Skip to main content

Psychology of Reciprocal Altruism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Reciprocity

Definition

Different forms of reciprocal altruism – taking turns offering altruistic help – require different psychological building blocks.

Introduction

A pair of pied flycatchers busily snatch insects to bring back to their nest and feed to their young. Suddenly, an owl appears close to the nest, posing a serious predation threat to their offspring. The pair fly straight to the owl, shrieking and dive bombing it to chase it away. A nearby pair of flycatchers detects the ruckus and also arrives to attack the predator. Another nearby pair, however, fails to help. An hour later, two owls appear, one at each of the neighboring nests. What should the original pair do? Krams et al. (2008) conducted this experiment and found that, out of 32 pairs of flycatchers, 2 stayed at the nest, 30 attacked the owl near the pair who helped them previously, and none attacked the owl near the pair who did not help them before. This willingness to pay a cost to cooperate or help...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aktipis, C. A. (2006). Recognition memory and the evolution of cooperation: How simple strategies succeed in an agent-based world. Adaptive Behavior, 14(3), 239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390–1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P. (2008). Enhanced recognition of defectors depends on their rarity. Cognition, 107(3), 817–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S., Dickhaut, J., Hecht, G., Towry, K., & Waymire, G. (2009). Recordkeeping alters economic history by promoting reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 106(4), 1009–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2012). How adaptive is memory for cheaters? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(6), 403–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen, S. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1995). Responses to quantity: Perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21(1), 82–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Human Nature, 13(1), 129–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture: II. Case study: A computational theory of social exchange. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10(1–3), 51–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M., & Luttrell, L. M. (1988). Mechanisms of social reciprocity in three primate species: Symmetrical relationship characteristics or cognition? Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Cooperation among animals: An evolutionary perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D. M. T., & Haley, K. J. (2003). The strategy of affect: Emotions in human cooperation. In P. Hammerstein (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation, Dahlem Workshop Report (pp. 7–36). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, E. E., & Opfer, J. E. (2009). Cognitive constraints on how economic rewards affect cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 11–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I, II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. C., & Madden, G. J. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychological Record, 52(4), 429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. Y. (2015). Time discounting and time preference in animals: A critical review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krams, I., Krama, T., Igaune, K., & Mänd, R. (2008). Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(4), 599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kugler, K., & Jones, W. H. (1992). On conceptualizing and assessing guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 318–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, H. J., Damerow, P., & Englund, R. K. (1993). Archaic bookkeeping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194(4), 561–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, T., Rutte, C., Killingback, T., Taborsky, M., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2005). Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 272(1568), 1115–1120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schino, G., & Aureli, F. (2010). Primate reciprocity and its cognitive requirements. Evolutionary Anthropology, 19(4), 130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1984). Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308(5959), 541–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Betrayal in mateships, friendships, and coalitions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1151–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifferman, E. (2009). Its own reward: Lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm. Animal Cognition, 12(4), 547–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 104(44), 17435–17440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W., McLinn, C. M., & Stevens, J. R. (2002). Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Science, 298(5601), 2216–2218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. R., Volstorf, J., Schooler, L. J., & Rieskamp, J. (2011). Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, E. A., & Dale, J. (2007). Individual recognition: It is good to be different. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22(10), 529–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. Stevens or Juan F. Duque .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stevens, J.R., Duque, J.F. (2016). Psychology of Reciprocal Altruism. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3051-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3051-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics