Skip to main content

Perceptions of Infidelity Cues

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Assessing faithfulness; Detecting romantic cheating

Definition

The assessment of visual or auditory information in relation to a potential mate’s future likelihood of sexual unfaithfulness.

Introduction

Both men and women are vulnerable to the fitness risks of selecting an unfaithful long-term mate. Owing to this selection pressure, individuals who perceive and attend to infidelity cues during mate search may be better able to avoid the potential fitness costs of cuckoldry from unfaithful female mates, or reduced investment and protection from unfaithful male mates. Cues to infidelity stem from hormonally dependent traits, such as the degree of facial and vocal sexual dimorphism (male masculinity, female femininity). These cues contribute to perceptions of infidelity independently of their attractiveness and also have implications for mate selection.

Male Masculinity

Research suggests that women use markers of underlying testosterone to assess the risk of male infidelity....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Booth, A., & Dabbs, J. M. (1993). Testosterone and men’s marriages. Social Forces, 72, 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durante, K. M., & Li, N. P. (2009). Oestradiol level and opportunistic mating in women. Biology Letters, 5, 179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, D. R. (2008). Are human faces and voices ornaments signaling common underlying cues to mate value? Evolutionary Anthropology, 17, 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behaviour: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, D. J. (2006). Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Relationships, 13, 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. J. M., Re, D. E., & Feinberg, D. R. (2011). Voice pitch influences perceptions of sexual infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 64–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. J. M., Pisanski, K., Tigue, C. C., Fraccaro, P. J., & Feinberg, D. R. (2014). Perceptions of infidelity risk predict women’s preferences for low male voice pitch in short-term over long-term relationship contexts. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Morley, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2013). Women can judge sexual unfaithfulness from unfamiliar men’s faces. Biology Letters, 9, 20120908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D. (2001). Mate choice trade-offs and women’s preference for physically attractive men. Human Nature, 12, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jillian J. M. O’Connor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

O’Connor, J.J.M. (2018). Perceptions of Infidelity Cues. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1719-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1719-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics