Abstract
The chapter analyzes current views concerning teachers of English who teach it in the context when students learn it as a foreign language (EFL), i.e., outside English-speaking countries. Relative positions and advantages and disadvantages of teachers of English who are native speakers of the language and nonnative speakers of it (sharing their students’ mother tongue) are compared and contrasted. In EFL contexts highly qualified nonnative-speaking teachers of English appear to have a number of advantages that their native-speaking colleague cannot enjoy. These advantages include the option of using the students’ mother tongue whenever and wherever it can facilitate and accelerate the process of learning English, preparedness for developing students’ interlingual and intercultural awareness and for understanding students’ specific difficulties in learning English which are due to the influence of their native language and home culture, as well as the ability to function as achievable models of EFL mastery to the students. On the other hand, nonnative-speaking EFL teachers have a number of disadvantages as compared to native speakers: foreign accent and other imperfections in English, not being aware of the most recent developments in the language they teach, the cultures of the English-speaking nations, and the latest methods of teaching both. This chapter suggests some ways of capitalizing on the advantages of the nonnative and native EFL teachers with the view of mutually eliminating their respective disadvantages.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641–652.
Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9–32.
Barrett, B., & Sharma, P. (2003). The internet and business English. Oxford: Summertown Publishing.
Berns, M. (1990a). Contexts of competence: Social and cultural considerations in communicative language teaching. New York/London: Plenum Press.
Berns, M. (1990b). “Second” and “foreign” language in second language acquisition/foreign language learning: A sociolinguistic perspective. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition/foreign language learning (pp. 3–11). Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). TESOL at forty: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 9–34.
Chick, K. J. (1996). Intercultural communication. In S. L. McKay & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 329–348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Strasbourg.
Deignan, A., Gabrys, D., & Solska, A. (1997). Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. ELT Journal, 51(4), 352–360.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL realization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469.
Ellis, E. M. (2006). Language learning experience as a contributor to ESOL teacher cognition. TESL-EJ, 10(1), 1–28. Retrieved from the Internet at http://tesl-ej.org/ej37/a3.html as of August 21, 2006.
Graddol, D. (2006). English next. Why Global English may mean the end of English as a foreign language. British Council.
Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. The French Review, 65, 708–718.
Hornberger, N. (1996). Language and education. In S. L. McKay & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 449–473). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howatt, A. P. R., & Widdowson, H. G. (2004). A history of English language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hymes, D. (1986). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, J. (2004). ELF at the gate: The position of English as a lingua franca. The European English Messenger, 13(2), 63–69.
Kachru, B. B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.
Kachru, B. B., & Nelson, C. L. (1996). World Englishes. In S. L. McKay & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 71–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kramsch, C. J. (1990). What is a foreign language learning research. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition/foreign language learning (pp. 27–33). Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Kramsch, C. (2003). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Kubota, M. (2004). Native speaker: A unitary fantasy of a diverse reality. The Language Teacher, 28(1), 3–10.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Maguire, M. H. (2010). Lessons in understanding Montreal heritage language contexts: Whose literacies and voices are privileged? Cahiers de L’ILOB/OLBI Working Papers, 1, 25–50.
McGroarty, M. (1996). Language, attitudes, motivation, and standards. In S. L. McKay & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 3–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Dwyer, L. M. (1996). Putting the T in TESOL. TESOL Matters, 6(2), 21.
Paulston, C. B. (1992). Linguistic and communicative competence: Topics in ESL. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Pawlak, M. (2006). The place of form-focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. Kalisz-Poznań: Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny w Kaliszu, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rampton, M. B. H. (1990). Displacing the “Native Speaker”: Expertise, affiliation and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), 97–101.
Savignon, S. J. (1990). In second language acquisition/foreign language learning, nothing is more practical than a good theory. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition/foreign language learning (pp. 185–197). Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Schweers, C. W. (1997). Language transfer. What do we know? TESOL Matters, 7(5), 10.
Seliger, H. (1988). Psycholinguistic issues in second language acquisition. In L. M. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition (pp. 17–40). New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tang, C. (1997). On the power and status of nonnative ESL teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 557–580.
Tarnopolsky, O. (2000). EFL teaching and EFL teachers in the global expansion of English. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 16(2), 25–42.
Tarnopolsky, O. (2012). Constructivist blended learning approach to teaching English for specific purposes. London: Versita.
Tarnopolsky, O. (2015). Communicative-analytic method in teaching English to adults at commercial language schools and centers in Ukraine. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 65, 16–26. Switzerland: SciPress. Retrieved from the Internet at www.scipress.com/ILSHS.65.16 as of December 21, 2015.
Tarnopolsky, O., & Sklyarenko, N. (2003). Lifestyle communicative behavioral patterns in the USA. Kyiv: INKOS.
Thornbury, S. (n.d.) Methods, post-method, and métodos. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/methods-post-method-métodos
Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon/Philadelphia/Adelaide: Multilingual Matters.
VanPatten, B. (1990). Theory and research in second language acquisition and foreign language learning: On producers and consumers. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition/foreign language learning (pp. 17–26). Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 45–57.
Walsh, T. M., & Diller, K. C. (1981). Neurolinguistic considerations on the optimum age for second language learning. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 3–21). Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.
Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Alexandria: TESOL.
Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377–389.
Wildner-Bassett, M. E. (1990). Coexistence discourse worlds: The development of pragmatic competence inside and outside the classroom. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition/foreign language learning (pp. 140–152). Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tarnopolsky, O. (2017). Nonnative-Speaking Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. In: Van Deusen-Scholl, N., May, S. (eds) Second and Foreign Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02246-8_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02246-8_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02245-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02246-8
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education