Skip to main content

Development Cannibalism and the Sustainable Development Goals

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Partnerships for the Goals

Definitions

In an allusion to cannibalism which refers to the eating of one by another of one’s own species, “development cannibalism” refers to the situation where one development organization with the aim of improving its capacity to achieve set goals deploys various strategies to draw in resources belonging to another development entity which are critical to the survival or success of that organization leading to that entity’s eventual collapse. To illustrate, development cannibalism is when actors responsible for implementing development program A use various strategies covert, overt, or both to entice or draw in resources of development program B they consider necessary for their program to succeed leading to the collapse of development program B. These resources may be staff, key partners, funds, etc.

The sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a set of 17 goals adopted by the United Nations as “the blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all” (United...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya A, de Lima F, Moore M (2006) Proliferation and fragmentation: transactions costs and the value of aid. J Dev Stud 42(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander C (2020) The soft power of development: aid and assistance as public diplomacy activities. In: Servaes J (ed) Handbook of communication for development and social change. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2014-3_74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arko B (2019) Translating discourses of local economic development: the case of the Ghana decent work programme. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Bayreuth, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakuwa RC, Chasimpha F, Masamba J (2013) Staff retention in developing countries: a case study of an NGO in the health sector. Int J Human Res Stud 3(1):158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brech V, Potrafke N (2014) Donor ideology and types of foreign aid. J Comp Econ 42(1):61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandy L, Kharas H (2011) Why can’t we all just get along? The practical limits to international development cooperation. J Int Dev 23:739–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Williamson CR (2011) Rhetoric versus reality: the best and worst of aid agency practices. World Dev 39(11):1930–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson J (1994) The anti-politics machine: “development,” depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R, Shragge E (2017) Resourcing community organizing: examples from England and Quebec. Community Dev J 52(3):454–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring K, Michaelowa K, Dreher A, Spörri F (2017) Aid fragmentation and effectiveness: what do we really know? World Dev 99:320–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulrajani N, Swiss L (2019) Donor proliferation to what ends? New donor countries and the search for legitimacy. Can J Dev Stud/Revue canadienne d’études du développement 40(3):348–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Agency Taskforce on Financing for Development (2016) Official development assistance. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Financing for Development Office, UN-DESA (FFDO/UNDESA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharas H (2007) Trends and issues in development aid. Wolfensohn Center for development working paper, (1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack S, Rahman A (2004) Donor fragmentation and bureaucratic quality in aid recipients. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kotey S (2015) Effect of local counterpart funding delay on procurement of Donor Funded Projects (Master’s dissertation), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn JF (2009) Aid coordination on the ground: are joint country assistance strategies the answer? Wolfensohn Center for Development Working Paper, (10)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse D (2005) Cultivating development: an ethnography of aid policy and practice. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan V, Attaran A (2003) Roll back malaria? The scarcity of international aid for malaria control. Malar J 2(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert D (1996) The role of local brokers in the development system. Experiences with “self-help projects” in East Africa. Bulletin de l’APAD 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogin J (2019) The Trump administration prepares a new assault on U.S. soft power. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/the-trump-administration-prepares-a-new-assault-on-us-soft-power/2019/09/19/398c8a9e-db13-11e9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html. Accessed 07.08.2020

  • Scott JC (2008) Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • SDG Tracker (2020). https://sdg-tracker.org/global-partnerships#targets. Accessed 09.08.2020

  • Stibbe DT, Reid S, Gilbert J (2019) Maximising the Impact of Partnerships for the SDGs; the partnering initiative and UN DESA

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2020). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 09.08.2020

  • United Nations (undated) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods N (2011) Rethinking aid coordination. GEG Working Paper, (66)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann F, Smith K (2011) More actors, more money, more ideas for international development co-operation. J Int Dev 23(5):722–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedict Arko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Arko, B. (2021). Development Cannibalism and the Sustainable Development Goals. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Partnerships for the Goals. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_105-3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_105-3

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71067-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71067-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Development Cannibalism and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Published:
    11 February 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_105-3

  2. Development Cannibalism and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Published:
    13 December 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_105-2

  3. Original

    Development Cannibalism and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Published:
    08 November 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_105-1