Abstract
The field of organizational change has chiefly been studied from a teleological perspective. Most models of change emphasize action that is rational and goal oriented. What often gets overlooked and under theorized is the continuous, iterative nature of organizational life, the unplanned and serendipitous actions by and between people that lead to new discoveries and innovation. Recent research on organizational improvisation seeks to explore this area. In this chapter we will address two questions – what is the experience of improvisation and what are the conditions that support improvisation to flourish in organizations?
In the first part of this paper, we look at the phenomenology of improvisation, the actual lived experience of those who improvise in the face of the unknown or in the midst of chaotic conditions. We will explore the strategies that some professional improvisers employ to deliberately create the improvisatory moment. We will then look at the dynamics of organizational life and explore the cultural beliefs, organizational structures, and leadership practices that support improvisation. We will draw primarily upon the model from Barrett (2012) that focuses on the how the nature of jazz improvisation and the factors that support improvisation can be transferred to leadership activities. This falls in the tradition of others who draw upon arts-based metaphors, including jazz music and theatrical improvisation, to suggest insights for leadership and ways of organizing.
Since this is a book devoted to individual transformation as well as organizational transformation, we will also touch on the topic of how improvisation is a developmental project and explore the potential for improvisation to lead to personal transformation. We will attempt to move back and forth between both themes – organizational and personal transformation. Ultimately the two topics are not separate. Any significant organizational transformation begins with an improvisation. And any meaningful improvisatory move by a person is potentially a moment of self-discovery and an identity-shaping event.
References
Arendt H (1958) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Avolio B, Walumbwa F, Weber T (2009) Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Rev Psych, 60(1), 421–449
Barrett FJ (1998) Coda – creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: implications for organizational learning. Organ Sci 9(5):605–622
Barrett FJ (2012) Yes to the mess: surprising leadership lessons from jazz, 1st edn. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston
Berliner P (1992) Thinking in jazz. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Bernstein E, Barrett F (2011) Strategic change and the jazz mindset: exploring practices that enhance dynamic capabilities for organizational improvisation. Res Organ Chang Dev 19:55–90
Brown S, Eisenhardt K (1998) Competing on the edge: strategy as structured chaos, 1st edn. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston
Buckley C (January 3, 2007) Man is rescued by stranger on subway tracks. New York Times
Burke K (1984) Permanence and change: an anatomy of purpose. University of California Press, Oakland
Carse J (1986) Finite and infinite games: a vision of life as play and possibility. Random House, New York
Charles K, Dawson P (2011) Dispersed change agency and the improvisation of strategies during processes of change. J Chang Manag 11(3):329–351
Crossan M, Lane H, White R, Klus L (1996) The improvising organization: where planning meets opportunity. Organ Dyn 24(4):20–35
Crossan M (1998) Improvisation in action. Org Science 9(5):593–599
Cunha M, Clegg S, Rego A, Neves P (2014) Organizational improvisation: from the constraint of strict tempo to the power of the avant-garde. Creat Innov Manag 23:359
Davis M, Troupe Q (1990) Miles Davis: the autobiography. Picador Books, London. Troupe, 1991:220
Denis J, Langley A, Sergi V (2012) Leadership in the plural. Acad Manag Ann 6(1):211–283
Drath W, McCauley C, Palus C, Van Velsor E, O’Connor P, McGuire J (2008) Direction, alignment, commitment: toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadersh Q 19(6):635–653
Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 44(2): 350–383
Effah J, Abbeyquaye G (2014) How FOSS replaced proprietary software at a university: an improvisation perspective in a low-income country. Afr J Inf Syst 6(1):9–25
Eisenhardt K, Tabrizi B (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Adm Sci Q 40(1):84–110
Fisher CM, Amabile TM (2009) Creativity, improvisation and organizations. In: Rickards T, Runco MA, Moger S (eds) The Routledge companion to creativity. Routledge, New York, pp 13–24
Fisher CM, Pillemer J, Amabile TM (2018) Deep help in complex project work: guiding and path-clearing across difficult terrain. Acad Manag J. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0207
Ford R (2008) Complex adaptive systems and improvisation theory: toward framing a model to enable continuous change. J Chang Manag 8(3–4):173–198
Greenleaf R (2002) Servant leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness 25th anniversary edition. Paulist Press, New York
Hadida A, Tarvainen W (2014) Organizational improvisation: a consolidating review and framework. Int J Manag Revs 17(4):437–459
Hamilton A, Konitz L (2007) Conversations on the improviser’s art. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Hazy J, Uhl-Bien M (2013) Changing the rules: the implications of complexity science for leadership research and practice. In: Day D (ed) Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Huffaker JS (2017) Me to we: how collaborative leadership culture developed in an organization. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University
Johnstone K (1987) Impro: improvisation and the theatre. Routledge
Kamoche K, Cunha M, Cunha J (2003) Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: looking beyond the jazz metaphor. J Manag Stud 40(8):2023–2051
Kellogg K, Orlikowski W, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science 17(1):22–44
Kierkegaard S (1849/1954) Fear and trembling and sickness unto death. Doubleday Anchor, New York
Larsen H (2006) Risk and “acting” into the unknown. In: Experiencing risk, spontaneity and improvisation in organizational change: working live. Routledge, Abington-on-Thames pp 46–69
Leybourne S (2009) Improvisation and agile project management: a comparative consideration. Int J Manag Proj Bus 2(4):519–535
Lichtenstein B, Plowman D (2009) The leadership of emergence: a complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. Leadersh Q 20(4):617–630
Merton RM (1940) Bureaucratic structure and personality. Soc Forces 18(4):560–568
Miner A, Bassof P, Moorman C (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: a field study. Adm Sci Q 46(2):304–337
Montouri A (2003) The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: social science, art and creativity. Human Relations 56(2):237–255
Nachmanovitch S (1990) Free play: improvisation in life and art. Penguin, London
Northouse P (2013) Leadership: theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Orlikowski W, Hofman J (1997) An improvisational model for change management: the case of groupware technologies. Sloan Manag Rev 38:11–21
Pearce C, Manz C, Sims H (2009) Where do we go from here? Is shared leadership the key to team success? Organ Dyn 38(3):234–238
Peplowski K (1998) The process of improvisation. Organization Science 9(5):560–561
Uhl-Bien M (2006) Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadersh Q 17(6):654–676
Uhl-Bien M, Ospina S (2012) Advancing relational leadership research: a dialogue among perspectives. Information Age, Greenwich
Vendelø M (2009) Improvisation and learning in organizations – an opportunity for future empirical research. Manag Learn 40(4):449–456
Vera D, Crossan M (2004) Theatrical improvisation: lessons for organizations. Organ Stud 25(5):727–749
Vera D, Crossan M (2005) Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ Sci 16(3): 203–224
Vera D, Nemanich L, Vélez-Castrillón S, Werner S (2014) Knowledge-based and contextual factors associated with R&D teams’ improvisation capability. J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314530168
Wageman R, Fisher C (2014) Who’s in charge here? The team leadership implications of authority. In: Day DV (ed) The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 455–481
Wang L, Han J, Fisher CM, Pan Y (2017) Learning to share: exploring temporality in shared leadership and team learning. Small Group Res 48(2):165–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417690027
Weick K (1998) Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ Sci 9(5):543–555
Werner K (1996) Effortless mastery: liberating the master musician within. Jamey Aebersold Jazz, Inc., New Albany
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Barrett, F.J., Huffaker, J., Fisher, C.M., Burgaud, D. (2018). Improvisation and Transformation: Yes to the Mess. In: Neal, J. (eds) Handbook of Personal and Organizational Transformation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29587-9_6-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29587-9_6-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29587-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29587-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Improvisation and Transformation: Yes to the Mess- Published:
- 08 May 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29587-9_6-2
-
Original
Improvisation and Transformation- Published:
- 21 March 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29587-9_6-1