Skip to main content

Confounding Use of Tools on Physical Tasks

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 33 Accesses

Synonyms

Causal cognition, Tool-use tasks, Trap tasks

Definition

Task manipulations that affect subjects’ tool-use performance.

Introduction

Tool use is a widespread behavior among human and nonhuman animals (see Shumaker et al. 2011 for a review) and understanding which cognitive mechanisms underlie this remarkable behavior has been the subject of an important amount research in the past decades (e.g., Sanz et al. 2013 for a review). Tool-use tasks that require subjects to overcome obstacles to get a reward have been important paradigms devoted to investigate causal knowledge in primates and birds (e.g., Call 2013). In this context, trap tasks – particularly, trap tube tasks – have been used extensively in recent years. Generally these tasks involve presenting subjects with a stick, a clear tube with a trap on its bottom part and a reward placed inside the tube next to the trap and outside of the subject’s direct reach. Subjects have to use the stick to get the reward out of the tube...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Call, J. (2013). Three ingredients for becoming a creative tool-user. In C. Sanz, C. Boesch & J. Call (Eds.), Tool use in animals (pp. 3–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragaszy, D. M., & Cummins-Sebree, S. E. (2005). Relational spatial reasoning by a nonhuman: The example of capuchin monkeys. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4, 282–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, N. J., & Call, J. (2006). How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task. Animal Cognition, 9, 193–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D. J. (2000). Folk physics for apes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D. J., Reaux, J. E., & Frey, S. H. (2010). Chimpanzees’ context-dependent tool use provides evidence for separable representations of hand and tool even during active use within peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 48, 243–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, C., Call, J., & Boesch, C. (2013). Tool use in animals: Cognition and ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seed, A. M., Tebbich, S., Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2006). Investigating physical cognition in rooks, Corvus frugilegus. Current Biology, 16, 697–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seed, A. M., Call, J., Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2009). Chimpanzees solve the trap problem when the confound of tool-use is removed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 23–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shumaker, R. W., Walkup, K. R., & Beck, B. B. (2011). Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tool by animals. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visalberghi, E., & Limongelli, L. (1994). Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Völter, C. J., & Call, J. (2014). The cognitive underpinnings of flexible tool use in great apes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gema Martin-Ordas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Martin-Ordas, G. (2016). Confounding Use of Tools on Physical Tasks. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3178-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3178-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics