Skip to main content

Partner Desertion

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 60 Accesses

Synonyms

Mate desertion

Definition

Partner desertion occurs when one member of a mated pair absconds, leaving the remaining partner to care for any offspring alone.

Introduction

In systems with biparental care, parents are caught in a cooperative dilemma. Each partner could potentially benefit by deserting its mate and their young to begin a new breeding attempt with a different partner or to conserve energy for future reproduction, if the deserted partner rears the young alone. However, the costs of desertion can outweigh potential benefits if a deserted partner is incapable of raising young successfully alone, is itself likely to desert the young, or is selected to incompletely compensate for the loss of the partner’s care (Trivers 1972; Dawkins 1976; Lazarus 1990). A variety of factors can influence whether a breeding individual gains fitness benefits from deserting its mate, and many questions remain about how these factors interact as well as which are most important in driving...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alonzo, S. H. (2012). Sexual selection favours male parental care, when females can choose. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 1784–1790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barta, Z., Székely, T., Liker, A., & Harrison, F. (2014). Social role specialization promotes cooperation between parents. The American Naturalist, 183, 747–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A., & Sibly, R. (1978). A model of mate desertion. Animal Behaviour, 26, 645–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griggio, M., & Pilastro, A. (2007). Sexual conflict over parental care in a species with female and male brood desertion. Animal Behaviour, 74, 779–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härdling, R., Kokko, H., & Arnold, K. E. (2003). Dynamics of the caring family. The American Naturalist, 161, 395–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R. A. (2011). Load lightening and negotiation over offspring care in cooperative breeders. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., & Johnstone, R. A. (2002). Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 357, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpimäki, E., Salo, P., & Valkama, J. (2011). Sequential polyandry by brood desertion increases female fitness in a bird with obligatory bi-parental care. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 1093–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, J. (1990). The logic of mate desertion. Animal Behaviour, 39, 672–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, E. S., Stutchbury, B. J. M., & Chiver, I. (2010). Parental conflict and brood desertion by females in blue-headed vireos. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 947–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller, D. C. (1997). Why do females care more than males? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 264, 1555–1557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. L., Russell, A. F., & Johnstone, R. A. (2013). Intra-group relatedness affects parental and helper investment rules in offspring care. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 1855–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szentirmai, I., Székeley, T., & Komdeur, J. (2007). Sexual conflict over care: Antagonistic effects of clutch desertion on reproductive success of male and female penduline tits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 1739–1744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tindle, R. (1984). The evolution of breeding strategies in the flightless cormorant (Nannopterum harrisi) of the Galapagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 21, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiktander, U., Olsson, O., & Nilsson, S. G. (2000). Parental care and social mating system in the lesser Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos minor. Journal of Avian Biology, 31, 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlin A. Stern .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stern, C.A. (2017). Partner Desertion. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2726-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2726-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics