus, A. (2015). Augmented Reality and 3D Technologies: Mapping Case Studies in Education. In: Zhang, Y. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_84-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_84-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Augmented Reality and 3D Technologies: Mapping Case Studies in Education- Published:
- 13 October 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_84-2
-
Original
Augmented Reality and 3D Technologies: Mapping Case Studies in Education- Published:
- 20 April 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_84-1