Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Living Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Climate Change Remedies

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_616-1

Abstract

The law and economics analysis of the climate change remedies has been focused on the question of which would be the policy instrument most suited to provide incentives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The literature focuses mainly on the comparison of carbon taxes and emission trading scheme. But a relevant role can be played by financial and insurance instruments, especially considering the adaptation and mitigation strategies. Finally, another instrument is considered, largely used to internalize other environmental externalities but still not so much analysed for climate change, the liability system.

Keywords

Burning Income 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Faure M, Peeters M (2011) Climate change liability. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Feess E, Hege U (2000) Environmental harm, and financial responsibility. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issue Pract 25:220–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: synthesis report. In: RT Watson and the Core Team (eds) A contribution of working groups I, II, III to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaplow L, Shavell S (2002) On the superiority of corrective taxes to quantity, American Law and Economics Review, 4, pp. 1–17Google Scholar
  5. Kaul I, Conceicao P, Le Goulven K, Mendoza RU (2003) How to improve the provision of global public goods. In: UNDP (ed) Providing global goods – managing globalization. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mitchell T, Tanner TM (2006) Adapting to climate change: challenges and opportunities for the development community. Tearfund, MiddlesexGoogle Scholar
  7. Nordhaus DW (2006) After Kyoto: alternative mechanisms to control global warming. FPIF discussion paperGoogle Scholar
  8. Nordhaus DW (2007) To tax or not to tax: alternative approach to slowing global warming. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1:26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pizer W (1999) Choosing price or quantity controls for greenhouse gases, resources for the future. Climate Issue Brief no 17Google Scholar
  10. Porrini D (2011) The (potential) role of insurance sector in climate change economic policies. Environ Econ 2(1):15–24Google Scholar
  11. Posner R (2004) Catastrophe. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Weitzman ML (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41(4):477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Economics, Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly