Definition
Unfamiliar theories that do not fit the dominant evolutionary theories of homosexuality.
Introduction
There are a number of evolutionary hypotheses about homosexuality that do not fit either of the three main hypotheses discussed elsewhere in this encyclopedia (Kin Selection Hypothesis; Sexually Antagonistic Hypothesis; Overdominance Hypothesis). Many of these lesser-known hypotheses were initially introduced to explain the occurrence of homosexuality in nonhuman animal species, which may perhaps account for the fact that they tend to be less familiar to evolutionary psychologists. Some of these hypotheses cannot be made to bear on human homosexuality (e.g., reproductive suppression hypothesis); others could perhaps be made relevant to human homosexuality (e.g., sperm competition hypothesis); still others have in fact so been applied (e.g., dominance hierarchy hypothesis)....
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Adriaens, P. R., & De Block, A. (2006). The evolution of a social construction: The case of male homosexuality. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49, 570–585.
Adriaens, P. R., De Block, A., & Newson, L. (2012). Evolutionary theory, constructionism and male homosexuality. In F. de Sousa & G. Munevar (Eds.), Sex, reproduction and Darwinism (pp. 77–94). London: Pickering & Chatto.
Asa, C. S., & Valdespino, C. (1998). Canid reproductive biology: An integration of proximate mechanisms and ultimate causes. American Zoologist, 38, 1387–1389.
Bagemihl, B. (1999). Biological exuberance: Animal homosexuality and natural diversity. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Bartoš, L., & Holečková, J. (2006). Exciting ungulates: Male-male mounting in fallow, white-tailed and red deer. In V. Sommer & P. Vasey (Eds.), Homosexual behavior in animals: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 154–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bell, A., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (1992). Sperm competition in birds: Evolutionary causes and consequences. London: Academic.
Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (1996). Homosexuality in men and number of older brothers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(1), 27–31.
Bogaert, A. F., & Skorska, M. (2011). Sexual orientation, fraternal birth order, and the maternal immune hypothesis: A review. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 247–254.
Buller, D. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cochran, G., Ewald, P. W., & Cochran, K. D. (2000). Infection causation of disease: An evolutionary perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 43, 406–448.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Finkelhor, D. (1980). Sex among siblings: A survey on prevalence, variety, and effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 171–194.
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique on the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205(1161), 581–598.
Greenwald, E., & Leitenberg, H. (1989). Long-term effects of sexual experiences with siblings and nonsiblings during childhood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 389–399.
Hamer, D., & Copeland, P. (1994). The science of desire: The search for the gay gene and the biology of behavior. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29.
Jeffery, A. J. (2015). Two behavioral hypotheses for the evolution of male homosexuality in humans. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality (pp. 207–219). New York: Springer.
Ledgerwood, L. G., Ewald, P. W., & Cochran, G. M. (2003). Genes, germs and schizophrenia: An evolutionary perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46, 317–348.
MacIntyre, F., & Estep, K. W. (1993). Sperm competition and the persistence of genes for male homosexuality. BioSystems, 31, 223–233.
Murray, S. (2000). Homosexualities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
O’Donnell, I. (2004). Prison rape in context. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 241–255.
Poiani, A. (2010). Animal homosexuality: A biosocial perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pound, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2006). Sperm competition in humans. In T. K. Shackelford & N. Pound (Eds.), Sperm competition in humans: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 3–31). New York: Springer.
Roughgarden, J. (2009). Evolution’s rainbow: Diversity, gender and sexuality in nature and people (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Sommer, V., Schauer, P., & Kyriazis, D. (2006). A wild mixture of motivations: Same-sex mounting in Indian langur monkeys. In V. Sommer & P. Vasey (Eds.), Homosexual behaviour in animals: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 238–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stein, E. (1999). The mismeasure of desire: The science, theory, and ethics of sexual orientation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vasey, P., & Sommer, V. (2006). Homosexual behaviour in animals: Topics, hypotheses and research trajectories. In V. Sommer & P. Vasey (Eds.), Homosexual behaviour in animals: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 3–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walshe, S. (2012, March 7). The grim truth of being gay in prison. The Guardian.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Adriaens, P.R., De Block, A. (2016). Lesser-Known Theories of Homosexuality. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_55-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_55-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences