Definition
The moral debate surrounding the ethics of reproducing and responsibility for any subsequent suffering that the individual experiences.
Introduction
Responsibility for child suffering is the foundation to the anti-natalist claim that it is morally wrong to create new life. In line with anti-natalism, the ultimate responsibility for any suffering a person endures in their life is attributable to their parents, as a nonexisting person cannot consent to be born and as all individuals can be expected to experience some degree of suffering. On the other hand, pronatalists argue that holding parents responsible for all of their child’s suffering typically ignores an extensive chain of more direct and immediate possible causes of suffering rendering the ultimate responsibility with the parents as a reduction to absurdity.
Responsibility for Harm
Although it could be argued that causing a person harm withtheir consent is...
References
Benatar, D. (2006). Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Licon, J. A. (2012). The immorality of procreation. Think, 11(32), 85–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Reeve, S. (2016). Responsibility for Child Suffering. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_458-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_458-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences