Synonyms
Definition
Accountability is a social relationship in which an actor feels an obligation to explain and to justify his or her conducts to some significant other.
Accountability Dimensions
A key definition of accountability is “a social relationship in which an actor feels an obligation to explain and to justify his or her conducts to some significant other” (Bovens 2010). Accountability can also be defined differently based upon social, political, cultural, and institutional conditions. In order to explain and to justify their conduct, public organizations release information about their actions to the public. Thus, accountability is often seen as “transparency” of information. This study follows the concept of accountability as managing and meeting public and other expectations for performance and for bureaucratic, legal, professional, and political responsiveness (Kearns 1996; Romzek and Dubnick 1987).
In...
References
Acar M, Guo C, Yang K (2008) Accountability when hierarchical authority is absent. Am Rev Public Adm 38(1):3–23
Behn RD (2001) Rethinking democratic accountability. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
Berman E, Wang XH (2002) Performance measurement in US counties: capacity for reform. Public Adm Rev. 60(5):409–20
Bovens M (2010) Two concepts of accountability: accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West Euro Polit 33(5):946–967
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & ’t Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Adm, 86(1), 225–242
Cooper TL (2012) The responsible administrator: an approach to ethics for the administrative role. 6 ed. Jossey-Bass
Dubnick MJ, Frederickson GH (2011) Public accountability: performance measurement, the extended state, and the search for trust. The Kettering Foundation, Washington DC
Dunn DD, Legge JS Jr (2001) US local government managers and the complexity of responsibility and accountability in democratic governance. J Public Adm Res Theory 11(1):73–88
Ebrahim A (2005) Accountability myopia: losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q 34(1):56–87
Forrer J, Kee JE, Newcomer KE, Boyer E (2010) Public–private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Adm Rev 70(3):475–84
Gormley WT, Balla SJ (2010) Bureaucracy and democracy: accountability and performance, 3rd edn. CQ Press, Washington, DC
Ho ATK (2006) Accounting for the value of performance measurement from the perspective of Midwestern mayors. J Public Adm Res Theory 16(2):217–37
Hwang K (2016) Accountability practices in public child welfare services. Int J Public Adm 39(8):587–596
Hwang K, Han Y (2017) Public caseworkers’ strategies coping with accountability demands. J Public Aff https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1669
Kearns KP (1994) The strategic management of accountability in nonprofit organizations: an analytical framework. Public Adm Rev 54:185–192
Koppell JGS (2005) Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”. Public Adm Rev 65(1):94–108
Mulgan R (2000). ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept? Public Adm 78(3):555–73
Raelin JA (2011) The end of managerial control? Group Org Manag 36(2):135–160
Romzek BS, Dubnick MJ (1987) Accountability in the public sector: lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Adm Rev 47:227–238
Romzek BS, Ingraham PW (2000) Cross pressures of accountability: initiative, command, and failure in the Ron Brown plane crash. Public Adm Rev 60(3):240–253
Romzek BS, LeRoux K, Blackmar JM (2012) A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Adm Rev 72(3):442–453
Schwartz R, Sulitzeanu-Kenan R (2004) Managerial values and accountability pressures: challenges of crisis and disaster. J Public Adm Res Theory 14(1):79–102
Self P (1973) Administrative theories and politics: an inquiry into the structure and processes of modern government. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Smith P (1995) On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. Int J Public Adm 18(2–3):277–310
Thompson DF (1980) Moral responsibility of public officials: the problem of many hands. Am Polit Sci Rev 74:905–916
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hwang, K. (2018). Bureaucratic Accountability and Performance. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3322-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3322-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Bureaucratic Accountability and Performance- Published:
- 23 January 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3322-2
-
Original
Bureaucratic Accountability and Performance- Published:
- 20 October 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3322-1