Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Individuals that Impose Costs

  • Daniel RedheadEmail author
  • Joey Cheng
  • Rick O’Gorman
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3572-1

Synonyms

Definition

In humans, individuals that impose costs are those who signal both an ability and a willingness to inflict harm upon others.

Introduction

Traits that successfully signal an ability and willingness to impose costs comprise a dominance profile. Attaining social rank through dominance is reliant on an individual’s propensity to induce fear of psychological, material, and physical costs that the individual may impose upon their conspecifics (Buss and Duntley 2006; Chance 1967). Dominance has a deep phylogenetic legacy and likely persisted due to the prevalence of intergroup conflict throughout human prehistory that created a selection pressure for both physical and behavioral formidability (Manson and Wrangham 1991; Wrangham and Peterson 1996).

Physical Formidability, Resource Control, and the Ability to Impose Costs

Given the importance of discerning who is most able to inflict harm upon others, it seems that humans have...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, C., & Willer, R. (2014). Do status hierarchies benefit groups? A bounded functionalist account of status. In The psychology of social status (pp. 47–70). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Apicella, C. L. (2014). Upper-body strength predicts hunting reputation and reproductive success in Hadza hunter–gatherers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(6), 508–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (1988). The behavioural biology of aggression. New York: CUP Archive.Google Scholar
  4. Ashton-James, C. E., & Tracy, J. L. (2012). Pride and prejudice: How feelings about the self-influence judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(4), 466–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaker, N. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). The status-size hypothesis: How cues of physical size and social status influence each other. In The psychology of social status (pp. 119–137). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Blaker, N. M., Rompa, I., Dessing, I. H., Vriend, A. F., Herschberg, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2013). The height leadership advantage in men and women: Testing evolutionary psychology predictions about the perceptions of tall leaders. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boehm, C. (2009). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruckert, L., Liénard, J.-S., Lacroix, A., Kreutzer, M., & Leboucher, G. (2006). Women use voice parameters to assess men’s characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273(1582), 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2006). The evolution of aggression. In Evolution and social psychology (pp. 263–286). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carré, J. M., Putnam, S. K., & McCormick, C. M. (2009). Testosterone responses to competition predict future aggressive behaviour at a cost to reward in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(4), 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chance, M. R. A. (1967). Attention structure as the basis of primate rank orders. Man, 2(4), 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Ho, S., & Henrich, J. (2016). Listen, follow me: Dynamic vocal signals of dominance predict emergent social rank in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (in prep). Dominance and prestige: Debates, misunderstandings, and new evidence.Google Scholar
  17. Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature, 462(7269), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (2017). Human ethology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69(3), 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25(3), 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallup, A. C., White, D. D., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2007). Handgrip strength predicts sexual behavior, body morphology, and aggression in male college students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gavrilets, S. (2012). On the evolutionary origins of the egalitarian syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(35), 14069–14074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gintis, H., van Schaik, C., & Boehm, C. (2015). Zoon politikon: The evolutionary origins of human political systems. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Gutierrez, M. (2006). How long does it take to become a proficient hunter? Implications for the evolution of extended development and long life span. Journal of Human Evolution, 51(5), 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halevy, N., Bornstein, G., & Sagiv, L. (2008). “In-group love” and “out-group hate” as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: A new game paradigm. Psychological Science, 19(4), 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammerstein, P., & Parker, G. A. (1982). The asymmetric war of attrition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 96(4), 647–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haselhuhn, M. P., Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2015). Men’s facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 10(4), e0122637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henrich, J. (2016). The secret of our success: How learning from others drove human evolution, domesticated our species, and made us smart. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, N. B., & Marlowe, F. W. (2002). Selection for delayed maturity. Human Nature, 13(2), 199–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaplan, H., Lancaster, J., & Robson, A. (2003). Embodied capital and the evolutionary economics of the human life span. Population and Development Review, 29, 152–182.Google Scholar
  35. Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., & Segall, M. H. (1981). A cross-cultural exploration of physiognomic traits of dominance and happiness. Ethology and Sociobiology, 2(1), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Peters, S. (2012). Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences,  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Konečná, M., & Urlacher, S. S. (2017). Male social status and its predictors among Garisakang forager-horticulturalists of lowland Papua New Guinea. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(6), 789–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kruger, D. J., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2011). Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Little, A. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2012). Evolution, appearance, and occupational success. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(5), 147470491201000503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Anderson, C., & Roney, J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Manson, J. H., & Wrangham, R. W. (1991). Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and humans. Current Anthropology, 32(4), 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64(2), 377–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 214–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Gorman, R., Henrich, J., & Vugt, M. V. (2009). Constraining free riding in public goods games: Designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1655), 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pandit, S. A., & van Schaik, C. (2003). A model for leveling coalitions among primate males: Toward a theory of egalitarianism. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55(2), 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2003). A sexual selection theory longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(3), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Sell, A., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). The ancestral logic of politics: Upper-body strength regulates men’s assertion of self-interest over economic redistribution. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1098–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pierce, B. D., & White, R. E. (2006). Resource context contestability and emergent social structure: An empirical investigation of an evolutionary theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(2), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Price, M. E., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). The evolution of leader–follower reciprocity: The theory of service-for-prestige. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 363.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Price, M. E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2002). Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Redhead, D. (2016). Social hierarchy & social networks: The effects of prestige and dominance within a developmental context. Masters, Durham University.Google Scholar
  53. Reynolds, T., Baumeister, R. F., & Maner, J. K. (2018). Competitive reputation manipulation: Women strategically transmit social information about romantic rivals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ronay, R., Greenaway, K., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psychological Science, 23(6), 669–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stirrat, M., Stulp, G., & Pollet, T. V. (2012). Male facial width is associated with death by contact violence: Narrow-faced males are more likely to die from contact violence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(5), 551–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tracy, J. L., Cheng, J. T., Robins, R. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2009). Authentic and hubristic pride: The affective core of self-esteem and narcissism. Self and Identity, 8(2–3), 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. von Rueden, C., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2016). Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10824–10829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Stieglitz, J. (2014). Leadership in an egalitarian society. Human Nature, 25(4), 538–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson, M. L., Hauser, M. D., & Wrangham, R. W. (2001). Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Animal Behaviour, 61(6), 1203–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wrangham, R. W., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of human behavior, ecology and cultureMax Planck institute for evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of EssexColchesterUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kevin Kniffin
    • 1
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA