Skip to main content

Biosemiotics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 51 Accesses

Definition

The term biosemiotics derives from the Greek root bios (“life”) semeion (“sign”) and suffix –ika (“study of”). Biosemiotics is thus the study of sign processing both within and between living systems.

History and Overview

The contemporary interdisciplinary research agenda of Biosemiotics has its roots in the pioneering work done by the linguist Thomas A. Sebeok (1920–2001) in bringing biologists and semioticians together to develop more fine-grained understandings about animal communication practices – and, in particular, about how those practices might underlie the evolution of human language use (Sebeok 1990, 2001).

Sebeok initially christened his interdisciplinary research project zoösemiotics – “a discipline within which the science of signs intersects with ethology, devoted to the scientific study of signalling behaviour in and across animal species” (Sebeok 1969).

However, as the number of researchers from various fields of study (including zoology, neuroscience,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, D. (2006). The evolutionary history of biosemiotics. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics: The new biological synthesis (pp. 1–67). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (2009). Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Scranton: Scranton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K. (2003). Thomas A. Sebeok and biology: Building biosemiotics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 10(1), 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K., Deacon, T., Emmeche, C., Hoffmeyer, J., & Stjernfelt, F. (2009). Theses on biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory, 4(2), 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. ([1910] 2010). The logic of signs. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary (pp. 115–148). Berlin: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (1969). Semiotics and ethology. In T. Sebeok & A. Ramsay (Eds.), Approaches to animal communication (pp. 200–231). The Hague: Mouton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (1990). Sign science and life science. In J. Deely (Ed.), Semiotics 1990 (pp. 243–252). Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (2001). Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation, and prospects. Semiotica, 134(1), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J. von. ([1940] 2010). The theory of meaning. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary (pp. 81–114). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald Favareau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Favareau, D. (2018). Biosemiotics. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3832-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3832-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics