Definition
Shortcomings in and criticisms of the theory Origin of Species related to Darwin’s/Wallace’s theory of natural selection and how those gaps were filled.
Introduction
This entry focuses on gaps in the initial theory of Charles Darwin in his 1859 book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life and its six subsequent revisions. This work can be summarized as two major arguments (Bowler 1989): First, it argued that species evolved via a process of “descent with modification.” Second, it argued that this process was driven by natural selection, an evolutionary mechanism co-discovered with Alfred Russel Wallace that required a struggle for existence, variation with fitness consequences, and inheritance of that variation. This work remains standing as a...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bowler, P. J. (1989). Evolution: The history of an idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D. (2009). Darwin and genetics. Genetics, 183, 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.109991.
Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock: Altruism and sexual selection from Darwin to today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
Domondon, A. T. (2013). A history of altruism focusing on Darwin, Allee and E.O. Wilson. Endeavour, 37, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2012.12.001.
Dugatkin, L. A. (2007). Inclusive fitness theory from Darwin to Hamilton. Genetics, 176, 1375–1380.
Gawne, R. (2015). Fossil evidence in the origin of species. Bioscience, 65, 1077–1083. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv124.
Gayon, J. (1998). Darwinism’s struggle for survival: Heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, A. G., & Ratterman, N. L. (2009). Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, USA, 106, 10001–10008, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901129106.
Mallett, J. (2008). Mayr’s view of Darwin: Was Darwin wrong about speciation? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 95, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01089.x.
Ratnieks, F. L. W., Foster, K. R., & Wenseleers, T. (2011). Darwin’s special difficulty: The evolution of “neuter insects” and current theory. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1124-8.
Tattersall, I. (2009). Charles Darwin and human evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0098-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kushnick, G. (2020). Gaps in Darwin’s Initial Theory. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1385-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1385-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences