Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Access to Alloparents

  • Emily EmmottEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_112-1

Synonyms

Definition

An alloparent is any individual who is not the biological parent, who helps to raise the child by providing direct or indirect investments. Alloparents may include kin members such as grandparents, siblings, aunts and uncles, as well as nonkin such as friends, neighbors, and professional caregivers.

Introduction

Several prominent scientists studying human behavior from an evolutionary perspective have proposed that humans are cooperative breeders. Cooperative breeding is loosely defined as a breeding system where mothers require help from other individuals for successful childrearing (Hrdy 2005).

This proposal stems from the observation that human neonates are incredibly helpless compared to other primates, only able to carry out basic functions. Human prematurity at birth is coupled with a slow development and maturation period throughout childhood and adolescence. Consequently, children require...

Keywords

Parental Investment Child Quality Maternal Investment Paternal Investment Alloparental Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Assave, A., Arpino, B., & Goisis., A. (2012). Grandparenting and mother’s labour force participation: A comparative analysis using the Generations and Gender Survey. Demographic Research, 27(3), 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentley, G., & Mace, R. (2009). Substitute parents: Biological and social perspectives on alloparenting in human societies. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  3. Emmott, E. H. (2015). Allomaternal Investments and Child Outcomes in the United Kingdom. Ph.D. thesis. London: University College.Google Scholar
  4. Hrdy, S. (2005). Cooperative breeders with an ace in the hole. In W. Schiefenhoevel (Ed.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary origin of the second half of female life. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hewlett, B., & Lamb, M. (2005). Hunter Gatherer childhoods. New York: Aldine/de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  6. Kushnick, G. (2012). Helper effects on breeder allocations to direct care. American Journal of Human Biology, 24, 4,545–4,550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. LeVine, R. A., Dixon, S., Levine, S., Keefer, C. H., Richman, A., Brazelton, T. B., & Leiderman, P. H. (1996). Chind care and culture: Lessons from Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Meehan, C. L. (2009). Maternal time allocation in two cooperative childrearing societies. Human Nature, 20, 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Quinlan, R. J., & Quinlan., M. B. (2007). Evolutionary ecology of human pair-bonds: Cross-cultural tests of alternative hypotheses. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 2,149–2,169.Google Scholar
  10. Sear, R., & Coall., D. (2011). How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 37, 81–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology, University College LondonLondonUK