Skip to main content

What Calls for Thinking in Business: Consulting as a Heideggerian Philosopher

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbook of Philosophy of Management

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Philosophy ((HP))

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

For Heidegger, thinking focuses on what is most taken for granted in any domain and in its focus transforms the domain. In business, such thinking develops cultural innovations that change the factors of competition. This chapter introduces Heideggerian thinking for business transformation. We look at the concerns managers face in adopting such thinking, explain Heidegger’s two breakthroughs: the turn to practice and the uncovering of radically different understandings of being. We show how to cultivate the thinker’s mood of wonder and set out the five movements in Heideggerian thinking including bridging radically different ways of handling what is most taken for granted. We then propose that transforming mine into yours in exchange is the most taken for granted aspect of business and show how thinking about that transformation in cement (CEMEX) and commercial insurance (RSA) leads to cultural innovations that improve exchange for both buyers and sellers. We conclude by noting that such thinking tends to blend older practices like friendship with newer ones like networking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For brevity’s sake, we will speak about the “Heideggerian philosopher,” leaving out Foucault’s name. Heidegger originated the form of thinking, while Foucault turned it into a full-fledged discipline, especially in the lecture courses at the end of his life (Foucault 2001, 2011).

  2. 2.

    The tradition of specifically Heideggerian consulting started shortly after the 1987 publication of Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores’ Understanding Computers and Cognition and the establishment of Fernando Flores’ Business Design Associates. A series of publications have followed including Disclosing New Worlds (Spinosa et al. 1997), “Taking an expanded view of customers” (Spinosa et al. 2001), “Developing productive customers in emerging markets” (Flores et al. 2003), “Promise-based management (Sull and Spinosa 2007), “Transforming crippling company politics” (Spinosa et al. 2014), and “Coping with time in organizations” (Spinosa et al. 2017). In the meantime, the field of Heideggerian Consulting has grown with VISION Consulting, Pluralistic Networks, STRATAM, Matthew Hancocks Strategic Thinking, Achieve Breakthrough, The Institute for Generative Leadership, and ReD Associates. ReD Associate’s Christian Madsbjerg has published Sensemaking (Madsbjerg 2017) and The Moment of Clarity (Madsbjerg and Rasmussen 2014).

  3. 3.

    We would make a similar argument for Christensen and Bower’s disruptions (Christiansen and Bower 1995).

  4. 4.

    We note that Steve Jobs also could transform markets as a Heideggerian thinker and did so when he saved Pixar and made its films part of our diet (Spinosa et al. 2017).

  5. 5.

    In the 1960s, Heidegger comes to think that the matter of thinking is the concealing aspect of making things intelligible or Ereignis, and not being. However, the other elements of thinking remain largely the same. The one other difference is that thinking focuses more on saying (poetry) than on dealing with things (Heidegger 1972, pp. 22–23 & 70–71). See Wrathall (forthcoming) on mystery.

  6. 6.

    Note that in calling attention to the Hebraic, Greek, and Christian traditions, Nietzsche calls our attention to practices we still participate in, justice and redemption. (Hence, the bridging practice does not supersede (and replace) past practices in the Hegelian sense. Rather, it shows how the different practices belong together.)

  7. 7.

    We surmise this origin of Nietzsche’s thought experiment because Nietzsche very clearly read Seneca. Heidegger does not give this detail.

  8. 8.

    “Blending” is cross-appropriation from Disclosing New Worlds (Spinosa et al. 1997).

  9. 9.

    Nietzsche calls his experiment his “heaviest thought” (Heidegger 1968, p. 109).

  10. 10.

    Would Heidegger countenance the claim that genuine thinking could be called by the taken-for-granted of a particular domain of activity such as business? In his “Origin of the Work of Art,” (1971, pp. 32–37), Heidegger claims that art and thinking are essentially both versions of establishing a regime of truth and that works of art can manifest what is essential to a particular domain (reliability for equipment). Thinking can do the same. Hubert Dreyfus brilliantly illuminates Heidegger’s distinction between the widely shared public world, with which thinkers are concerned when they think being, and special or subworlds like business, where thinkers think what is most taken for granted in the subworld (Dreyfus 1991, pp. 89–91).

References

  • Borgmann A (1987) Technology and the character of contemporary life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann A (2007) Cyberspace, cosmology, and the meaning of life. In Ubiquity Feb 2007. Available via http://ubiquity.acm.org/article.cfm?id=1232403. Accessed 1 May 2017

  • Bourdieu P (1992) The logic of practice. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM, Bower, JL (1995) Disruptive technologies. Harvard Business Review, January–February

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus HL (1991) Being-in-the-World. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores F, Letelier MF, Spinosa C (2003) Developing productive customers in emerging markets. California Management Review 45(4):77–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1985) The use of pleasure. Vintage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1979) Discipline and punish. Vintage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2001) The hermeneutics of the subject. Picador, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2011) The courage of truth. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1962) Being and time. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1968) What is called thinking? Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1971) Poetry, language, thought. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1972) On time and being. Harper Torchbooks, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology. Harper Torchbooks, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacson W (2011) Steve Jobs. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolowicz HF, Nicholas B (2008) Historical introduction to the study of Roman law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim WC, Mauborgne R (2005) Blue ocean strategy. Harvard, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim WC, Mauborgne R (2015) Blue ocean strategy: expanded edition. Harvard, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsbjerg C (2017) Sensemaking. Hachette, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsbjerg C, Rasmussen MB (2014) The moment of clarity: using the human sciences to solve your toughest business problems. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M (1962) The phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche F (1974) The gay science. Vintage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK (2006) The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinosa C (1994) The transformation of intentionality. English Literary Renaissance 24(2):370–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinosa C, Davis C, Glennon B (2014) Transforming crippling company politics. Organizational Dynamics 43(2):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinosa C, Flores F, Dreyfus HL (1997) Disclosing new worlds. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinosa C, Hancocks M, Glennon B (2017) Coping with time in organizations. Perspectives on process organization studies, vol 7. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spinosa C, Letelier M, Calder B (2001) Taking an expanded view of customers. Mark Res 12(4):4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sull D, Spinosa C (2007) Promise-based management: the essence of execution. Harvard Business Review 85(4):78–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Sull D (2005) Made in China. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sull D (2009) The upside of turbulence. Harper Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1958) Philosophical investigations. Basil Blackwell & Mott, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrathall MA (2011) We still need an education in thinking: Heidegger on education in a technological age, (Published in Chinese, original English from author). J Educ Stud 7(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrathall MA (2018) The Task of Thinking in a Technological Age. Heidegger on Technology, ed. Wendland, Hadjioannou, and Merwin. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeats WB (2008) Meditations in time of civil war: the stare’s nest by my window. In: The collected poems of W.B. Yeats. Wordsworth Poetry Library, Ware

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Spinosa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Spinosa, C., Hancocks, M., Glennon, B. (2018). What Calls for Thinking in Business: Consulting as a Heideggerian Philosopher. In: Neesham, C., Segal, S. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_2-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_2-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48352-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48352-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    What Calls for Thinking in Business: Consulting as a Heideggerian Philosopher
    Published:
    27 August 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_2-2

  2. Original

    What Calls for Thinking in Business: Consulting as a Heideggerian Philosopher
    Published:
    18 July 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_2-1