Skip to main content

Self-Reports

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Interview; Questionnaire; Self-reported data; Survey

Definition

Self-reports are data that are sourced from written or verbal representation of individuals’ cognitions, emotions, attitudes, experiences, behavioral intentions, and/or beliefs about the self.

Introduction

Self-reports have been widely used in evolutionary psychology research targeting many domains (e.g., mate preference, tactics of deception, cooperation, and helping). While researchers using self-reports have been able to collect and examine data that would otherwise be unobtainable (e.g., sexual fantasies), the use of self-reports in evolutionary psychology has been challenged and criticized (see Shields and Steinke 2003). Although there are valid criticisms of the self-report method, such as the potential for respondents to provide deceptive answers or to have their answers be influenced by social desirability concerns, there is strong evidence to support the use of self-reports as a valid methodological tool...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press: Long Grove, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(5), 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and brain sciences, 12(01), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Psychology Press: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(2), 346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological science, 3(4), 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(5), 770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of consulting psychology, 24(4), 349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. (2005). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. The handbook of evolutionary psychology, 676–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of comparative psychology, 108(3), 233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. R. (2003). A review of sex differences in sexual jealousy, including self-report data, psychophysiological responses, interpersonal violence, and morbid jealousy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(2), 102–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (1996). An evolutionary perspective on physical attractiveness. Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews, 5(3), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(01), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, E. J., Shackelford, T. K., & Starratt, V. G. (2009a). Mate value of romantic partners predicts men’s partner-directed verbal insults. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009b). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 214–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Balanced inventory of desirable responding (BIDR). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Measures Package, 1, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P. C., & Dreyer, C. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Young adults’ motives for engaging in casual sex. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. E., & Sudman, S. E. (1996). Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. Jossey-Bass (purchased by John Wiley & Sons in 1999): Hoboken, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. American psychologist, 54(2), 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. A., & Steinke, P. (2003). Does self-report make sense as an investigative method in evolutionary psychology. Evolution, gender, and rape, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvers, S. (2011). Methodological and Moral Muddles in Evolutionary Psychology. Homo Oeconomicus, 28(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Campbell, L. (2005). Methods of evolutionary sciences. In The handbook of evolutionary psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: Hoboken, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(2), 293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tooke, W., & Camire, L. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(5), 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, F., Dukes, A., Tybur, J. M., & Park, J. H. (2016). Disgust sensitivity relates to moral foundations independent of political ideology. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000075

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda L Martens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Martens, A.L., Miller, S.S., Saucier, D.A. (2016). Self-Reports. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1847-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1847-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics