Synonyms
Definition
Use by a male of force, or threat of force, that functions to increase the chances that a female will mate with him at a time when she is likely to be fertile and to decrease the chances that she will mate with other males, at some cost to the female (Smuts and Smuts 1993, pp. 2–3).
Introduction
Sexual selection theory traces its origin to The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, in which Charles Darwin theorized about the evolution of traits involved in reproduction (Darwin 1871). Darwin described two processes: the competition among one sex for sexual access to the other and the expression of choice by one sex for traits expressed in the other. Barbara and Robert Smuts proposed that intersexual coercion be considered as a third mechanism of sexual selection, arguing that there is abundant evidence that males use aggression against females to influence their reproductive success (Smuts and Smuts 1993). Sexual...
References
Camilleri, J. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2012). Sexual conflict and partner rape. In T. Shackelford & A. Goetz (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sexual conflict in humans (pp. 257–268). New York: Oxford University Press.
Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J., & Rowe, L. (2003). Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(1), 41–47.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1345–1365.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
Muller, M. N., Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2009). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in primates. In M. N. Muller & R. W. Wrangham (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primates and humans: An evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smuts, B. B. (1992). Male aggression against women: An evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 3(1), 1–44.
Smuts, B. B., & Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: Evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22, 1–63.
Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
van Schaik, C. P., & Janson, C. H. (2000). Infanticide by males and its implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watson-Capps, J. J. (2009). Evolution of sexual coercion with respect to sexual selection and sexual conflict theory. In M. N. Muller & R. W. Wrangham (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primate and humans: Evolutionary perspectives on male aggression against females (pp. 23–41). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1995). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 289–322). New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Emery Thompson, M. (2018). Sexual Coercion as a Mechanism of Sexual Selection. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2077-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2077-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences