Synonyms
Definition
A dyadic relationship comprises two individuals who are more or less interdependent and who need one another to facilitate their survival and reproductive goals. Groups comprise three or more similarly interdependent individuals who may or may not be related, and who cooperate with one another to achieve common goals. Both dyads and groups may experience conflict when self-interest trumps mutual benefit. Groups also compete with each other for control of resources.
Introduction
From the moment of birth, humans have been crafted by evolution to desire relationships with those who are best placed to meet their needs, and to find happiness and security in the company of those who value and care about them. Further, and in the interests of successful reproduction, humans possess powerful motivations to establish committed pair-bond relationships that facilitate the survival of offspring. From an evolutionary perspective, then, humans...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Barclay, P. (2016). Biological markets and effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 33–38.
Berscheid, E. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1–25.
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 193–281). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Buss, D. M. (2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 155–160.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Clark, M., Fitness, J., & Brissette, I. (2001). Understanding people’s perceptions of their relationships is crucial to understanding their emotional lives. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. Clark (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Vol. 2: Interpersonal processes (pp. 253–278). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Cottrell, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to prejudice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 88, 770–789.
Ellis, B., & Malamuth, N. (2000). Love and anger in romantic relationships: A discrete systems model. Journal of Personality, 68, 526–558.
Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Fitness, J. (2001). Betrayal, rejection, revenge and forgiveness: An interpersonal script approach. In M. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 73–103). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fitness, J. (2005). Bye bye, black sheep: The causes and consequences of rejection in family relationships. In K. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection and bullying (pp. 263–276). New York: Psychology Press.
Fitness, J. (2015). Emotions in close relationships. In J. Simpson (Ed.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2: Interpersonal relations and group processes. Washington, DC: APA Books.
Fitness, J., & Peterson, J. (2008). Punishment and forgiveness in close relationships: An evolutionary, social-psychological perspective. In J. P. Forgas & J. Fitness (Eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 255–270). New York: Psychology Press.
Fitness, J., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Overall, N. (2003). Attraction and intimate relationships. In M. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social psychology (pp. 258–278). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 20–36.
Gillath, O., Karantzas, G., & Fraley, C. R. (2016). Adult attachment: A concise introduction to theory and research. London: Academic.
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351–374.
Gottman, J. M., & Driver, J. L. (2005). Dysfunctional marital conflict and everyday marital interaction. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 43, 63–78.
Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 3–23.
Karaçanta, A., & Fitness, J. (2006). Majority support for minority outgroups: The roles of compassion and guilt. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2730–2749.
Kurland, J. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2005). Cooperation and conflict among kin. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 447–482). Hoboken: Wiley.
Kurzban, R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Managing ingroup and outgroup relationships. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 653–675). Hoboken: Wiley.
Langlois, J., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.
Sear, R. (2016). Beyond the nuclear family: An evolutionary perspective. Current Opinions in Psychology, 7, 98–103.
Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Betrayal in mateships, friendships, and coalitions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1151–1164.
Sprecher, S. (2018). Inequity leads to distress and a reduction in satisfaction: Evidence from a priming experiment. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 230–244.
Van Vugt, M., & Schaller, M. (2008). Evolutionary approaches to group dynamics: An introduction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 1–6.
Vigil, J. M. (2007). Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature, 18, 143–161.
Williams, K., Forgas, J. P., & von Hippel, W. (Eds.). (2005). The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection and bullying. New York: Psychology Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Fitness, J., Case, T.I. (2018). Dyadic Relationships Versus Group Processes. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2444-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2444-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences