Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Infidelity Risk

  • Betul UrganciEmail author
  • Barış Sevi
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1711-1

Synonyms

Definition

The factors that increase the prevalence of infidelity within the context of exclusive relationships.

Introduction

Infidelity may include a broad range of behaviors depending on the perspective of the individual. Different behaviors from flirtatious acts, to emotional involvement, to sexual intercourse may or may not be considered infidelity. Although it may be hard to pinpoint infidelity with absolute precision, its negative consequences are easy to detect. Infidelity is related with negative health outcomes and is the most common reason for marital dissolution around the world. There are different factors that increase the risk of infidelity, and these factors that make people more prone to infidelity can be examined in three levels: personal level, relationship level, and contextual level.

Personal Level

Some individual differences are reported with a higher risk to engage...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen, E. S., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., Gordon, K. C., & Glass, S. P. (2005). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12(2), 101–130.Google Scholar
  2. Birnbaum, G. E., Mizrahi, M., Kovler, L., Shutzman, B., Aloni-Soroker, A., & Reis, H. T. (2019). Our fragile relationships: Relationship threat and its effect on the allure of alternative mates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(3), 703–713.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, T. J., & Monaco, K. (2013). Your cheatin’heart: Joint production, joint consumption and the likelihood of extramarital sex. Applied Economics Letters, 20(3), 272–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeWall, C. N., Lambert, N. M., Slotter, E. B., Pond Jr, R. S., Deckman, T., Finkel, E. J., … Fincham, F. D. (2011). So far away from one’s partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: Avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2017). Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Russell, V. M., Baker, L. R., & McNulty, J. K. (2013). Attachment insecurity and infidelity in marriage: Do studies of dating relationships really inform us about marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 27(2), 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sacco, D. F., & Brown, M. (2018). Prevention of infidelity. In T. Shackelford & V. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Træen, B., & Stigum, H. (1998). Parallel sexual relationships in the Norwegian context. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Whisman, M. A., Gordon, K. C., & Chatav, Y. (2007). Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Brian B Boutwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Saint Louis UniversitySaint LouisUSA