Definition
An evolutionary theory of leader-follower relations that aims to explain why these relations can range from being “bad” (i.e., based on coercion) to “good” (i.e., based on mutually beneficial exchange).
Introduction
The service-for-prestige theory (Price and Van Vugt 2014, 2015) takes an evolutionary perspective on leader-follower relations in order to accomplish two main aims. The first aim is to explain why these relations can range from being “bad” and coercive (i.e., based on a leader’s ability to harm followers) to “good” and voluntary (i.e., based on a leader’s ability to benefit followers). The second aim is to propose that “good” leadership is governed by the logic of reciprocity, whereby leaders deliver public goods to followers in exchange for elevated social prestige. Both of these aspects of leader-follower relations are examined in more detail below.
What Are the Characteristics of “Bad” Versus “Good” Leadership, and Why Does Leadership Quality Vary So Widely?
Pe...
References
Bird, D. W., & Bliege Bird, R. (2010). Competing to be leaderless: Food sharing and magnanimity among Martu Aborigines. In J. Kanter, K. Vahn, & J. Earkins (Eds.), The evolution of leadership: Transitions in decision making from small-scale to middle-range societies (pp. 21–49). Santa Fe: SAR Press.
Chagnon, N. A. (1979). Is reproductive success equal in egalitarian societies? In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 374–401). North Scituate: Duxbury Press.
Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239, 985–992.
Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., & GLOBE Associates. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadership Quarterly, 10, 219–256.
Ellis, B. J. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267–288). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gurven, M., Allen-Arave, W., Hill, K., & Hurtado, M. (2000). “It’s a wonderful life”: Signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(4), 263–282.
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred status as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.
Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9, 169–180.
Jacobs, B. (2016). Trump campaign dogged by violent incidents at rallies. The Guardian, 11 Mar 2016. Downloaded 12 May 2016 from http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/11/donald-trump-campaign-claims-violence-rallies
Kelly, R. L. (1995). The foraging spectrum: Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.
King, A., Johnson, D. D. P., & Van Vugt, M. (2009). The origins and evolution of leadership. Current Biology, 19, R911–R916.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Price, M. E. (2003). Pro-community altruism and social status in a Shuar village. Human Nature, 14, 191–208.
Price, M. E., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). The evolution of leader-follower reciprocity: The theory of service-for-prestige. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 363.
Price, M. E., & Van Vugt, M. (2015). The service-for-prestige theory of leader-follower relations: A review of the evolutionary psychology and anthropology literatures. In R. D. Arvey & S. M. Colarelli (Eds.), Biological foundations of organizational behaviour (pp. 169–201). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Price, M. E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2002). Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 203–231.
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Price, M. E. (2006). Cognitive adaptations for n-person exchange: The evolutionary roots of organizational behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 103–129.
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.
Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2008). The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 402–415.
Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2223–2232.
Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Stieglitz, J. (2014). Leadership in an egalitarian society. Human Nature, 25(4), 538–566.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Price, M.E. (2016). Service-for-Prestige Theory of Leader-Follower Relations. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2555-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2555-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences