Individuals that Impose Costs
In humans, individuals that impose costs are those who signal both an ability and a willingness to inflict harm upon others.
Traits that successfully signal an ability and willingness to impose costs comprise a dominance profile. Attaining social rank through dominance is reliant on an individual’s propensity to induce fear of psychological, material, and physical costs that the individual may impose upon their conspecifics (Buss and Duntley 2006; Chance 1967). Dominance has a deep phylogenetic legacy and likely persisted due to the prevalence of intergroup conflict throughout human prehistory that created a selection pressure for both physical and behavioral formidability (Manson and Wrangham 1991; Wrangham and Peterson 1996).
Physical Formidability, Resource Control, and the Ability to Impose Costs
Given the importance of discerning who is most able to inflict harm upon others, it seems that humans have...
- Anderson, C., & Willer, R. (2014). Do status hierarchies benefit groups? A bounded functionalist account of status. In The psychology of social status (pp. 47–70). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Archer, J. (1988). The behavioural biology of aggression. New York: CUP Archive.Google Scholar
- Blaker, N. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). The status-size hypothesis: How cues of physical size and social status influence each other. In The psychology of social status (pp. 119–137). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Blaker, N. M., Rompa, I., Dessing, I. H., Vriend, A. F., Herschberg, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2013). The height leadership advantage in men and women: Testing evolutionary psychology predictions about the perceptions of tall leaders. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boehm, C. (2009). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2006). The evolution of aggression. In Evolution and social psychology (pp. 263–286). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (in prep). Dominance and prestige: Debates, misunderstandings, and new evidence.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, H., Lancaster, J., & Robson, A. (2003). Embodied capital and the evolutionary economics of the human life span. Population and Development Review, 29, 152–182.Google Scholar
- Pierce, B. D., & White, R. E. (2006). Resource context contestability and emergent social structure: An empirical investigation of an evolutionary theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(2), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Redhead, D. (2016). Social hierarchy & social networks: The effects of prestige and dominance within a developmental context. Masters, Durham University.Google Scholar
- Wrangham, R. W., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar