Skip to main content

Linguistic Evolution

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 108 Accesses

Synonyms

Evolution of language; Language evolution; Language origins and evolution

Definition

The multidisciplinary study of linguistic evolution has two overarching goals. The first one is to understand the origins of language in humans; in order to do this, anthropologists, archaeologists, geneticists, and linguists examine the biological, cognitive, and technological evolution of our species. Additionally, comparative psychologists and biologists also gain knowledge by identifying similarities and differences between the communicative behavior of humans and other animal species. The second goal of evolutionary linguists is to learn about the origins of linguistic structure in human languages. Linguists and psychologists aim at explaining the distribution of linguistic elements and properties as the result of social and cultural evolutionary processes.

Introduction

The term language evolution, or linguistic evolution, is used in two distinct, although related, ways. First, it may...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arbib, M. A. (2012). How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Oxford: Carnegie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayub, Q., Yngvadottir, B., Chenn, Y., Xue, Y., Hu, M., Vernes, S. C., Fisher, S. E., & Tyler-Smith, C. (2013). FOXP2 targets show evidence of positive selection in European populations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 92(5), 696–706. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.03.019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and human behaviour. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, R., Lemey, P., Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Drummond, A. J., Gray, R. D., Suchard, M. A., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2012). Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science, 337(6097), 957–960. doi:10.1126/science.1219669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Corballis, M. C. (2002). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dediu, D., & Ladd, D. R. (2007). Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and microcephalin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(26), 10944–10949. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610848104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dediu, D., & Levinson, S. C. (2013). On the antiquity of language: The reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 00397. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dor, D., & Jablonka, J. (2014). Why we need to move from gene–culture co-evolution to culturally driven co-evolution. In D. Dor, C. Knight, & J. Lewis (Eds.), Social origins of language (pp. 14–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, S., Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2015). Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure. Cognition, 141, 87–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (2007). The evolution of human speech: Its anatomical and neural bases. Current Anthropology, 48(1), 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2010). Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE, 5(1), e8559. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (2012). How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meir, I., Sandler, W., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M. (2010). Emerging sign languages. In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education (Vol. 2, pp. 267–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M. (2009). Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 405–415.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritt, N. (2004). Selfish sounds: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (2001). Children creating language: How Nicaraguan sign language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12(4), 323–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. J. B., Clements, F. A., & Goodfellow, D. J. (1984). Local and regional variations in chaffinch song and the question of dialects. Behaviour, 88, 76–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2006). The protolanguage debate: Bridging the gap? In A. Cangelosi, A. D. M. Smith, & K. Smith (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 6th international conference (pp. 315–322). Singapore: World Scientific Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, D., & Chaminade, T. (2012). Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 367(1585), 75–87.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., McGuigan, N., Marshall-Percini, L. S., & Hopper, L. M. (2009). Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364, 2417–2428. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0069.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. (2009). Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, A. (2002). Dual processing in protolanguage: Performance without competence. In A. Wray (Ed.), The transition to language, Oxford studies in the evolution of language (pp. 113–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberbühler, K. (2015). Linguistic capacity of non-human animals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(3), 313–321. doi:10.1002/wcs.1338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Tamariz, M. (2016). Linguistic Evolution. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3350-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3350-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics