Skip to main content

Selection Pressures as a Function of Age

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 39 Accesses

Synonyms

Hamilton’s forces; Scaling factors

Definition

The strength of natural selection on mortality and fecundity varies across ages.

Introduction

The insight that natural selection should be weaker with age was originally proposed by Ronald A. Fisher (1930) in A Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. In this groundbreaking book, Fisher fused Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection with Gregor Mendel’s theory of particulate inheritance – a fundamental insight in the modern synthesis in biology. Fisher, however, did not fully explore how the force of selection differs across ages. That exploration would have to wait for decades, when biological theorists (Medawar 1952; Williams 1957) realized that weakening in the force of selection with age could explain how evolution not only could – but should – result in aging: the decrease of fecundity or increase in mortality with age. Soon thereafter, William D. Hamilton (1966) provided theoretical clarity on the issue by explaining...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Charlesworth, D. (1980). Evolution in age structured populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., pp. 88–114). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930). A genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1941). New paths in genetics. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior, I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1966). The moulding of senescence by natural selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 12, 12–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdenperä, M., Lummaa, V., Helle, S., Tremblay, M., & Russell, A. F. (2004). Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women. Nature, 428, 178–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medawar, P. B. (1952). An unsolved problem of biology. London: H. K. Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. R., Rauser, C. L., Benford, G., Matos, M., & Mueller, L. D. (2007). Hamilton’s forces of natural selection after forty years. Evolution, 61, 1265–1276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1957). Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution, 11, 398–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan L. Koenig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Koenig, B.L. (2016). Selection Pressures as a Function of Age. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3016-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3016-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics