Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Same-Sex School Bullying

  • Ann FarrellEmail author
  • Anthony A. Volk
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_855-1

Synonyms

Definition

Bullying is a behavior used to intentionally cause harm on less powerful individuals to obtain tangible, social, and reproductive resources (Volk et al. 2014). Same-sex school bullying includes intrasexual bullying, when boys bully boys and girls bully girls in order to achieve these goals. Often, same-sex bullying behaviors occur outside of the classroom setting, including school hallways, washrooms, and lunchrooms, where there may be less adult supervision (Kasen et al. 2004). Under specific school ecologies, same-sex school bullying may be more adaptive for children and adolescents.

Introduction

Same-sex school bullying may serve adaptive functions for children and adolescents. This may be why a significant proportion of youth, anywhere from 30 % to 40 %, are involved in school bullying as the perpetrator (15 %), victim (14 %), or bully-victim (i.e.,...

Keywords

Reproductive Success Adolescent Girl Parental Investment Bully Behavior Intrasexual Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51(9), 909–917.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3–4), 249–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Benenson, J. F. (2009). Dominating versus eliminating the competition: Sex differences in human intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3–4), 268–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benenson, J. F. (2013). The development of human female competition: Allies and adversaries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130079. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0079.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coyne, S. M., Archer, J., & Eslea, M. (2006). “We’re not friends anymore! Unless…”: The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 294–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). The truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian view of parental love. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dijstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2007). Same-gender and cross-gender peer acceptance and peer rejection and their relation to bullying and helping among preadolescents: Comparing predictions from gender-homophily and goal-framing approaches. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1377–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicious, V., Hawley, P. H., Jacobs, J., James, J., Volk, A. A., & Wilson, D. S. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48, 598–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis, B. J., Volk, A. A., Gonzalez, J. M., & Embry, D. D. (2015). The meaningful roles intervention: An evolutionary approach to reducing bullying and increasing prosocial behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence. doi:10.1111/jora.12243.Google Scholar
  13. Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2007). Dating violence & sexual harassment across the bully victim continuum among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(6), 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geary, D. C. (1999). Evolution and developmental sex differences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(4), 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. Toronto: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  17. Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293–299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kasen, S., Berenson, K., Cohen, P., & Johnson, J. G. (2004). The effects of school climate on changes in aggressive and other behaviors related to bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 187–210). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Leenaars, L. S., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2008). Evolutionary perspective on indirect victimization in adolescence: The role of attractiveness, dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 34(4), 404–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Owens, L., Shute, R., & Slee, P. (2000). ‘I’m in and you’re out’: Explanations for teenage girls indirect aggression. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 2(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2003). A sexual selection theory longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(3), 257–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodkin, P. C., & Berger, C. (2008). Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(6), 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. V. (2006). They’re cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15(2), 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). From peer putdowns to peer support: A theoretical model and how it translated into a national anti-bullying program. In S. Shimerson, S. Swearer, & D. Espelage (Eds.), The handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 441–454). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  31. Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 569–577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81(2), 480–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Volk, A. A., Camilleri, J. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2012). Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary adaptation? Aggressive Behavior, 38(3), 222–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34(4), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Adolescent bullying, dating, and mating: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada