Synonyms
Definition
When females are the choosy sex and retain primary control over which males they will mate with. Thus, members of the lower investment sex, usually males, compete for features than are attractive to members of the high investing sex, usually females. In this sense, females choose on the basis of male displays or traits.
Introduction
The outcome of sexual selection is the evolution of secondary sexual characteristics that are designed to attract and compete over mates. Traits that evolve via sexual selection do so as a result of competition for mates (intrasexual competition) or mate attraction (epigamic selection). Intrasexual competition is competition between members of the low investment sex (usually males) for copulations with the high investment sex (usually females). Since males are usually the low investment sex, they are the most intrasexually selected. This results in traits beneficial for competing with other males...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cordero, C., & Eberhard, W. G. (2003). Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: A critical review of some current research. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 1–6.
Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review, 7, 184–192.
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon.
Greengross, G., & Miller, G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39, 188–192.
Gwinner, H., & Schwabl, H. (2005). Evidence for sexy sons in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 58, 375–382.
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.
Houde, A. E. (1997). Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kennedy, C. E. J., Endler, J. A., Poynton, S. L., & McMinn, H. (1987). Parasite load predicts mate choice in guppies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21, 291–295.
Kluge, A. G. (1981). The life history, social organization, and parental behavior of Hyla rosenbergi Boulenger, a nest-building gladiator frog (Vol. 160, pp. 1–170). Ann Arbor: Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan.
Loyau, A., Saint Jalme, M., Cagniant, C., & Sorci, G. (2005). Multiple sexual advertisements honestly reflect health status in peacocks (Pavo cristatus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 58, 552–557.
Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. London: Random House.
Pai, A., & Yan, G. (2002). Polyandry produces sexy sons at the cost of daughters in red flour beetles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 361–368.
Petrie, M. (1994). Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature, 371, 598–599.
Pomiankowski, A., & Iwasa, Y. (1993). Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher's runaway process of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 253, 173–181.
Rodd, F. H., Hughes, K. A., Grether, G. F., & Baril, C. T. (2002). A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: Are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 475–481.
Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Josephson, S. C., Boyette, A. H., Cuthill, I. C., Fried, R. L., et al. (2014). Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 14388–14393.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2014). Darwin’s forgotten idea: The social essence of sexual selection. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 501–508.
Wyman, M. T., Mooring, M. S., McCowan, B., Penedo, M. C. T., & Hart, L. A. (2008). Amplitude of bison bellows reflects male quality, physical condition and motivation. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1625–1639.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Salmon, C. (2018). Female Choice and Sexual Conflict Theory. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3697-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3697-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences