Skip to main content

The Impacts of Fracking on Climate Change

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

In media, hydraulic fracturing (fracking) often refers to the two steps applied for extracting natural gas trapped in shale formations. The first step is to drill down to the sedimentary rocks and then drill sideways for a mile or more. This horizontal drilling has been widely practiced since the 1980s to extract conventional oil and gas. In the second step, the producers must deploy hydraulic fracturing; using high pressure, fracking pumps into open fractures in the rocks with millions of gallons of water, sand, and chemicals that allow oil and gas to flow. Fracking was introduced into gas mining as early as in 1940s and then was efficiently combined with horizontal drilling in 1990s. Fracking has resulted in significant economic hopes and opportunities such as employment, income, and tax revenue growth in shale play regions but with increasing public awareness and concerns about the environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing. Many studies have talked about the processes of hydraulic fracturing and its environmental impacts including surface and ground water resources, air pollution, seismic activities, environmental and the population at risks of fracking, and landscape and ecosystem disturbance. However, there are still a lot of issues related to the impacts of fracking on the climate. In this chapter, the author summarizes a concise understanding of the conception and technological process of fracking, its development and worldwide extent, and then focus on methane emission issues related to fracking, and its consequences of climate changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen DT, Torres VM, Thomas J, Sullivan DW, Harrison M et al (2013) Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 343:733–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez RA, Pacala SW, Winebrake JJ, Chameides WL, Hamburg SP (2012) Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:6435–6440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez RA, Zavala-Araiza D, Lyon DR et al (2018) Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science 361(6398):186–188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt AR, Heath GA, Kort EA, O’Sullivan F, Pétron G et al (2014) Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science 343:733–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Geological Survey (2012) The unconventional hydrocarbon resources of Britain’s onshore basins – shale gas “Interview with Dan Steward, Former Mitchell energy vice president”. Breakthrough blog. The Breakthrough Institute. 20 December 2011. Accessed 1 Apr 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • CACC (2020) Fracking and climate change. http://campaigncc.org/fracking_facts. Accessed 23 Sept 2020

  • Cant DJ, Ethier VG (1984) Lithology-dependent diagenetic control of reservoir properties of conglomerates, Falher member, Elmworth Field, Alberta. Bull Am Assoc Pet Geol 68(8):1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulton DR, Shepson PB, Santoro RL, Sparks JP, Howarth RW, Ingraffea AR, Cambaliza MOL, Sweeney C, Karion A, Davis KJ, Stirm BH, Montzka SA, Miller BR (2014) Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions form shale gas development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(17):6237–6242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopp T (2012, 13 February) New Jersey senate committee again passes gas-fracking ban. Businessweek. Accessed 1 Apr 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds J, McJeon H (2013) Implications of abundant natural gas, Presented at Abundant Gas Workshop, April 29. Glob. Technol. Strat. Proj., Cambridge. http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/data/gtsp/topical_workshops/2013/spring/presentations/Edmonds_ImplicationsOfAbundantGas_2013-04-29.pdf

  • EPA (2010) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from natural sources. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2015) Overview of greenhouse gases. http://epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/ch4.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2015

  • Fischetti M (2012) Fracking would emit large quantities of greenhouse gases. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fracking-would-emit-methane/. Accessed 23 Sept 2020

  • Geman B (2011) Study: gas from ‘fracking’ worse than coal on climate. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/155101-report-gas-from-fracking-worse-than-coal-on-climate. Accessed 23 Sept 2020

  • Howarth RW, Santoro R, Ingraffea A (2011a) Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim Chang 106:679–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RW, Ingraffea A, Engelder T (2011b) Natural gas: should fracking stop? Nature 477:271–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hweshe F (2012, 17 September) South Africa: international groups rally against fracking, TKAG Claims. West Cape News. Accessed 13 Apr 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Down A, Phillips NG, Ackley RC, Cook CW et al (2014) Natural gas pipeline leaks across Washington, D.C. Environ Sci Technol 48:2051–2058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karion A, Sweeney C, Pétron G, Frost G, Hardesty RM et al (2013) Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field. Geophys Res Lett 40:4393–4397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler M (2005) Productivity of frac stimulations in the German Rotliegend: theoretical considerations and practical results. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Paper 94250-MS, June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuuskraa V, Stevens S, Van Leeuwen T, Moodhe K (2011) World shale gas resources: an initial assessmentof 14 regions outside the USA. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelieveld J, Lechtenboehmer S, Assonov SS, Brenninkmeijer CAM, Dienst C et al (2005) Greenhouse gases: low methane leakage from gas pipelines. Nature 434:841–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher D (1989) Hydraulic proppant fracturing and gravel packing. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 176–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q (2015) Modeling and prediction of natural gas fracking pad landscapes in the Marcellus Shale region, USA. A rejoinder to Klein and Mandas commentary. Landsc Urban Plan 136:52–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SM, Wofsy SC, Michalak AM, Kort EA, Andrews AE et al (2013) Anthropogenic emissions ofmethane in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:20018–20022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne JES, Howie RD (1966) Developments in eastern Canada in 1965. Bull Am Assoc Pet Geol 50(6):1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell C, Sweet J, Jackson T (1990) A study of leakage from the UK natural gas distribution system. Energy Policy 18:809–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore T, Bar-Ilan A (2013) Upstream oil and gas emission inventories: regulatory and technical considerations, Presented at “Air quality and oil & gas development in the rocky mountain region workshop”, Oct. 21, Boulder. http://www.wrapair2.org/pdf/Moore_Barilan_OandG_Inventories. Accessed 15 Mar 2015

  • Newell RG, Raimi S (2014) Implications of shale gas development for climate change. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4046154

  • Pétron G et al (2012) Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado front range: a pilot study. J Geophys Res 117(D4):D04304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pétron G, Karion A, Sweeney C, Miller BR, Montzka SA et al (2014) A new look at methane and nonmethanehydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver-Julesburg Basin. J Geophys Res 119(11):6836–6852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips NG, Ackley R, Crosson ER, Down A, Hutyra LR et al (2013) Mapping urban pipeline leaks: methane leaks across Boston. Environ Pollut 173:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneising O, Burrows JP, Dickerson RR, Buchwitz M, Reuter M, Bovensmann H (2014) Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geologic formations, Earth’s Future 2:548–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz HM, Horsfield B, Sachsenhofer RF (2010) Shale gas in Europe: a regional overview and current research activities. Pet Geol Conf Ser 7:1079–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwietzke S, Sherwood O, Bruhwiler L et al (2016) Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database. Nature 538:88–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shellenberger M, Nordhaus T (2011, 16 December) A boom in shale gas? Credit the feds. The Washington Post

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian (2020) How fracking can contribute to climate change. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/may/29/fracking-contribute-climate-change. Accessed 23 Sept 2020

  • US Energy Inf. Admin (2013) Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources: an assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States. http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/pdf/overview.pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2015

  • US Energy Inf. Admin (2014) Natural gas gross withdrawals and production. US Energy Information Administration, Ind. Stat. Anal, US Dep. Energy, Washington, DC. Last modified June 30. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_a_EPG0_FGW_mmcf_a.htm

  • US Environ. Prot. Agency (2010) US greenhouse gas sources and sinks inventory: 1990–2008, Rep. EPA 430-R-10-006, April 15. US Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/508_Complete_GHG_1990_2008.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environ. Prot. Agency (2011) US greenhouse gas sources and sinks inventory: 1990–2009, Rep. EPA 430-R-11-005, April 15. US Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2011-Complete_Report.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environ. Prot. Agency (2012) Oil and natural gas sector: new source performance standards and national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants reviews. Final rule. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505,FRL-9665-1. Fed Regist 77(159):49490–49598

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environ. Prot. Agency (2013) US greenhouse gas sources and sinks inventory: 1990–2011, Rep. EPA 430-R-13-001, April 22. US Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2013-Main-Text.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • US Gov. Account. Off (2010) Federal oil and gas leases: opportunities exist to capture vented and flared natural gas, which would increase royalty payments and reduce greenhouse gases. Rep. to Congr. Req., GAO-11-34, Oct., Washington, DC. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-34. Accessed 15 Mar 2015

  • Watts J (2011, 21 April) China takes step towards tapping shale gas potential with first well. guardian.co.uk, London. Accessed 15 Mar 2015

  • Wells D (2012) Condensate tank emissions, Presented at Int. Emiss. Invent. Conf. Sess. 6, Oil Gas Explor. Prod., Aug. 13–15, Tampa, FL. http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/conference/ei20/session6/dwells.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingmin Meng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Meng, Q. (2021). The Impacts of Fracking on Climate Change. In: Lackner, M., Sajjadi, B., Chen, WY. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_62-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_62-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6431-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6431-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Chemistry and Mat. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    The Impacts of Fracking on Climate Change
    Published:
    10 November 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_62-2

  2. Original

    Fracking
    Published:
    03 February 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_62-1