Skip to main content

False-Belief Test, The

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 1047 Accesses

Synonyms

The Sally-Anne test

Definition

An influential experimental paradigm designed to assess whether an individual possesses a theory of mind, based on his or her ability (or lack thereof) to attribute false beliefs to others.

Introduction

Since the late 1970s and early 1980s, the false-belief test has played pivotal roles in both developmental psychology and comparative psychology. In both fields, it has long functioned as a litmus test for assessing the presence and development of a theory of mind in human infants and great apes.

In developmental psychology, the standard method for conducting this test is widely referred to as the Sally-Anne test. Experimental data has been largely consistent insofar as the majority of children under the age of four – along with most autistic children (Baron-Cohen et al. 1985) – fail this test, while children between the ages of four and five reliably pass it (Gopnik and Astington 1988). As a result, it has long been the opinion of psychologists...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, K. (2015). The animal mind. New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon, R., Scott, R., & He, Z. (2010). False belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 110–118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77(1), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59(1), 26–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (1978). Studying the chimpanzee’s theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 576–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krachun, K., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2010). A new change-of-contents false belief test: Children and chimpanzees compared. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15 month old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255–258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (2007). Evaluating the theory-of-mind hypothesis of autism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam See .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

See, A. (2016). False-Belief Test, The. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3120-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3120-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics