Skip to main content

Consumer Bias

Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Abstract

Since the founding work of Simon (1955) and Kahneman and Tversky (1974, 1986), it is recognized that agents, namely consumers, are endowed with a bounded rationality. Consumer biases cover a wide range of behaviors, such as quality misperception, status quo bias, projection bias, inertia, and can have various consequences on the market equilibrium. The aftermaths of consumer misperception depend on the type of bias one considers, as well as on the market structure. This entry presents a typology of consumer biases and mentions possible consequences on the market outcome. Policy recommendations to fight against consumer biases, as well as the main counterarguments put forward by libertarians, will finally be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bar-Gill O (2011) Competition and consumer protection: a behavioral economics account. Law & Economics Research paper series, working-paper no 11–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk L, Posner R (2006) One-sided contracts in competitive consumer markets. Mich Law Rev 104:827–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C, Issacharoff S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2003) Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”. Uni Pennsylvannia Law Rev 3(151):1211–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2004) Contract design and self-control: theory and evidence. Q J Econ 119(2):353–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2006) Paying not to go to the gym. Am Econ Rev 96(3):694–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliaz K, Spiegler R (2006) Contracting with diversely naive agents. Rev Econ Stud 73(3):689–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G (2006) Bounded rationality in industrial organization. In: Blundell R, Newey WK & Persson T (eds), ‘Advances in economics and econometrics: theory and applications’, Vol. 2 of Ninth World Congress, Cambrige university Press, pp. 142–219. http://economics.mit.edu/files/904

  • Huck S, Zhou J (2011) Consumer behavioral biases in competition: a survey, Final Report OFT1324, Office of Fair Trading

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolls C, Sunstein C (2006) Debiasing through law. J Leg Stud 35(1):199–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Staus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Bus 59(4):S251–S278

    Google Scholar 

  • Klick J, Mitchell G (2006) Government regulation of irrationality: moral and cognitive hazards. Minnesota Law Rev 90:1620–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • Korobkin R (2003) Bounded rationality, standard form contracts, and unconscionability. Uni Chicago Law Rev 70(4):1203–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köszegi B (2014) Behavioral contract theory. J Econ Lit 52(4):1075–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2003) Projection bias in predicting future utility. Q J Econ 118(4):1209–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccione M, Spiegler R (2012) Price competition under limited comparability. Q J Econ 127:97–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M (2002) A perspective in psychology and economics. Eur Econ Rev 46:657–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Paul G (2011) The tyranny of utility: behavioral social science and the rise of paternalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegler R (2006) Competing over agents with boundedly rational expectations. Theor Econ 1(2):207–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R (2008) Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Constit Polit Econ 19:226–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein C, Thaler R (2003) Libertarian paternalism. Am Econ Rev 2(93):175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein C, Thaler R (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale University Press, New Heaven, CT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman DG, Rizzo M (2007) Paternalist slopes’, NYU. J Law Econ 2:411–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman DG, Rizzo M (2009) The knowledge problem of new paternalism. Brigham Young Uni Law Rev 4:904–968. http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2009/iss4/4/

Further Reading

  • Bernheim D, Rangel A (2009) Beyond revealed preferences: choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Q J Econ 124(1):51–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M (2002) A perspective in psychology and economics. Eur Econ Rev 46:657–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlinski J (2003) The uncertain psychological case for paternalism. Northwest Univ Law Rev 97(3):1165–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegler R (2011) Bounded rationality in industrial organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie Bienenstock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bienenstock, S. (2018). Consumer Bias. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_655-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_655-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Consumer Bias: Consumer Misperception; Consumer Irrationality
    Published:
    26 November 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_655-2

  2. Original

    Consumer Bias
    Published:
    14 October 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_655-1