Semiotic constraints refer to the notion that the behavior of animals (including humans) is organized at least in part by what the things that they encounter in the world signify, or “mean,” to them. In the context of evolutionary psychology, such “meanings” do not refer to self-conscious mental processes but to naturally evolved patterns of behavior wherein a given stimulus has come to indicate, or point to, something other than itself for the members of a species. The term “semiotic constraints” has thus been used to refer both to those signs in the environment that productively constrain, and thus give shape to, an organism’s behavior, as well as to the conditions under which such stimuli have become meaningful for an organism to begin with.
“Semiosis” comes from the Greek terms sêma “sign” and -ōsis(“process”). Biosemiotics is thus the study of sign-processes in living systems, and “semiotic constraints,” in this context, refer to the evolutionary and...
- Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259–264). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Deacon, T. (2011). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Pattee, H. (1972). Laws and constraints, symbols and languages. In C. H. Waddington (Ed.), Towards a theoretical biology (Vol. 4, pp. 248–258). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Pattee, H. (1997). The physics of symbols and the evolution of semiotic controls. In M. Coombs & M. Sulcoski (Eds.), Control mechanisms for complex systems: Issues of measurement and semiotic analysis (pp. 9–25). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
- Steels, L. (2004). The evolution of communication systems by adaptive agents. In E. Alonso, D. Kudenko, & D. Kazakov (Eds.), Adaptive agents and multi-agent systems (pp. 125–140). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar