Synonyms
Definition
A mating system in which one male mates with multiple females, or one female mates with multiple males, or both males and females have multiple mates.
Polygamy and Parental Investment
The concept of polygamy is at the heart of the study of mating system evolution. How many mates an individual has is likely to have a large effect on the reproductive contribution that individuals make to the next generation. However, there is an important difference between males and females with respect to polygamy that is related to the definitional distinction between the sexes (Trivers 1972). Females are defined by their production of large, nutrient rich gametes (eggs), whereas males are defined by the production of tiny, abundant gametes (sperm). The result of this dichotomy is that males in many species can profit reproductively from mating with multiple females. Developing ideas initially explored by Bateman (1948) and...
References
Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A., & Stahlbrandt, K. (1982). Why do pied flycatcher females mate with already mated males? Animal Behaviour, 30, 585–593.
Altmann, J., Altmann, S. A., Hausfater, G., & McCuskey, S. A. (1977). Life history of yellow baboons: physical devlopment, reproductive parameters, and infant mortality. Primates, 18, 315–330.
Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Andersson, M. (2005). Evolution of classical polyandry: three steps to emancipation. Ethology, 111, 1–23.
Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.
Beehler, B. M., & Foster, M. S. (1988). Hotshots, hot-spots, and female preferences in the organization of mating systems. American Naturalist, 131, 203–219.
Betzig, L. (2014). Eusociality in history. Human Nature, 25, 80–99.
Brown, W. D., Crespi, B. J., & Choe, J. C. (1997). Sexual conflict and the evolution of mating systems. In J. C. Choe & B. J. Crespi (Eds.), The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 236, 339–372.
Davies, N. B. (1989). Sexual conflict and the polygyny threshold. Animal Behaviour, 38, 226–234.
Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.
Gibbs, H. L., Weatherhead, P. J., Boag, P. T., et al. (1990). Realized reproductive success of polygynous red-winged blackbirds revealed by DNA markers. Science, 250, 1394–1397.
Gibson, R. M. (1996). A re-evaluation of hotspot settlement in lekking sage grouse. Animal Behaviour, 52, 993–1005.
Gordon, A. D., Green, D. J., & Richmond, B. G. (2008). Strong postcranial size dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis: results from two new resampling methods from multivariate data sets with missing data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 135, 311–328.
Hoglund, J., & Alatalo, R. V. (1995). Leks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Klug, H., Heuschele, J., Jennions, M. D., & Kokko, H. (2010). The mismeasurement of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 447–462.
Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948.
Lack, D. L. (1968). Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. London: Chapman and Hall.
Lemaitre, J. F., & Gaillard, J. M. (2013). Polygyny has no detectable mortality cost in female mammals. PLoS ONE, 8, e66670.
Orians, G. H. (1969). On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. American Naturalist, 103, 589–603.
Owens, I. P. F., & Bennett, P. M. (1997). Variation in mating systems among birds: ecological basis revealed by hierarchical comparative analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 264, 1103–1110.
Pribil, S., & Searcy, W. A. (2001). Experimental confirmation of the polygyny threshold model for red-winged blackbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1643–1646.
Queller, D. C. (1997). Why do females care more than males? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 264, 1555–1557.
Reno, P. L., Meindl, R. S., McCollum, M. A., et al. (2003). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 9404–9409.
Rice, W. R. (1996). Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature, 381, 232–234.
Slayter, R. A., Mautz, B. S., Backwell, P. R. Y., & Jennions, M. D. (2012). Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biological Reviews, 87, 1–33.
Stenmark, G., Slagsvold, T., & Lifjeld, J. T. (1988). Polygyny in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: a test of the deception hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1646–1657.
Strassmann, B. (1997). Polygyny as a risk factor for child mortality among the Dogon. Current Anthropology, 38, 688–695.
Taylor, M. L., Price, T. A. R., & Wedell, N. (2014). Polyandry in nature: a global analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 376–383.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971. Chicago: Aldine Press.
Verner, J., & Willson, M. F. (1966). The influence of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds. Ecology, 47, 143–147.
Walker, R. S., Hill, K. R., Flinn, M. V., & Ellsworth, R. M. (2012). Evolutionary history of hunter-gatherer marriage practices. PLoS ONE, 6, e19066.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Summers, K. (2017). Polygamy (Behavioral Ecology). In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3615-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3615-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences