Definition
Men and women differ in terms of their sociosexuality, or evolved preferences for whether and how soon to have sexual relations. Reflecting these differences, the sexes often come into sexual conflict.
Introduction
Sociosexual orientation, or sociosexuality, is a construct reflecting an individual’s tendency to engage in casual, uncommitted sexual relationships. It is commonly measured by the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI) (Simpson and Gangestad 1991), which measures both behavioral elements – past number of partners, predicted number of future partners, number of one-night stands, frequency of sexual fantasies – as well as attitudes toward engaging in casual, uncommitted sex. Individuals with a restricted sociosexual orientation are more likely to insist on commitment and closeness in a relationship before engaging in sex and to pursue a long-term mating strategy,...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in crosssex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.
Lenton, A. P., Bryan, A., Hastie, R., & Fischer, O. (2007). We want the same thing: Projection in judgments of sexual intent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 975–988.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 60(6), 870–883.
Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Melia, N.V., Li, N.P. (2018). Sociosexuality and Sexual Conflict in Mating Strategies. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3698-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3698-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences