Skip to main content

Polygamy (Behavioral Ecology)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 153 Accesses

Synonyms

Multiple mating; Polyandry; Polygynandry; Polygyny

Definition

A mating system in which one male mates with multiple females, or one female mates with multiple males, or both males and females have multiple mates.

Polygamy and Parental Investment

The concept of polygamy is at the heart of the study of mating system evolution. How many mates an individual has is likely to have a large effect on the reproductive contribution that individuals make to the next generation. However, there is an important difference between males and females with respect to polygamy that is related to the definitional distinction between the sexes (Trivers 1972). Females are defined by their production of large, nutrient rich gametes (eggs), whereas males are defined by the production of tiny, abundant gametes (sperm). The result of this dichotomy is that males in many species can profit reproductively from mating with multiple females. Developing ideas initially explored by Bateman (1948) and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A., & Stahlbrandt, K. (1982). Why do pied flycatcher females mate with already mated males? Animal Behaviour, 30, 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, J., Altmann, S. A., Hausfater, G., & McCuskey, S. A. (1977). Life history of yellow baboons: physical devlopment, reproductive parameters, and infant mortality. Primates, 18, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. (2005). Evolution of classical polyandry: three steps to emancipation. Ethology, 111, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beehler, B. M., & Foster, M. S. (1988). Hotshots, hot-spots, and female preferences in the organization of mating systems. American Naturalist, 131, 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. (2014). Eusociality in history. Human Nature, 25, 80–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. D., Crespi, B. J., & Choe, J. C. (1997). Sexual conflict and the evolution of mating systems. In J. C. Choe & B. J. Crespi (Eds.), The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 236, 339–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. (1989). Sexual conflict and the polygyny threshold. Animal Behaviour, 38, 226–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, H. L., Weatherhead, P. J., Boag, P. T., et al. (1990). Realized reproductive success of polygynous red-winged blackbirds revealed by DNA markers. Science, 250, 1394–1397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. M. (1996). A re-evaluation of hotspot settlement in lekking sage grouse. Animal Behaviour, 52, 993–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D., Green, D. J., & Richmond, B. G. (2008). Strong postcranial size dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis: results from two new resampling methods from multivariate data sets with missing data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 135, 311–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoglund, J., & Alatalo, R. V. (1995). Leks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klug, H., Heuschele, J., Jennions, M. D., & Kokko, H. (2010). The mismeasurement of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 447–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D. L. (1968). Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre, J. F., & Gaillard, J. M. (2013). Polygyny has no detectable mortality cost in female mammals. PLoS ONE, 8, e66670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G. H. (1969). On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. American Naturalist, 103, 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, I. P. F., & Bennett, P. M. (1997). Variation in mating systems among birds: ecological basis revealed by hierarchical comparative analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 264, 1103–1110.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pribil, S., & Searcy, W. A. (2001). Experimental confirmation of the polygyny threshold model for red-winged blackbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1643–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller, D. C. (1997). Why do females care more than males? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 264, 1555–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reno, P. L., Meindl, R. S., McCollum, M. A., et al. (2003). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 9404–9409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R. (1996). Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature, 381, 232–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slayter, R. A., Mautz, B. S., Backwell, P. R. Y., & Jennions, M. D. (2012). Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biological Reviews, 87, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, G., Slagsvold, T., & Lifjeld, J. T. (1988). Polygyny in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: a test of the deception hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1646–1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann, B. (1997). Polygyny as a risk factor for child mortality among the Dogon. Current Anthropology, 38, 688–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. L., Price, T. A. R., & Wedell, N. (2014). Polyandry in nature: a global analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 376–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971. Chicago: Aldine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J., & Willson, M. F. (1966). The influence of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds. Ecology, 47, 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. S., Hill, K. R., Flinn, M. V., & Ellsworth, R. M. (2012). Evolutionary history of hunter-gatherer marriage practices. PLoS ONE, 6, e19066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyle Summers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Summers, K. (2017). Polygamy (Behavioral Ecology). In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3615-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3615-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics